i see it happen so often in here. women thinking that they know who they are talking to and assuming that they know how he thinks and how men think. there is the " mansplaining " but at the same time there is the " womansplaining " also.
i see it happen so often in here. women thinking that they know who they are talking to and assuming that they know how he thinks and how men think. there is the " mansplaining " but at the same time there is the " womansplaining " also.
I see your thread title of "Womansplaining". Coupled with this opening post. From which I cannot ascertain what is your goal for discussion here? Especially since you also introduce "mansplaining". What exactly is this thread about? Do you have a specific point or question to share that could help generate the topical discussion you had in mind?
It would be helpful if you were to provide some specific points or examples of exactly what you wish this thread to accomplish/discuss. Simply put, what is your intent for this thread? Once you elucidate exactly what you want to talk about, some salient discussion can/will ensue.
Otherwise I see this thread going off the rails rather early unless you care to better illuminate your point and purpose of this thread.
I already stated what this thread is about. Much like women get " mad " when men represent them and speaking on their behalf assuming that they know how woman/women think, much the same way women behave here they are adamant on knowing how men think and what the motives behind a post being made here, when in all honesty they don't really know the person ( man ) behind the post because they don't know him personally. So yeah it's a bit hypocritical when they are getting mad when at the same time they are equal chance offender.