When Tops Bottom

Posts Attachments
Sort by date Most Liked Posts
roman28051966 said:
He's not handsome, but somehow he's so hot!!!! Straight vibe or what???
Click to expand...

The Stallion is aka Patrick from FX and BCH, or Montana from MC.
Fratx - Begging Pledge - Justin Maxwell, Patrick, Raymond Jones, Trystan Charmings, Zane Kazan, Theo O'Brien

Beefcakehunter - Hot Straight Bouncer Patrick's First Gay Fuck

Militaryclassified - Hot Straight Marine Montana Creampies Rob


There is another The Stallion aka Troy Stallion. He's hot, and he's versatile on his OF. He did a flip flop with John Bronco, but through the whole scene, there's no penetration shot. It's fake af.

Myfriendsfeet - Lando Worships and Cums on Troy's Bare Feet
 
  • Like
Reactions: pecantan, JustActinUp and bc655
quantum said:
OF will never replace good cameramen. That's my biggest issue with OF sex scenes. They usually just record from a tripod beside the bed, and it makes for boring angles and a boring video...
Click to expand...

Most of OF models have no idea how to film a scene properly or they don't have a cameraman for filming. We've seen too much poor camera work, shaking camera, no close-ups of penetration, fake fucking, bad background light, etc. Even though OF is popular nowadays, I don't think they can replace studio porn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CosmicCoder, bc655 and quantum
quantum said:
OF will never replace good cameramen. That's my biggest issue with OF sex scenes. They usually just record from a tripod beside the bed, and it makes for boring angles and a boring video...
Click to expand...
I disagree, honestly. Lack of a cameraman doesn't cause boring angles and boring videos. Laziness, cheapness, and bad chemistry do. You can have multiple tripods, or shift one tripod around for multiple angles, then edit it together. Some OF/JFF pages even upload multiple copies of the same video with different angles so you can choose your favorite, at no additional cost, but a lot of these OF guys don't want to put that level of effort into their videos. And if the guys have no chemistry, then the lack of effort becomes harder to ignore. People love amateur porn despite the bad lighting and singular camera angles because it has something that studio porn lacks: authenticity. When OF guys have bad, boring sex and then put zero effort into the technical side of things, it's like having all the negative parts of amateur porn with none of the positives.

Though personally I think OF videos are better without a cameraman. OF videos with cameramen don't have the same fly on the wall effect and "porn magic" that studio porn has. It's too obvious that there's a person hovering around the people having sex. You can see and hear them moving around the room, you can see their shadows, you can spot them in mirrors, you can hear them breathing, and their fingers sometimes get in front of the camera lens. I'd take a few well-placed tripods over a cameraman almost every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baileyrose69, SpreadThoseCheeksDC, La Muneca and 1 other person
Alfhiem said:
I disagree, honestly. Lack of a cameraman doesn't cause boring angles and boring videos. Laziness, cheapness, and bad chemistry do. You can have multiple tripods, or shift one tripod around for multiple angles, then edit it together. Some OF/JFF pages even upload multiple copies of the same video with different angles so you can choose your favorite, at no additional cost, but a lot of these OF guys don't want to put that level of effort into their videos. And if the guys have no chemistry, then the lack of effort becomes harder to ignore. People love amateur porn despite the bad lighting and singular camera angles because it has something that studio porn lacks: authenticity. When OF guys have bad, boring sex and then put zero effort into the technical side of things, it's like having all the negative parts of amateur porn with none of the positives.

Though personally I think OF videos are better without a cameraman. OF videos with cameramen don't have the same fly on the wall effect and "porn magic" that studio porn has. It's too obvious that there's a person hovering around the people having sex. You can see and hear them moving around the room, you can see their shadows, you can spot them in mirrors, you can hear them breathing, and their fingers sometimes get in front of the camera lens. I'd take a few well-placed tripods over a cameraman almost every time.
Click to expand...
I honestly prefer studio porn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hyroman
Alfhiem said:
I disagree, honestly. Lack of a cameraman doesn't cause boring angles and boring videos. Laziness, cheapness, and bad chemistry do. You can have multiple tripods, or shift one tripod around for multiple angles, then edit it together. Some OF/JFF pages even upload multiple copies of the same video with different angles so you can choose your favorite, at no additional cost, but a lot of these OF guys don't want to put that level of effort into their videos. And if the guys have no chemistry, then the lack of effort becomes harder to ignore. People love amateur porn despite the bad lighting and singular camera angles because it has something that studio porn lacks: authenticity. When OF guys have bad, boring sex and then put zero effort into the technical side of things, it's like having all the negative parts of amateur porn with none of the positives.

Though personally I think OF videos are better without a cameraman. OF videos with cameramen don't have the same fly on the wall effect and "porn magic" that studio porn has. It's too obvious that there's a person hovering around the people having sex. You can see and hear them moving around the room, you can see their shadows, you can spot them in mirrors, you can hear them breathing, and their fingers sometimes get in front of the camera lens. I'd take a few well-placed tripods over a cameraman almost every time.
Click to expand...
They can all have cameramen. The problem is they want public privacy in the room, same as at sex parties. Why are you doing this for all to see but want a dark room? Honestly, if porn and sex parties converged truly, it would make a lot of money. Sex with a fully non-participating paying audience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jackson4315
Alfhiem said:
I disagree, honestly. Lack of a cameraman doesn't cause boring angles and boring videos. Laziness, cheapness, and bad chemistry do. You can have multiple tripods, or shift one tripod around for multiple angles, then edit it together. Some OF/JFF pages even upload multiple copies of the same video with different angles so you can choose your favorite, at no additional cost, but a lot of these OF guys don't want to put that level of effort into their videos. And if the guys have no chemistry, then the lack of effort becomes harder to ignore. People love amateur porn despite the bad lighting and singular camera angles because it has something that studio porn lacks: authenticity. When OF guys have bad, boring sex and then put zero effort into the technical side of things, it's like having all the negative parts of amateur porn with none of the positives.

Though personally I think OF videos are better without a cameraman. OF videos with cameramen don't have the same fly on the wall effect and "porn magic" that studio porn has. It's too obvious that there's a person hovering around the people having sex. You can see and hear them moving around the room, you can see their shadows, you can spot them in mirrors, you can hear them breathing, and their fingers sometimes get in front of the camera lens. I'd take a few well-placed tripods over a cameraman almost every time.
Click to expand...

Eh, we will have to disagree to disagree. You have to have an awareness of (and eye for) the camera to make good porn. Too many OF creators are skirting by with expensive PPVs that are terribly shot.

Give me Rhyheim's high-quality OF productions any day over what someone like Timothy Champagne produces. I want to see the penetration. I want to see multiple camera angles. I want to see movement. I want a third person to be there to show me that dick going into that hole. Too many guys get away with fake fucking or just bad angles where you can't really see anything. I want to be inside the action. I want pornnn, baby.

I get the whole "fly on the wall fantasy" but it's not for me. I know I'm watching porn and I want to someone to put effort into performing for me if I'm paying for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: suckaforlove, JustActinUp, Manolo J and 4 others
Richard M S said:
Wow but after all those years, Michael Lucas bottoming for the first time (on camera) barely made a ripple.
Click to expand...
All the buzzing about him is negative. He's notorious for exploiting the actors and he always gives me predators vibe like even if the porn actors are sex workers but ML would definitely assault them given the chance at the top of the food chain. He is the bad news and very loud but that confused him as fame and he wanted to cash out it and failed, it's that simple
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbslut, bc655, Fury Wren and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
supporting the community when your wife signs you up.
Replies
1
Views
966
Erotic Stories
Richard Licks
R
M
Caught with the Deputies daughter
Replies
2
Views
1K
Erotic Stories
Mikey22
M
A
Anyone have continuous anal orgasms when they are fucked?
Replies
1
Views
457
General Sexual Discussion
TheInvisibleMan
T
U
Diary of A Slut
Replies
4
Views
996
Erotic Stories
michaelnola
M
M
Photos & Videos Two tops fight for dominance until one gets forced to bottom
Replies
6
Views
2K
Gay Photos and Videos
WarheadGT
W
Top Bottom