Evidence for this comes from the UK, where circumcision was common until the National Health Service stopped paying for it, at which time the rate dropped to about two percent.
Over the past two or three months I have met at least 10 guys - all in their early 20's, who have decided to get circumcised. None of them needed to - they all had good healthy cocks from small to impressive in size.
The only guy I was able to ask, said that he was doing it because his American b/f insisted that he lose his foreskin. A bit severe, I think!
Is this circumcision thing a new trend?
I can't see why people want to lose their foreskin. I love mine, I love other guys foreskins - they're so much fun.
If anyone has recently chosen to be circumcised let us know why. Are you glad that you did it? What difference has it made? Does your cock feel better and look better?
And please, don't go on about the old hygiene thing. A well looked after uncut cock can be just as clean and hygienic as a cut one!
I am curious.
Just like Pavlov's Dog, whenever uncut or foreskin is mentioned, a certain faction has to mention smell, stench, puking, etc.
Always.
To Sargon20:
(I don't know how to quote from other posts.)
The year the NHS quite paying, the circ rate dropped precipitously. I can think of no better evidence.
I'm referring to the claim of sensitivity lost.
I disagree. Another group also qualified to comment is those who have restored their foreskins. It's not a perfect comparison but it counts. Safe-to-say, most of those prefer having a foreskin.... only men who have had BOTH the uncircumcised and circumcised penis as adults are truly QUALIFIED to judge and make truly VALID comments on this intimate question ...
For the record, you're the first in-this-thread to mention mutilate/mutilation. Perhaps you don't know: that is a "hot button" word that gets the pro-cut group agitated. Just as smell/stench gets the pro-foreskin group agitated.... so please let's be calm and rational - it is NO MORE a MUTILATION ...
only men who have had BOTH the uncircumcised and circumcised penis as adults are truly QUALIFIED to judge and make truly VALID comments on this intimate question (so all the judgments concerning increased/decreased sexual pleasure or sensitivity etc. etc. should really best be left to those WHO KNOW BY EXPERIENCING BOTH THE BEFORE AND AFTER!)
People who were cut as adults are really the only ones who can speak from experience, since they've been on both sides of the scalpel.
I consider this circumcision thing stupid.
If people were cut when born, then I just feel sorry for them, but if it's their choice, then I just don't get it...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.