Best Onlyfans / Justforfans Accounts

Posts Attachments
Sort by date Most Liked Posts
sisterbroadway said:
View attachment 12958261 (Not gonna day his name for obvious reasons) but doesn’t anybody know if his OF is actually worth it? I have my doubts but just wanna double check
Click to expand...
Everthing is practically free on the internet, don't see the reason why someone would pay for it.
 
Jess13 said:
Didn't someone have to pay for it to be practically free on the internet? If nobody shared what they bought, you would have to pay or do without. Don't take free for granted.
Click to expand...
I've been following Nick Sandell for years, even before OF ever existed and his nudes were not from a paid site, they were from agents, magazines, and even his personal pictures he published out without intention to make any $$ perhaps.
 
Laryderlb said:
I've been following Nick Sandell for years, even before OF ever existed and his nudes were not from a paid site, they were from agents, magazines, and even his personal pictures he published out without intention to make any $$ perhaps.
Click to expand...
You dug really deep to support you're argument, but this is not evidence that "everything is practically free". I'm pretty sure none of the material you mention were explicit. I also think it's highly unlikely copyright infringement wasn't a part of the availability.

Which magazine would pay people to do nude/photoshoots without the expectation of making money from it? Nick gets posted here and he gets deleted because he wants to make money from what he creates.
 
Jess13 said:
You dug really deep to support you're argument, but this is not evidence that "everything is practically free". I'm pretty sure none of the material you mention were explicit. I also think it's highly unlikely copyright infringement wasn't a part of the availability.

Which magazine would pay people to do nude/photoshoots without the expectation of making money from it? Nick gets posted here and he gets deleted because he wants to make money from what he creates.
Click to expand...
Nick used to have a Twitter account with lots of risqué photos way before onlyfans, he moved most of his material to OF to make a profit but before that, it was on twitter and I, o anyone else, paid a penny to see his endowment.
 
Laryderlb said:
Nick used to have a Twitter account with lots of risqué photos way before onlyfans, he moved most of his material to OF to make a profit but before that, it was on twitter and I, o anyone else, paid a penny to see his endowment.
Click to expand...
Nick doesn't represent the entire internet. Used to have a Twitter account. Now he doesn't. His stuff is no longer free. Bottomline is respect the people who pay for content so you get it for free. Respect the people who risk getting banned so you can get it for free. Free is not a right. It's a privilege.
 
Jess13 said:
Nick doesn't represent the entire internet. Used to have a Twitter account. Now he doesn't. His stuff is no longer free. Bottomline is respect the people who pay for content so you get it for free. Respect the people who risk getting banned so you can get it for free. Free is not a right. It's a privilege.
Click to expand...
It was free for me then, it is free for me now.
And respect for copyright infringement? So under your logic I have to thank a bank rober who later bought lollipops for kids in the neighborhood because he risked arm and limb. Dude, get a life.
 
Laryderlb said:
It was free for me then, it is free for me now.
And respect for copyright infringement? So under your logic I have to thank a bank rober who later bought lollipops for kids in the neighborhood because he risked arm and limb. Dude, get a life.
Click to expand...
If the account no longer exists, there's nothing new to be free for you. Anyway, you like to hear yourself talk even if it makes no sense. I get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Remove Ads
Top Bottom