What part of the he is on the do not post list, do you not understand? You post his pictures and you get banned...

Not exactly true, you get warning points and based on the amount of points a member has would determine if they get banned or not.

Also I totally see your point, but also this website isn't exactly sponsored by the catholic church. It's a website that hosts threads dedicated to sharing naked pictures. Your dedication to the rules is admirable but at the same time your speech is a tad hypocritical don't you think?

There is no clear permission from most of the people's whose content is being shared here, and a lot of them even have onlyfans or other watermarked media indicating a copyright so in theory anyone who signs up to be a member here is doing so willingly and under the understanding that rules will be broken or the site would cease to exist due to lack of content.

What is it about someone adding themself to the do not post list that puts them in a different position than someone who marks their content with copyright? Sharing the content no matter if they are on the do not post list or not is still a violation of their copyright. So what makes it ok for you to share/collect copyright material but then turn around and try to shame someone here for asking to do exactly what you are doing? The do not post list is a RULE from this website only, but the copyright is a LAW everywhere.
 
Not exactly true, you get warning points and based on the amount of points a member has would determine if they get banned or not.

Also I totally see your point, but also this website isn't exactly sponsored by the catholic church. It's a website that hosts threads dedicated to sharing naked pictures. Your dedication to the rules is admirable but at the same time your speech is a tad hypocritical don't you think?

There is no clear permission from most of the people's whose content is being shared here, and a lot of them even have onlyfans or other watermarked media indicating a copyright so in theory anyone who signs up to be a member here is doing so willingly and under the understanding that rules will be broken or the site would cease to exist due to lack of content.

What is it about someone adding themself to the do not post list that puts them in a different position than someone who marks their content with copyright? Sharing the content no matter if they are on the do not post list or not is still a violation of their copyright. So what makes it ok for you to share/collect copyright material but then turn around and try to shame someone here for asking to do exactly what you are doing? The do not post list is a RULE from this website only, but the copyright is a LAW everywhere.

Copyright law contains the concept of an intentional violation of copyright -- that is, when the infringement is done with notice that the image is protected by copyright. That's what getting oneself on the no post list accomplishes, much like registering a copyright with the government. The copyright exists whether or not its been registered -- but registering makes it easier to show the infringement was intentional, and that can lead to bigger damages and damages without proving any monetary loss.
 
First off, he priced it reasonably at $15.00. The actual reveal was super brief, but it was genuine reveal.

He has been honest. Looks like an average girth and a little above average on the length. He has a very slight curve to the right. Cut. A standard step of balls, it appears. Luxurious bush. Overall, a rather beautiful cock. I think he is very capable of topping and leaving all but the most voracious bottoms satisfied.

I will continue to remain subbed, would encourage others to join. He likes the money so I think the more of it he has rolling in, the more he going to post and the more he is going push his comfort boundaries.

Now if he can just shake some sense in to Jack Merridew to the do the same!

How was it? It’s been a long time coming.