Wow just wow
It's even more obvious than I have imagined. But as I said, good that more and more are able to recognise it.He's cooked but really you can completely disregard the reddit videos when you have the 'the smoking gun' videos here with clear examples of the smaller Fleshlight Torque Go Ice case/shell with a cut down/shortened Fleshlight Ice Lady sleeve in it. It makes any conjecture of AI irrelevant even though it was clearly used on various reddit videos (i.e. those with a ruler or tape measure in them).Wow just wow
This isn't a case of OMG he's nearly 10 it's not even well he's definitely 9 but the way he's measuring is giving the extra length or he's recently lost weight. It's a straight up "That's a Fleshlight Go and to push all the way through it as shown on the xvideos site you have to be around 7.5 give or take 0.5"
It's game set and match, no conjecture about artifacts, compression whatever, case closed.
https://www.lpsg.com/attachments/gmbmeasurement1-png.554767/
Has this man already been mentioned here? Has he been debunked?
Has this man already been mentioned here? Has he been debunked?
Right, saw that too. Again totally obvious when you zoom in
When he is stroking towards his body that vein is disappearing and when he strokes back to the head it suddenly appears again. Every time.
View attachment 200750261
That is because skin is stretched as he strokes forward, making the vein press against the skin tighter.
Are you honestly using that to assert that his penis is fabricated? In all of his videos, his dick looks the same. Same downward curve. From the top, the dorsal vein is in the same position.
The table is covered in tiny imperfections. As are the hairs on his scrotum. I have not seen any AI videos that do that yet. There are tons all over youtube, and they all jump out as obvious fakes. Everything has this hyperreal, perfectly centered, every time, overly perfect.
At this point, it appears that any evidence he would post you would dismiss as "fake."
What level of proof would you need from him? What sort of video and resolution? Is there anything he could put in the picture that AI cannot do?
Only that one single vein ? Why not others ? The thing is that on almost everyone of his pictures and videos there is something wrong. It's the amount.
That's why I said before:
Also I don't think that his whole penis is fabricated. I think that's his cock. But I believe that he manipulates surroundings, backgrounds and other things so that it appears bigger than it actually is.
Sometimes with video tricks (not necessarily AI, maybe other video trickery too), sometimes with other more conventional methods (like the fleshlight incident).
same dick, just manipulated surrounding features, which can be done with video editing
The table moves different than the floor in the same video. The cutout of his dick with the shadow in the other video. The way only parts of the background move in other videos, those aren’t imperfections in the wood
respectfully, would u accept any arguments against his length? because it seems like you are willingly ignoring a lot. How do u explain the fleshlight mod and the obvious 7” girth lie?
anyone with video editing software and some effort can overlay videos onto other videos. we see that all the time. in the hands of amateurs, even skilled amateurs, u see weird effects and outlines, just like in his. i don’t think he said make me a measurement of my dick looking like it’s 10 inches to chatgpt, but it looks pretty obvious he is grifting to cheat someone out of money
You'd be surprised what some of the guys who really know that stuff and design workflows for NSFW videos can do. There are LoRA's and models specifically tuned to do fine details in skin and such. Go check WAN2.2 clips on the Civitai site where they showcase their work. Fortunately, all the hardcore AI nerds are tied up right now with big boob hot chick blondes, furries, and anime types. I'd hate to see what they could do on a fake dick measurement video.
I too don't believe most of this is "AI" though. I'm still not certain what functions you would utilize to edit an existing dick clip like that, but I don't know enough to say for certain. To me, it looks like standard visual stuff, sometimes used in conjunction with others, as certain videos and images where the lens wasn't doing as much are too telling and don't look like they could be anywhere near the length we're seeing in some of the ruler shots. The ruler also is possibly being bowed in some of the side views and appears to be starting on the left of the shaft and ending somewhere maybe even behind the right of it.
Still have no fuckin' idea what the actual size might be, but I agree with what was said above about assuming that someone who (possibly) makes deceptive pictures or videos must still be close to whatever size they want you to see. It's anybody's guess when that happens.
Attachments
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Posts
- 622
- Media
- 76
- Likes
- 8,829
- Points
- 848
- Location
- The Americas
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
There is a slightly smaller flashlight, right? Are we 100% sure which one it is? Are we seeing it from the side when it exits the back? I'm just asking, because I haven't seen these videos...
Roxx.
All these people claiming editing, I'm not saying you're wrong, but could any of you at the very least prove it by replicating it on your own end?? If you are actually 6 but you can use the tricks you're alleging him to use to make it 7, it would do wonders to support the argument, rather than just saying it. It would definitely convince me if anyone could actually replicate the technique themselves, the guys in his 50s allegedly and I'm sure most of us are younger and more tech savvy. Surely one of us can figure it out and show
it’s all over YouTube. this stuff is done with vacation videos. it takes time and it isn’t my money. look up some tutorials where people do this with SFW stuff.
age has nothing to do with it. 50 isn’t that old, if anything, a 50 year old with a decade or two of experience with editing could do wonders
can you really not see all the strange artifacts?
I'm just saying it would do a lot if someone could do an actual replication with an actual penis so it's the same circumstances, I understand if you personally don't feel like going through the trouble, neither do I. But it would help if someone did because it would make it absolutely undeniable, rather than people being able to say things like it's cos of image compression this or video codec that, so and and so forth
Much easier to claim something than actually do it.
I actually applaud allaboutfun ... already plotting years ago and modifying fleshlights for his 7 incher, posting pictures of 9 nbp and then disappearing, learning and perfecting editing and AI just to come back and finally get those 10" dollars.
A real Lex Luthor of LPSG.
He should apply to Dreamworks Interactive
To believe an extreme claim (be that 9+ or 10) with clear evidence showing a modified/hybrid fleshlight and videos full of anomalies is some majorly flawed basic thought process.Much easier to claim something than actually do it.
I actually applaud allaboutfun ... already plotting years ago and modifying fleshlights for his 7 incher, posting pictures of 9 nbp and then disappearing, learning and perfecting editing and AI just to come back and finally get those 10" dollars.
A real Lex Luthor of LPSG.
He should apply to Dreamworks Interactive
I'd forget the Dreamworks Pictures? job as 15s, 30s clips full of artifacts running at 10, 12 FPS @ potato resolutions isn't going to get him past the application stage.
In real terms of replicating the fake reddit videos like others have said this isn't a chatGPT request it's something like Comfy UI Lora Workflows/Trainers and giving it a decent chunk of real imagery/videos of yourself (or whoever) to spend hours training it on. It's not the work of a moment, I've got a vaguely decent but aging GPU in a 3090 but from what I've read it would be churning away for hours/days then I'd have to 'get good' at the whole process.
I'm not spending days or weeks trying to replicate this crap but one thing is for sure others will but not for the intent of disproving anything but to join in on it.
You'd be surprised what some of the guys who really know that stuff and design workflows for NSFW videos can do. There are LoRA's and models specifically tuned to do fine details in skin and such. Go check WAN2.2 clips on the Civitai site where they showcase their work. Fortunately, all the hardcore AI nerds are tied up right now with big boob hot chick blondes, furries, and anime types. I'd hate to see what they could do on a fake dick measurement video.
I too don't believe most of this is "AI" though. I'm still not certain what functions you would utilize to edit an existing dick clip like that, but I don't know enough to say for certain. To me, it looks like standard visual stuff, sometimes used in conjunction with others, as certain videos and images where the lens wasn't doing as much are too telling and don't look like they could be anywhere near the length we're seeing in some of the ruler shots. The ruler also is possibly being bowed in some of the side views and appears to be starting on the left of the shaft and ending somewhere maybe even behind the right of it.
Still have no fuckin' idea what the actual size might be, but I agree with what was said above about assuming that someone who (possibly) makes deceptive pictures or videos must still be close to whatever size they want you to see. It's anybody's guess when that happens.
Where is the left picture from? Wow
I
I think it's from that reddit archive that someone linked in here. It's actually a cap from a video there, but the whole thing looks about like that and probably shouldn't have been included. Do realize it's at a slight upward angle, but so are both of the hands. I don't think it would account for that much. There was about a million of the others on there which were almost identical. I quit scrolling after about three feet down the page, but it looked like they all showed up over a span of only 3 or 4 months. Does anybody know if the user name changed over there too and there's maybe an older batch?
I think it's from that reddit archive that someone linked in here. It's actually a cap from a video there, but the whole thing looks about like that and probably shouldn't have been included. Do realize it's at a slight upward angle, but so are both of the hands. I don't think it would account for that much. There was about a million of the others on there which were almost identical. I quit scrolling after about three feet down the page, but it looked like they all showed up over a span of only 3 or 4 months. Does anybody know if the user name changed over there too and there's maybe an older batch?
I still think we're overshooting on that. It would take you less time to just approach frame by frame in a photo editor, but it would still take forever. It's also still possible that it's neither one. (?)
PS- And you suck for having a better card than me.
I had to force myself to spring for a 3060/12GB because everybody kept promising the Nvidia prices would come down at the next expo.<EDIT> I hadn't even considered what you mention about training a LoRA or model on nothing but your own dick. I guess you'd have unlimited source material to feed it for training.
Similar threads
