That's a ridiculous understanding of how natural selection works. Having a foreskin doesn't kill you. Just like tooth decay, bad backs, knees, hips, and eyesight deterioration. None of these kill you before you've had the chance to reproduce, which is how evolution works.
You claim nature supports yours. Nature doesn't always equal better. Nature made much smaller fruit, we made them larger, we made strawberries red, and inedible bananas edible. Humans improved upon nature, at least to suit our own purposes.
Also, unlike you, I speak from experience. I have lived with a foreskin, and a circumcision.
At the end of the day, you have your opinion and we have ours. I won't be responding pro-foreskin trolls on here after this post, for the same reason I don't troll uncut themed threads. I'm not that desperate or insecure to go do so.
Science supports our position there's clear health benefits to circumcision.the so called health benefits would have been enforcing men with naturally less and less foreskin through time, and we'd all have had very little to none foreskin if there were any serious benefits.
You claim nature supports yours. Nature doesn't always equal better. Nature made much smaller fruit, we made them larger, we made strawberries red, and inedible bananas edible. Humans improved upon nature, at least to suit our own purposes.
Also, unlike you, I speak from experience. I have lived with a foreskin, and a circumcision.
At the end of the day, you have your opinion and we have ours. I won't be responding pro-foreskin trolls on here after this post, for the same reason I don't troll uncut themed threads. I'm not that desperate or insecure to go do so.