size relativity

Discussion in 'Show Off' started by Wish-4-8, Jan 8, 2009.

  1. Wish-4-8

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    LA, California
    So I am looking at all these pictures of dicks on this site that are suppose to be a certain size, and the one thing I notice is that they do not look that big in some pictures. I mean, an 8" dick is going to look different on a guy 6'5", then a 5'7" guy. (BTW, I am not accusing anyone of lying about their size. That is not the point of this thread)

    Also, the girthier the dick, the shorter it seems to look. (in the pictures) and with no scale to compare it, it is more difficult to appreciate the size. I have noticed that some guys will put an American 25 cent coin, or a quarter, on their dicks. The coin is just under an inch. So then what is the point?

    It seems to me that a dick that is 7.5 in length and 5.5 in girth looks better than a dick 8" and 6.5 in girth. It is "prettier" IMHO. Someone like Peter North has an asthetically pleasing penis.

    What is the best Length to Girth ratio? Since this is completley subjective, I imagine that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. So what are you beholding? (pun)
     
  2. D_Bertrand Ballfloot

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think using the Golden Mean is the answer. So that means an 8 inch long dick should be 5 inches thick. (5 inches times 1.61 = 8)
     
  3. Cuban

    Cuban New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    338
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ontario
    8x5 is a pencil dick my friend.

    try 8x6.5
     
  4. driftingvoid

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    200
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Florida
    Verified:
    Photo
    I made a thread about this recently ... so if you want a more in-depth reply, try doing something many forum users would suggest doing in the first place: try checking the forum to make sure there's not already a thread about what you plan on bringing up.

    In any event, I agree with you to some degree: I think that the attractiveness of a given cock is very subjective to its length-to-girth ratio. Although I do think that cocks with more length than girth tend to look better, I think 1.61 is pretty high, unless we're only talking about huge cocks. 8x5 would look pretty long, but not big; 5" is pretty thin on an 8" cock. However, 6" on a 9.6" cock (same ratio) would indeed still be impressive, and 7" x ~4.4" is a very much on the thin side. In my opinion, there isn't a perfect static ratio; instead, I think it's a function of length with a set range of girths from 5"-7". But that notion is getting far too technical to entertain...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted