Ok, I just thought I'd ask this. I am unfamiliar with Trinity's famous posts. I would like to know what Term or Service she violated or what major offense she committed to earn her that status.
Why was Trinity banned?
- Thread starter wispandex_bulge
- Start date
My guess is that his or her postings -- thread after thread of desperately strained anti-Obama crap (and I do mean crap) -- were found to violate the part of the terms of service that I have emphasized below.
These violations are subject to a sanction up to, and rarely including, permanent ban, depending on (cumulative) severity:
The ban may not be permanent, though.- Nude avatars.
- Commercial advertisement, flooding, and other forms of spam.
- Content that jeopardizes the board's legal status.
- Passwords or cracks to LPSG or any other website.
- Harassment of, or threats against, other LPSG members.
- Content whose primary purpose is to disrupt or inflame.
- Senseless or unrecognizable content.
arrivaderciroma
Experimental Member
Trinity was a professional paid operative and as such was flaming this site. She should never be allowed back. I think she may not be a she, either.
Principessa
Expert Member
It was my understanding that she had been warned before that her rants were inflammatory, not to mention often untrue, yet she continued to post things that were getting people extremely agitated and riled up, so she got banned.
arrivaderciroma
Experimental Member
We don't just talk about penises. We discuss everything. That's why she (he) was here.
I just find it hard to believe that someone would be paid to post on lpsg. But you never know.
rawbone8
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Posts
- 2,816
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 299
- Points
- 303
- Location
- Ontario (Canada)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Nah. "She" was doing it pro bono. :wink:
Missionaries with zeal like hers will wade into any cesspool to bash Obama. At first it was couched in being pro-Clinton. Then it was couched in being pro-McCain. The consistent part is that "she" despises Obama, no matter whom he was running against. It gave her a woody.
It's puzzling that she was banned, though. There should be more tolerance here for dissent. She rarely sunk, if ever, to ad hominem attacks or name-calling and did attach links (of varying merit) to support her debate. Perhaps there is something she did to breach the ToS that escapes me but I don't think she should be banned simply for being a contrarian.
The fact of the matter was she was posting at least 3 posts a day bashing Obama (and most of the threads she started were either blantent lies, or the truth skewed to a point of being utter bullshit just piss people off). If I remember correctly, her last thread was about someone sueing Obama to try and get his citizenship revoked. She crossed the line, and posted inflamitory thread after inflamitory thread. Had she of posted/started threads on other subject matter other than bashing Obama, I think she still would be here.
faceking
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2004
- Posts
- 7,407
- Media
- 6
- Likes
- 408
- Points
- 208
- Location
- Mavs, NOR * CAL
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Nah. If you look closely there a few folks out there now who are just as bad with Bush rants.
The mods usually warn someone, and don't ban immediately. So it musta been something repeated is my guess.
D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
I agree, rawbone.
She may have been tiresomely obsessed, but many posters came nowhere near her level.
I have to wonder if there was some other reason for her banning.
- Joined
- May 18, 2004
- Posts
- 17,610
- Media
- 505
- Likes
- 23,938
- Points
- 818
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
Let's investigate the RNC's budget.
TV Advertising
Polling
Media Consultant
Large Penis Web Site
ahh! There it is!
Guess you are right about that one.
invisibleman
Loved Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
- Posts
- 9,802
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 654
- Points
- 303
- Location
- North Carolina
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Trinity is banned? I was looking forward to her glasses of Obama haterade. (After all, she had a right to express herself. )Trinity and other NObama supporters just don't want an intelligent black man in the office. Why not just say that black men shouldn't be President of the United States and call it a day? How America can be this melting pot of races...and never have an African-American president in its entire history of Presidential successions? That is very peculiar.
Wow, its about what I expected. However, I have to say this worries me. I have posted a number of posts criticising Obama. Has anyone ever mentioned ME to a moderator? Would I be banned for sharing information and making commentary JUST because most people on here like Obama? This is a major ethical issue. I agree that you need to maintain a certain sense of decorum in a public place, but you also cannot simply silence dissenters because they dissent. I have applied for the position of moderator myself now.
It also interests me intensely that one moderator: Prepstudindc commented in this post that the reason shojudl be evident in her posts. I should not have to read all of her posts to find the reason. Moreover, if there was a serious infraction, then we shoudl all be allowed to know what it was so that we can all be made more aware of what the rules are AND how they will be enforced.
It also interests me intensely that one moderator: Prepstudindc commented in this post that the reason shojudl be evident in her posts. I should not have to read all of her posts to find the reason. Moreover, if there was a serious infraction, then we shoudl all be allowed to know what it was so that we can all be made more aware of what the rules are AND how they will be enforced.
B_Nick4444
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2007
- Posts
- 6,842
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 144
- Points
- 283
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
TurkeyWithaSunburn
Legendary Member
I posted this in another thread
http://www.lpsg.org/104219-theyre-really-cleaning-house-around.html#post1728659
Go review her posting history and it really should be obvious...
I'd say 815 posts and only 15 of them NOT having to do with politics is a good reason.
TOS Section 3.
Content whose primary purpose is to disrupt or inflame.
Senseless or unrecognizable content.
For God's sake it is a board about a large penis. Post all you want politically but at least occasionally talk about penis. Or stick to more non controversially issues.
Her interests are better served by other more political forums, arenas, and boards.
http://www.lpsg.org/104219-theyre-really-cleaning-house-around.html#post1728659
Go review her posting history and it really should be obvious...
I'd say 815 posts and only 15 of them NOT having to do with politics is a good reason.
TOS Section 3.
Content whose primary purpose is to disrupt or inflame.
Senseless or unrecognizable content.
For God's sake it is a board about a large penis. Post all you want politically but at least occasionally talk about penis. Or stick to more non controversially issues.
Her interests are better served by other more political forums, arenas, and boards.
rawbone8
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Posts
- 2,816
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 299
- Points
- 303
- Location
- Ontario (Canada)
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
:biggrin1:
That would be an apt pun — except "she" had scant interest in dick, except for that woody "she" had for derisive posts on Obama.
Last edited:
