6
6798491
Guest
And one of the Justin Bieber posts was reported!Why did you report my Greg Rutherford post? He dropped trou to show his buttocks!
I was so mad about that!
And one of the Justin Bieber posts was reported!Why did you report my Greg Rutherford post? He dropped trou to show his buttocks!
And one of the Justin Bieber posts was reported!
I was so mad about that!
So, so true.Some people literally get mad about posting an ass that wasn't "mooning", even though mooning is basically showing off your butt. But I have to be careful: otherwise someone will post more screenshots of the definition of mooning from Wikipedia (as if that is some kind of authority on gay perspectives on the display of male asses!). Purists, on a porn site, are really very odd people.
I never knew who he was before now.I mean when it comes to this topic, I’d rather stick to the definition because that’s why I come here! If I wanted celeb boy butts I’d just google that. Not to say you don’t contribute a lot, I’m here for the framing of mooning and even half mooning (as in the photo below) Here’s some Charlie Gillespie! View attachment 87803381View attachment 87803391
Y’all okay some clarification on what I personally mean. We have threads for a reason and off topic stuff here and there is fine but we all have specific likes and dislikes. You wouldn’t go posting cock on an ass thread, so when we have a mooning thread I’d like to keep to the trend. Otherwise I’d look more at “straight guys showing of” thread. It’s hard enough to find mooning content as is, but when people are just posting ass you’re missing the point. Yes, mooning is showing butt, but not all butts are mooning.
View attachment 87834181
this is one form of mooning. Classic, well framed. The display of one’s buttocks for humorous value.
View attachment 87834201
this is also mooning. slight bend over focus on the butt.
View attachment 87834171
this is not
View attachment 87834191
And this is not - it’s straight guys getting naked and showing off. While yes, still hot, I would look for this in the “straight guys showing off” thread.
View attachment 87834151
this one is a bit of grey area. However in terms of intentions and framing of the photo he is purposefully displaying his butt, and that’s the focus of the photo.
I’m not here to be a “puritan” or police exactly what mooning is. We all love ass that’s why we’re on the thread, I just want to focus on the mooning!
You’re not wrong though. On a mooning thread I want to see mooning not just ass presented in any sort of way. I follow general ass threads for that. When I want mooning I want…..mooningY’all okay some clarification on what I personally mean. We have threads for a reason and off topic stuff here and there is fine but we all have specific likes and dislikes. You wouldn’t go posting cock on an ass thread, so when we have a mooning thread I’d like to keep to the trend. Otherwise I’d look more at “straight guys showing of” thread. It’s hard enough to find mooning content as is, but when people are just posting ass you’re missing the point. Yes, mooning is showing butt, but not all butts are mooning.
View attachment 87834181
this is one form of mooning. Classic, well framed. The display of one’s buttocks for humorous value.
View attachment 87834201
this is also mooning. slight bend over focus on the butt.
View attachment 87834171
this is not
View attachment 87834191
And this is not - it’s straight guys getting naked and showing off. While yes, still hot, I would look for this in the “straight guys showing off” thread.
View attachment 87834151
this one is a bit of grey area. However in terms of intentions and framing of the photo he is purposefully displaying his butt, and that’s the focus of the photo.
I’m not here to be a “puritan” or police exactly what mooning is. We all love ass that’s why we’re on the thread, I just want to focus on the mooning!
Who is this? He thick
It's not a question of puritannical or not. It's a question that there already exists 2-3 threads for simple ass pics and, honestly, maybe a bit too many mooning threads for how small most of them are. Not following the thread's subject just makes them completely obsolete. If you wanted to look at, say, Chris Hemsworth, and had someone posting a million photos of his brother in his thread, it could become annoying. They may have similarities, and you could even find them both in the same photo at times, but that's not what you're looking for, and if you were looking for his brother, you'd look for his name instead.So, so true.
Puritannical thinking is dull and boring.