This challenge does not accept bone pressed measurements.
The link is nothing but pure pseudo-science.
And, four standard deviations? Um, no.
Based on what? Your intimate knowledge of the scientific process?
Hi friend, I appreciate your thoughts. Get ready for a deluge.
It's been a long time since I've worked with statistics, but I actually do have a masters in finance with an emphasis in stochastic processes. But, all you need is basic high school stats to perform my analysis above.
Why would you use 6.2"?
Your own link states:
- Average length bone pressed is anything from 5-6 inches, almost always around 5.3-5.6. Just over 14cm is the most commonly found figure (14cm is 5.51 inches). The highest ever average in an remotely legitimate study is 6.2 inches. One solitary study with an average of over 6 inches, all the rest fall short.
The info I see for Wessels as listed as a participant in the BJUI meta-analysis states far differently. An average length of 5.07 inches. The BJUI study compiled results from surveys taken globally. Over 15,000 subjects. The average was 5.2". As the largest study analysis to date, this is likely to have better accuracy than cherry picked random studies. Note that Wessels was only an 80-man study.
@grandunification
That "study" isn't even cited on PhalloBoards, someone copy and pasted it without referencing the source. PhalloBoards, by the way, is a forum dedicated to surgical alteration of male genitalia. Also, the user posting these studies did so with the intent of showing the cuckold and SPH guys on that forum, apparently that's a lot of the content there, that the typical range of penis size is actually smaller than most would think. They even mention how someones girlfriends reference to an 8x6 penis was probably a lie.
Why would you link to a source that works against your claim?
Also, there are about 800,000 members on this site. And using your claim of 117,000 10" men in the world, then that would mean that approximately 1 in 64,000 men would be at least 10 inches, so there should be about 12 users on this site with that size. The number would likely be lower because there are female members on the site, and members who may be inactive though I'm not sure if they are counted. Still, by your own math there should be a few on this site, and if not then there should be plenty who have seen the thread advertised on Twitter and Reddit.
There really isn't much of a point in saying that they should exist. Nobody cares if they should or not, the thread is about finding evidence of one. You should be able to find evidence based your claims, so show the evidence instead of a claim.
That "study" isn't even cited on PhalloBoards, someone copy and pasted it without referencing the source. PhalloBoards, by the way, is a forum dedicated to surgical alteration of male genitalia. Also, the user posting these studies did so with the intent of showing the cuckold and SPH guys on that forum, apparently that's a lot of the content there, that the typical range of penis size is actually smaller than most would think. They even mention how someones girlfriends reference to an 8x6 penis was probably a lie.
Why would you link to a source that works against your claim?
Also, there are about 800,000 members on this site. And using your claim of 117,000 10" men in the world, then that would mean that approximately 1 in 64,000 men would be at least 10 inches, so there should be about 12 users on this site with that size. The number would likely be lower because there are female members on the site, and members who may be inactive though I'm not sure if they are counted. Still, by your own math there should be a few on this site, and if not then there should be plenty who have seen the thread advertised on Twitter and Reddit.
There really isn't much of a point in saying that they should exist. Nobody cares if they should or not, the thread is about finding evidence of one. You should be able to find evidence based your claims, so show the evidence instead of a claim.
The site you linked, the guy giving the info even said it was the only in all studies with an average over 6 inches. He used it as proof that the average is most likely not close to 6.2 inches.
I believe it is the only study specifying bone pressed. Also, the lifestyle study found an average of 5.9" and it was non bone pressed. Who knows what they would have found were it bone pressed, maybe close to 7".
All of those studies that resulted in longer averages were volunteer-based, and it is a well known fact that volunteer-based studies result in significantly higher averages than do studies where the participants are chosen randomly.
Yes.
Indeed.
Could not agree more.
290.....pages of talk.
Citing studies is all well and good.
This thread is about finding and presenting the proof.
Thats all.
You're taking the word of what some guy wrote on a web forum. Find the actual data on Wessels. It's listed in the BJUI meta. It isn't 6.2". But don't take that from me, or that guy. Do your research. The BJUI analysis compiled and analyzed peer-reviewed studies from around the world that met strict standards for methodology and sample group, as well as excluding self-reporting studies. Its 15,000 man sample group is the largest such study.
If Wessels had an 8.3" guy, so what? Nobody here has ever said there are no 8.3" guys. Most of the "huge" samples we've been presented are in the 8" range. If there was a point relevant to this thread, I'm not sure what you were driving at. The average and the SD can only point to probability. And the data you cite appear badly flawed. Find reliable source data.
I have seen the original data, 6.2" was the average for bone pressed. 5.1" for non bone pressed. The data is perfect. The data predicts there are 10" dicks out there if bone pressed.
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Posts
- 2,156
- Media
- 41
- Likes
- 7,135
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Dublin (Leinster, Ireland)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
No such thing as perfect data. All data is imperfect and has biases inherent in it.
Anyway, back to the point of the thread, someone, anyone with a provable 10 incher?
Judging by the results of that 8" ruler thread and several others here, those numbers alone should have been enough to discredit that study.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2009
- Posts
- 146
- Media
- 26
- Likes
- 3,502
- Points
- 598
- Location
- Peoria (Arizona, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
It's become somewhat of a "Schroedinger's cat".
