Why should stupid people have a vote?

viking1

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Posts
4,600
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Because they are citizens. It's citizenship that gives the right to vote, not how intelligent someone is. Stupidity is so rampant there wouldn't be many voters left if stupid people were excluded.
 

Pecker

Retired Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Posts
54,502
Media
0
Likes
322
Points
283
Not long ago many jurisdictions went out of their way to keep "stupid" people from voting. Back then you only had to be of a different skin color to be "stupid." Thank God that was corrected.

Nowadays you only have to be a member of an opposing political party.
 

Mem

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Posts
7,912
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
183
Location
FL
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
You wouldn't take a stupid person's advice on anything serious, so why do you let them vote on to how your life is affected by government?

Because you may be denied a vote for starting this thread. I'm on the line with Washington now.:wink: I'm kidding of course, but who is to decide what stupid is? You want an IQ test before you press the lever?
 

mindfawk

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Posts
80
Media
41
Likes
87
Points
163
Location
Texas
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Not long ago many jurisdictions went out of their way to keep "stupid" people from voting. Back then you only had to be of a different skin color to be "stupid." Thank God that was corrected.

Nowadays you only have to be a member of an opposing political party.
More true words have never been typed.
 

Principessa

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Posts
18,660
Media
0
Likes
141
Points
193
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Because they are citizens. It's citizenship that gives the right to vote, not how intelligent someone is. Stupidity is so rampant there wouldn't be many voters left if stupid people were excluded.

True, but unless I get to be the one who decides who is too dumb to vote; then it's not a good idea. :smile:
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
41
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Respectfully, I think you have missed my point.

He didn't miss your point at all. As Pecker implied (I think), though he didn't actually say, the reason stupid people get the vote is because who's to say what constitutes stupid? They kept blacks from the polls by introducing literacy tests when most of them (because it was recently illegal to teach them) couldn't read, and they introduced a poll tax when most of them couldn't afford it. Both measures Ann Coulter is in favor of reintroducing.

I think it might be a good idea to test people voting to make sure they are familiar with the issues and the cantidates before they are allowed to cast their ballot, but again, the opportunity for abuse here is too high. Should people be excluded from voting because they believe Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat to national security? Should we turn people away from the polls if they believe 9/11 was an inside job? Large swaths of the population that would vote for one side or the other would be cut out this way, so even if the rest of us think they are ridiculous for believing what they do, it's too easy to introduce bias into a test for voting. If we introduced a test of people's ability to think critically for themselves, that would exclude virtually everyone with a political party affiliation.

Winston Churchill is often credited with the quote though I think he was paraphrasing Ben Frankling when he said, "it has been said Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried." Certainly other forms of government that do not include universal suffrage have long histories of abuse and corruption... but I'm not sure I agree they were necessarily worse. American democracy has been pretty much hopelessly corrupted itself. Because all stupid people *are* allowed to vote, rather than preventing corrupt politicians from staying in office for long as was intended, it has actually become an enabling force for them to do so. Stupid people believe whatever crap the corporations want them to believe, so it comes down to who spends the most advertising dollars, who comes up with the best commercials and slogans, who owns the most radio and cable news programs, and who can come up with the correct formula that will produce speeches and party platforms that appeal to the largest number of stupids while alienating the smallest number. So in theory we have a government by and for the people, while in reality we have a government by and for corporate interests and the military-industrial complex. Our democracy is still controlled by a small number of corrupt individuals, because they are smarter (or at least better informed) and wealthier than most of us they can manipulate the larger system. Really not much has changed.
 

Gillette

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Posts
6,214
Media
4
Likes
95
Points
268
Age
53
Location
Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
You wouldn't take a stupid person's advice on anything serious, so why do you let them vote on to how your life is affected by government?

Because the stupid people voted into power the time before have a vested interest in keeping the system working that way.

Stupidity is self perpetuating.
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,815
Points
333
Location
Greece
He didn't miss your point at all.

Well, actually yes he did, because I was talking about the theory of democracy, not racists manipulating a system, or sexists or any other group for that matter. And not being American, your form of democracy is not my reference point either.

Please let's not talk about the flaws of the IQ system etc, but democratically elected people don't have to convince the smartest people to vote for them.
 

Mem

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Posts
7,912
Media
0
Likes
54
Points
183
Location
FL
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Well, actually yes he did, because I was talking about the theory of democracy, not racists manipulating a system, or sexists or any other group for that matter. And not being American, your form of democracy is not my reference point either.

Please let's not talk about the flaws of the IQ system etc, but democratically elected people don't have to convince the smartest people to vote for them.

the others are called dictators. they want people to be stupid, and deny freedom of the press and freedom of speech.