Why Doesn't Bone-Pressed Count?

[duderino]

looks mighty close to me... no one ever takes into accout their height/weight and muscle size that add or detract from pics. Especially those without pics Just sayin...

Thank you! That's what she measured. And it correlates with earlier measurements and YES one MUST take one's body size into account.

Now all you other armchair trigonometry + biometrics + physiology + imaging + urology experts out there: Whatever you want to think I am, I'm not complaining! I really don't have anything to prove. I'll let my cock speak for itself.

 

[ShannonH]

I think I'm seen here by some as a 'debunker' or 'skeptic' or something silly, but I really just like to keep things objective. There's enough crap out there where people lie about their size and it totally skews people's perceptions, so naturally most of the time if I see it I will call bullshit on it.
From your pics, yeah I think a little over 9" is pretty reasonable. Girth's tougher to judge, but you look like it's tough to even get in her mouth (kind of a mixed blessing I'll bet), so I don't see a reason to doubt.

I can forgive most people for immediately doubting when the world is so full of 'monster cocks' claiming a foot long that are really just over 7". If my carpenter went by this measurement standard I'd be living in a hobbit's house:
http://x-images4.bangbros.com/monste...rs/450x340.jpghttp://x-images4.bangbros.com/monstersofcock/shoots/mc541/members/450x340.jpg
http://x-images4.bangbros.com/monstersofcock/shoots/mc854/members/450x340.jpg
http://x-images4.bangbros.com/monste...rs/450x340.jpg
http://x-images4.bangbros.com/monste...gbros/big3.jpg
http://x-images4.bangbros.com/monste...gbros/big4.jpg
Every one of those guys from monstersofcock.com is clearly less than 8" if you start their tape at 0 and from the top.
I think when a non-professional couple posts it looks very different and people don't know what to make of it. Frankly I think you're bigger than mandingo and almost 5" taller too, but he'd appear bigger just because of how it's staged.

 

[dirkjesje]

looks mighty close to me... no one ever takes into accout their height/weight and muscle size that add or detract from pics. Especially those without pics Just sayin...

I agree.
I give him certainly a +9" in lenght, but not a 7" midshaft girth, somewhere between 5.75" and 6".
But wow, one to remember...

 

[hijinxy]

Can ladies chirp in with an opinion?

One of the reasons i never bother taking bone-pressed lengths seriously is because when someone jabs the ruler deep into their body fat, you can no longer see the first markings on the small end, ad it would be very easy for any guy obsessed with proving his 8 or 9 inches are real to simply clip off the end of the ruler and no one would ever be able to tell.

The other reason is that though men may feel like they can compress their fat pads when thrusting, the fact is that they will never compress as far by pressing against another soft human body as it seems when jabbing a small, solid object deep into one's body fat.

Bigger guys complain that they "lose" inches, but as someone who has been both small and large, and who has slept with slim and hefty men, the fact is that an increase in body fat does limit penetration to an extent.

On a totally different note, I'm not the most visual person, but that is an aspect that i know lots of people respond to, and no matter how many inches are "hidden" under fat, if there are only 5 inches showing, there simply isn't going to be the visual thrill of being presented with an enormous, commanding cock.

 

[D_Hugh_Jass]

@duderino, if u want to lose that fat faster, google "eat stop eat", it works wonders. u can lose 1.5 kg of fat weekly using that. personally tested.

 

[Infernal]

Can ladies chirp in with an opinion?

One of the reasons i never bother taking bone-pressed lengths seriously is because when someone jabs the ruler deep into their body fat, you can no longer see the first markings on the small end, ad it would be very easy for any guy obsessed with proving his 8 or 9 inches are real to simply clip off the end of the ruler and no one would ever be able to tell.

The other reason is that though men may feel like they can compress their fat pads when thrusting, the fact is that they will never compress as far by pressing against another soft human body as it seems when jabbing a small, solid object deep into one's body fat.

Nice to hear a woman's perspective on this. For me it ranks right up there with the "optical inch" obtained by trimming down the public hair. It's all about perspective.... and a bit of vanity.

 

[drabman]

I think I'm seen here by some as a 'debunker' or 'skeptic' or something silly...

I wouldn't worry. They are invariably the fantasists who have an emotional investment in deluding themselves that either their own dicks, or those of others, have achieved fantastical proportions larger than any recorded in any verifiable manner by anyone, anywhere, at any time.

To others you're seen as eminently sensible, objective and worth reading.

 

[B_penispenispenis37]

Have you people never had sex where you grind on each other? I can get every single goddamn centimeter of my fat-pad-cock inside her.

Not even an issue. It doesn't even have to be grinding.

Oh I better watch out for the gatekeepers of penis measurement, they are going to tell me it is actually 3/4" shorter!

 

[goliath65]

this bpel bullsh1t should of never got started..heard numerous times mostly on pe websites ,dorks claiming to join the 8 inch club, when in fact this bozo pushed the ruler into his fatpad ..bpel should only be used for a pe practioners records not for posting on penis forums. its confuses and misleads guys interested in pe.....NBPEL is king and all that matters. thee end

 

[bassman70]

this bpel bullsh1t should of never got started..heard numerous times mostly on pe websites ,dorks claiming to join the 8 inch club, when in fact this bozo pushed the ruler into his fatpad ..bpel should only be used for a pe practioners records not for posting on penis forums. its confuses and misleads guys interested in pe.....NBPEL is king and all that matters. thee end

I was 155 in h.s. At 43, I'm 185 now. Did my cock shrink 1/2. of an inch? No, it just accumulated some soft fat around the base. That extra bit compresses to the bo.e when I go all the way in. Therefore, it is usable length for me.

 

[House21]

When I was young and the internet wasn't around I remember trying to measure and having no idea if I was doing it the right way. Side? Underside from where the balls meet the base to the tip? Top? Top with the ruler pushed in? It's not like we talked about it in sex ed.

I was also athletic, was 6'2" and 170 lbs. Almost 20 years later I'm carrying 40 extra pounds I didn't have then, and at my heaviest was 80 lbs heavier than in high school. That certainly has an effect on the visual perception of my size.

I think that from the stand point of accuracy and consistency, bone pressed measurement gives the most reliable method of taking measurements across the board. Sure, it might turn a 5.75" into a 6.25", but it works the same for bigger guys too. Realistically, if you can set a ruler on your dick and get anywhere near that 8" mark, you're huge already, bone pressed or not. On my best day I get a bone pressed measurement of 7", so it's not like my length is wowing anyone to begin with. If anyone asks me (which nobody ever does) I say I'm around 6.5"-7" long. At the end of the day I think BPEL is just about having a good consistent starting point so that everyone can be on the same page.

 

[deleted103775]

Bone-pressed does "count." It is more accurate for purposes of comparison. If you are one of those people that think it doesn't count, then you can adjust the numbers accordingly.
Either way I think it's irrelevant, it's a difference of only about 0.5" and if someone claims to be 8 but they're closer to 7.5 it really doesn't matter. Now if you claim to be 9 but you're closer to 7, that's clearly objectionable. Hopefully we can put this debate to rest!

 

[SyddyKitty]

I believe it counts, when tracking gains. I don't care to hear BPEL, though. I'm much more interested in what I can see, in this case. Not what may actually be there.

 

[Exbiker]

I'm thinking of starting up the NPFPSG -

Negligible Pubic Fat Pad Support Group.

Who are all these people carrying around a big lump of fat above their crotch?

Mine's still negligible at 48. I can't even imagine the shame of having it intrude significantly over my penis? And yet people here seem to derive a vicarious pride from it ?

???

 

[emeraldcitysub_74]

If I get a girl REALLY open, I can go balls deep, right down to my pubic bone. That a useable half-inch or so of penis.

Well, some guys have an inch of fat on their pubic bone. As a size queen, I only care about what can get inside. So, I prefer measurement from the crease of skin where the cock begins.

I'm totally willing to participate in positions that get me a deeper dicking , and, I'd like to know the reality of what I'm starting with. If a guy was 8" bone pressed, I wouldn't be as excited ... it just seems like it's not an accurate measurement.

I understand that many people (mostly men) would disagree.