Why don't men climax inside each other?

You can not see when they cum inside of each other, the cum that is, makes for bad porn if you don't see the finale.
 
because porn viewers have been conditioned to "porn sex" and that has become a fantasy itself, its so un-realistic it serves the eye more than the brain. its typical characteristics are:
* un-real repetitive sounds
* as little as possible physical contact to allow better camera shots that show more of the bodies
* external cum-shots to "show/prove" the viewer that the actor actually came
* ridiculous facials where the receiver typically winches in disgust while getting cum on his cheek. or even worse with str8 porn where the female does cum-bubbles with saliva.
* typically limp cocked bottoms that shout like they are in extacy
* typically the most un-confortable and ridiculous sexual positions to showcase variety.

this has created a porn-sex school which a) actually differentiates porn and real sex, and B) makes porn sex "larger than life" so people cannot replicate it and as such is more valuable.
 
because porn viewers have been conditioned to "porn sex" and that has become a fantasy itself, its so un-realistic it serves the eye more than the brain. its typical characteristics are:
* un-real repetitive sounds
* as little as possible physical contact to allow better camera shots that show more of the bodies
* external cum-shots to "show/prove" the viewer that the actor actually came
* ridiculous facials where the receiver typically winches in disgust while getting cum on his cheek. or even worse with str8 porn where the female does cum-bubbles with saliva.
* typically limp cocked bottoms that shout like they are in extacy
* typically the most un-confortable and ridiculous sexual positions to showcase variety.

this has created a porn-sex school which a) actually differentiates porn and real sex, and B) makes porn sex "larger than life" so people cannot replicate it and as such is more valuable.

So true. Well put.

I absolutely hate the exaggerated grunts and groans and the forced masculinity in most gay porn.

There is rarely any affection or loving moments in porn, especially gay porn. It is alienating and devoid of qualities that make sex special and meaningful for most people.
 
because porn viewers have been conditioned to "porn sex" and that has become a fantasy itself, its so un-realistic it serves the eye more than the brain. its typical characteristics are:
* un-real repetitive sounds
* as little as possible physical contact to allow better camera shots that show more of the bodies
* external cum-shots to "show/prove" the viewer that the actor actually came
* ridiculous facials where the receiver typically winches in disgust while getting cum on his cheek. or even worse with str8 porn where the female does cum-bubbles with saliva.
* typically limp cocked bottoms that shout like they are in extacy
* typically the most un-confortable and ridiculous sexual positions to showcase variety.

this has created a porn-sex school which a) actually differentiates porn and real sex, and B) makes porn sex "larger than life" so people cannot replicate it and as such is more valuable.

I use to think that limp-dicked-bottoms-enjoying-being-fucked were unrealistic until my own personal experience.......different stokes (pun intended) lol!
 
why don't gay men just climax and creampie inside their ass? why do they jack off instead of cumming in their ass?

There seems to be a growing interest in seeing that now; verified by the pulsating muscles of the penis when shooting inside the bottom's hole and also pulling out to show the creampie inside.
 
Because HIV is still a threat. Duh.

Excellent answer.... :smile:

Sorry guys, I must, somewhat, disagree in that the practice preceded the AIDS crisis. I know because as a youth discovering porn, well before the recognized outbreak, I noticed the phenomenon then and, as the OP noted, wondered why they pulled out.

When I finally got an answer it was the same as this one:

That's the 'Money Shot' in porn

It is a regular practice in both straight and gay porn.

Now what happens between private consenting adults is primarily preferential:
some want a facial;
some like to be sucked off;
some need to jack off to cum;
some just like to see themselves blow their wad on (pick a location);
some like to cum inside each other.
It is all relative and personal.

The introduction, or increased use of, the condom, however, is definitely a response to HIV infection.
 
Last edited:
because porn viewers have been conditioned to "porn sex" and that has become a fantasy itself, its so un-realistic it serves the eye more than the brain. its typical characteristics are:
* un-real repetitive sounds
* as little as possible physical contact to allow better camera shots that show more of the bodies
* external cum-shots to "show/prove" the viewer that the actor actually came
* ridiculous facials where the receiver typically winches in disgust while getting cum on his cheek. or even worse with str8 porn where the female does cum-bubbles with saliva.
* typically limp cocked bottoms that shout like they are in extacy
* typically the most un-confortable and ridiculous sexual positions to showcase variety.

this has created a porn-sex school which a) actually differentiates porn and real sex, and B) makes porn sex "larger than life" so people cannot replicate it and as such is more valuable.

This is one of the truest things I have ever read. It's one of the reasons why I don't like watching a lot of porn these days anyway. It's just so unrealistic as to make it more of a caricature of sex rather than actual sex.

Climaxing inside the guy is so much hotter anyway.
 
One would assume that they would make sure their models are clean...

Laughing
Out
Loud

+ why would seropositives actors be banned from playing in porn?
In most professional productions, there's a condom involved (though it often appears magically without any transition) and with the treatments even a model who's not "clean" can perform safely.
 
I'd have to agree with most posters here. It's just a porn thing. Totally different in real life.

The only other explanation would be that men are generally more visual in how they like to perceive things. So seeing a load on someone might be more appealing to some than feeling it happen.