The guy has a philia & a deep-seated need to validate what he had no control over. May stem from a trauma, but unpleasant nonetheless. Best not to acknowledge it.
What are the best and worst types of circumcision for sensitivity?
- Thread starter JaykeEarle25
- Start date
This is not just a trashy porn site.
I had a short conversation with a dr one day about the bennies of being intact - after a physical. He opened my eyes more. He refuses to perform circumcisions unless medically necessary and tells people how dangerous it can be. So, there's more out there if you just want to do a little research.
Says the guy who’s “research” consisted of using AI overview…
Oh a "short conversation with a dr" was enough evidence for you? Add in a "little research" and we're good to go?
Close to 700 million men on the planet are circumcised. All the propaganda in the world can't overcome the fact IF there was indeed some issue with it 800 million would not be quite about it. The only ones whining about is a fringe group with a big mouths and little else in the way of evidence. In fact they have none. And when you point that out they quickly change the subject to body integrity or some other bullshit diversion.
How a Fringe Group Turned the Internet Against Circumcision
LOL. And yes it is a porn site you have to be over 18 to access it. And what would you call these threads "Huge natural tits on a thin body" or "Cock Worship"? English literature?
Poor thing. The benighted have spoken. AI is about to take over millions of jobs. It will make far better decisions in a fraction of the time at a fraction of the cost. Your poor research and decision making will soon make people with your skill set unemployable if not already. How does it feel? Every AI iteration will be better than you. And how can it not be based on your post history? And when machine learning kicks in all you will have his your dick and intact foreskin, of course, for consolation.Says the guy who’s “research” consisted of using AI overview…
I lived 21 years as an uncircumcised man (no foreskin issues), which included a lot of sex between 18 and 21 especially, and sexual experiences with both females and males. I opted to get cut at 21 due to mostly personal, cosmetic, and comfort reasons (I appreciated the clean feeling of longer term retraction). I have a tight cut, with frenulum removed, and an inch or so of inner skin left (so neither high nor low).
Fine touch sensitivity is a bit down, but not by enough to really matter and at this stage (10+ years cut) it could also be related to ageing and having used it a lot. The difference is minor in any case and for me at least sex is hardly ever about light touches when it gets to my penis.
Sensation once aroused is remarkably similar. One thing I did notice however is that it is a bit more constant/predictable during penetrative sex without the foreskin moving about. It is nice to be able to make out the texture of the vaginal wall during both the inner and the outer strokes. Uncut the sensation was a bit more intense going in and a bit duller pulling out. However, on average it's pretty much the same.
Erections and sexual response did not change, ejaculation did not change, overall sexual function did not change.
Mind you, I had the procedure done electively, as an adult, by a very good plastic surgeon. I understand mileage can vary for routine circumcisions and not all are equal in terms of both approach and technique, so I can't speak fot those men. But in my case, I am happy I did it and wouldn't want to go back to being uncut.
Fine touch sensitivity is a bit down, but not by enough to really matter and at this stage (10+ years cut) it could also be related to ageing and having used it a lot. The difference is minor in any case and for me at least sex is hardly ever about light touches when it gets to my penis.
Sensation once aroused is remarkably similar. One thing I did notice however is that it is a bit more constant/predictable during penetrative sex without the foreskin moving about. It is nice to be able to make out the texture of the vaginal wall during both the inner and the outer strokes. Uncut the sensation was a bit more intense going in and a bit duller pulling out. However, on average it's pretty much the same.
Erections and sexual response did not change, ejaculation did not change, overall sexual function did not change.
Mind you, I had the procedure done electively, as an adult, by a very good plastic surgeon. I understand mileage can vary for routine circumcisions and not all are equal in terms of both approach and technique, so I can't speak fot those men. But in my case, I am happy I did it and wouldn't want to go back to being uncut.
Similar threads
