The coolest atheist.

Axcess

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Posts
1,610
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
123
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
For atheists and agnostics here I got a question . Who is to you the coolest atheist ? To me is Christopher Hitchens. The way he owns religious guys in debates is awesome .
 
Well, it really depends in what context. When it comes to debates, I like Hitchens. However, when it comes to the general public's perception of the non-religious, I'd like someone who tends to be little less of an ass.
 
Well, it really depends in what context. When it comes to debates, I like Hitchens. However, when it comes to the general public's perception of the non-religious, I'd like someone who tends to be little less of an ass.
Well Christopher Hitchens is the Chuck Norris of religion . He destroy their arguments in matters of seconds , exposing their bullshit.
 
Ha, Isn't Catherine MacKinnon an atheist too? She's pretty hot for an older, feminist ;) I love her ... either way.

Hm, I'm going to google that.

There's just a lot of people in southern Texas who need some lip from atheists.
 
For atheists and agnostics here I got a question . Who is to you the coolest atheist ? To me is Christopher Hitchens. The way he owns religious guys in debates is awesome .
He's the hero of every 14 year old!!
 
It's funny that Christopher Hitchens is the exact opposite of his bro, Peter (fundamentalist).

Dawkins is a bit annoying - he seems to be a fanatical atheist, in the same way that some ppl are crazily religious.
 
It's funny that Christopher Hitchens is the exact opposite of his bro, Peter (fundamentalist).

Dawkins is a bit annoying - he seems to be a fanatical atheist, in the same way that some ppl are crazily religious.

Bullshit.

He is a scientist first and foremost and has written far more about science than about religion. His main beef is with ignorant bigots, especially those polluting our side of the pond.
 
Bullshit.

He is a scientist first and foremost and has written far more about science than about religion. His main beef is with ignorant bigots, especially those polluting our side of the pond.

Why does being a science writer preclude him from being a fanatical atheist? I think he tends to rant and use emotional arguments, quite frequently...plus, I'm not convinced he understands that much about religion.

I agree he points the finger, fairly, at ignorant bigots - but often (not always) what he seems to criticise about religion, is the behaviour and misinterpretations made by these bigots...
 
Bullshit.

He is a scientist first and foremost and has written far more about science than about religion. His main beef is with ignorant bigots, especially those polluting our side of the pond.

I don't think it's bullshit. Sure hes a scientiest, and a good one at that....but hes still very fanatical. Like the fanatical creatonists, hes not willing to compromise at all. And to be honest that's not a good trait to be found in anyone.

I agree with you on the point that he does argue with ignorant biggots, but like joll says he doesn't seem to understand much about religion at the same time.
 
I'd have to say my own personal favorite: George Carlin. I bet he's down there right now, screaming up at us!