What do you class as S, M, L, XL?

thatguyonthebike

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Posts
2,689
Media
9
Likes
21,196
Points
333
Location
Spain
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Looking at photos on guys profiles they don't seem to match the size of cock the guy says he has...some look bigger and some smaller. I've classed myself as a M, but have seen lots of guys who look smaller than me but claim they are L. What size cock do you class as S, M, L, and XL (or even XXL)?
 
It may all be relative.

Compared to some of the people here I would be a M, just like you.

However compared to "Mr. Average" We would both be L!
 
I 've somewhere on this board a volume chart, compiled out of the Lifestyle Condoms study.
I define average (Medium) from -1std upto +1std from median.
+1std=large (Large); +2std=very large (XL); +3std=huge (XXL)

In summary :
XS : < 4.2" x 4.0"
S : < 5.0" x 4.4"
M : > 5.0" x 4.4" < 6.6" x 5.4"
L : > 6.6" x 5.4"
XL : > 7.4" x 5.9"
XXL: > 8.2" x 6.4"

( < stands for smaller than; > bigger than )
 
Skewed sample looking at pics from this site. The Visualizer was excellent for comparing size, but requires you to be honest.

Also, it's important to remember that there can be many reasons why some people's cocks look bigger in their picture. Body weight is a good example, angle of photo, how hard they are when the picture is taken, and whether their penis is curved.

Based on the Dirkjesje's stats from this site, I'm just over the XL. Based on the Visualizer, in many categories compared to average, I'm a big boy.
 
Wow, given those numbers from that study, I cant believe anybody would categorize my dick as XL lol

I think its time to have a pic of it..



I 've somewhere on this board a volume chart, compiled out of the Lifestyle Condoms study.
I define average (Medium) from -1std upto +1std from median.
+1std=large (Large); +2std=very large (XL); +3std=huge (XXL)

In summary :
XS : < 4.2" x 4.0"
S : < 5.0" x 4.4"
M : > 5.0" x 4.4" < 6.6" x 5.4"
L : > 6.6" x 5.4"
XL : > 7.4" x 5.9"
XXL: > 8.2" x 6.4"

( < stands for smaller than; > bigger than )
 
I 've somewhere on this board a volume chart, compiled out of the Lifestyle Condoms study.
I define average (Medium) from -1std upto +1std from median.
+1std=large (Large); +2std=very large (XL); +3std=huge (XXL)

In summary :
XS : < 4.2" x 4.0"
S : < 5.0" x 4.4"
M : > 5.0" x 4.4" < 6.6" x 5.4"
L : > 6.6" x 5.4"
XL : > 7.4" x 5.9"
XXL: > 8.2" x 6.4"

( < stands for smaller than; > bigger than )
In a case like mine, that chart emphasizes the pointlessness of trying to summarize a cock with a simple letter grade. Mine falls easily within the longest length category in that list, but it doesn't have the sheer mass someone would expect from an XXL or even XL. My girth falls into the S category, bordering on XS because my cock is relatively flat, but a potential partner would be shocked (and justifiably annoyed) if I told them to expect S or XS.

Even if I split the difference and called it M or L, it wouldn't set the right expectation. Calling it M gives the impression it'll be ordinary, not a cock with wacky-weird dimensions like mine. Nor could I fairly class it as L because that doesn't adequate inform those who care about length (too long) or those who care about girth (too thin).
 
Last edited:
Based on dirkjesje's post I'm XXL in both length and girth. I'm 6'2 though and have really big hands so it always makes my dick look small, at least when I look at it :/
I'm a bit taller than you are so I know the feeling. Everyone else thinks my dick looks big on me, though.
 
Last edited:
I'm a bit taller than you are so I know the feeling. Everyone else thinks my dick looks big on me, though.

Well thats good to hear. Makes me thankful that I'm bigger. Only being 6 inches and over 6 ft probably looks very small, but who knows. I've near been around other guys naked either so I don't have much to compare it to.