Circumsized guys.

[B_Morning_Glory]

How COULD I forget? They diagnosis and treat gullible 'patients' over the internet. But these doctors are very special doctors. Doctors with no degrees. Doctors with zero training and zero experience. Quacks really :smile:

quack (kwăk) http://content.answers.com/main/content/img/pron.gif

n.

1. An untrained person who pretends to be a physician and dispenses medical advice and treatment.
2. A charlatan; a mountebank.

couldn't have put it better about them if i tried. am looking forward to seeing where they have been sued or in a suit for malpractice LOL. you thank maybe they weren't taught that word in their med school? or maybe another called medical license perhaps?

 

[karldergrosse]

Now that's a shocker. I thought I could pick one up at Wal-Mart. They do have everything.

I surrender! What else can one do but bow down before such a superior intellect that can wrench a meaningful statement [Link 8] completely out of context in an asinine attempt at sophomoric "humor"? After all, its a tried and true "debate" tactic that never fails to wow the idiot gallery.....

 

[deleted15807]

Certainly, as I've said earlier, that could have been just the individual...but I'm sure that was not the case. Again, as a rule, U's appear able to reach orgasm, by whatever means, more easily and more quickly than C's...and without the near torture of the head that some men seem to have to apply. Gay men will have observed this phenomenon already. Straights can get an idea of it by watching a number of videos, preferably gay ones for the larger number of cocks.

You write this and you expect to be taken seriously? So now we are to watch videos and extrapolate what we see in pornographic movies as 'proof' of something? Yes you can't be serious.

Let's review the scientific method.

The steps of the scientific method are to:

• Ask a Question
• Do Background Research
• Construct a Hypothesis
• Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
• Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
• Communicate Your Results

You exclude yourself from the idiot gallery? You are the star attraction in the gallery. So excuse me if I didn't respond in kind. I really hope you do surrender and go back to Science 101.

 

[karldergrosse]

My last response to an inferior intellect that can "debate" only in terms of ad-hominem invective and non sequitur: Reread your own opinionated, nonsensical, unsupported claims (if you can stomach them)--then you'll see how badly you need to go (for the first time, obviously) to Science 101 and study the scientific method that you so carefully lay out above. Don't forget Logic 101, either. And no, you certainly don't "respond in kind"--you always establish the "kind" that no one is supposed to toss back at you. ~ But as I've said, this is my last reply to someone with an IQ about equal to his shoe size. --And that, dear fellow, will let you get in the last nasty word, won't it...??? That, at least, should please you...............

 

[darkbond007]

Yeah, we know you haven't been desensitized (your tunnel vision in regards to that). You enunciate the reasons I say genital cutting is cultural pretty well. People don't individually decide, "One day I'm going to start cutting sensitive bits off my babies." They definitely do it because of culture. Or not, definitely because of culture.

You are a very intelligent person and our views on genital cutting are not radically different. I'm not sure why you are trying to pick a fight over semantics.

I havent been desensitized. PERIOD.
You only say its cultural because of its prominence in the USA. But youre right it is a play on semantics and I think the argument is bigger than that.

I think our views on circumcision are different. I don't argue on RIC because I have no grounds to argue on it with. There just is no supporting evidence anywhere to take either side on it so I rather not. Personally, I am indifferent to it because I was left intact and had 24 years of a relationship with my uncut penis. About 22 of those years I was content.

I am a big supporter of adult circumcision only when it is absolutely necessary. I am a big supporter of people KNOWING how their penis should TRULY function and not being content with is irregularities when quite honestly there are a plethora of solutions for them. Surely the decision I made was definitive and while you and others may not like it, I do. However, that is not to say that I would tell everyone out there to go and get circumcised. If my foreskin was fine I would still have it.

I can only share my story and my opinion on it, but where we clash is this whole "circumcision is the worst thing in the world" argument you guys have. That's what gets me riled up.

 

[deleted15807]

My last response to an inferior intellect that can "debate" only in terms of ad-hominem invective ....................blahhhhhhhh

Huum you can't even defend your own statement that watching pornography is proof of some phenomenon. Do all intactivists just conjure up proof out of thin air?

And I am sure it's your 'last response' as your 'argument' is completely unproven and cannot be proven. Now run along to your fellow 'intactivists' for console in your 'fact free' world. I'm sure you all can watch some more pornography for proof of anything you wish.