criss strokes real measurement!! 6.5 INCHES!!!

Criss Strokes got plenty of measured picts and hes never more than 7.5 (nbp) ... far from 10, check the measured pornstar thread for the picts

Also when you measure a penis, you start at the base (not the side) and use a hard ruler
 
Criss Strokes got plenty of measured picts and hes never more than 7.5 (nbp) ... far from 10, check the measured pornstar thread for the picts

Also when you measure a penis, you start at the base (not the side) and use a hard ruler

Who told you those were "the rules?"
 
Its the scientific way to measure a penis, just check on the net.

It's an arbitrary "rule" that doesn't take into account the differences and uniqueness in our anatomies and so this makes it unscientific. Like I have said about Chris' own penis, it has a certain curvature that I have not seen in any other dick and the sheer size of it that's actually twice longer than the average one also makes the curvature more significant. Think about it, a curvature in a 4-inch penis is not gonna cover as much ground as one twice its length. Using a straight measuring device only measures the radius of the semicircle of the curved penis, which is significantly shorter than the actual length of it that does the actual PENETRATION in sex. The receiver doesn't feel 6.5 or 7 inches of the radius of Chris' dick (which is nonsensical) coming in but the full length of its flesh (not an imaginary line! Lol), which could be between 10 to 11 inches for him per comparison of ita visuals with my experience. That is what needs to be measured because THAT SENSATION is what really matters when we talk of penile length. There is actually not even any reason to measure it at all along with all the sexual competition and hierarchy the number connotes besides this singular literal significance. What will make the measurements scientific is to make them standard so you're not measuring one guy while he's standing up and using a ruler while you use a tape measure for another while he sits like Chris in the porn scene. That makes the whole comparison unfair and invalid. And that's unscientific

I actually found a lot of the comments here ridiculous and hilarious when they make such blanket statements that are rooted more on envy and ignorance than real knowledge. Like when they say "porn inches are not real inches." Lmao!!! How many of you have actually seen, touched, sucked and measured/estimated porn star dicks? I've actually had several and they include, like I said, other straight porn stars like Mark Ashley and Jack Lawrence whose cocks are very much within the ballpark stats of Chris'. As you can see from my examples, I know what 8.5 and 9 inch dicks look and feel like (actually up to 10 and 11 but I just didn't take those pics). So i have the unique perspective of estimating from their photos and videos and then being able to actually confirm my estimates in person. In reality, video has the tendency to give the illusion of making small objects appear larger and vice versa, so I was actually even nicely surprised/shocked at how their dicks were still larger than I expected, contrary to the common presumptions here. This wholesale generalization based on highly erroneous measurements is nothing but fallacious rationalization empowered by attempts to deal irrationally with inherent penis envy, which is part of human nature and unsurprising.
 
It's an arbitrary "rule" that doesn't take into account the differences and uniqueness in our anatomies and so this makes it unscientific. Like I have said about Chris' own penis, it has a certain curvature that I have not seen in any other dick and the sheer size of it that's actually twice longer than the average one also makes the curvature more significant. Think about it, a curvature in a 4-inch penis is not gonna cover as much ground as one twice its length. Using a straight measuring device only measures the radius of the semicircle of the curved penis, which is significantly shorter than the actual length of it that does the actual PENETRATION in sex. The receiver doesn't feel 6.5 or 7 inches of the radius of Chris' dick (which is nonsensical) coming in but the full length of its flesh (not an imaginary line! Lol), which could be between 10 to 11 inches for him per comparison of ita visuals with my experience. That is what needs to be measured because THAT SENSATION is what really matters when we talk of penile length. There is actually not even any reason to measure it at all along with all the sexual competition and hierarchy the number connotes besides this singular literal significance. What will make the measurements scientific is to make them standard so you're not measuring one guy while he's standing up and using a ruler while you use a tape measure for another while he sits like Chris in the porn scene. That makes the whole comparison unfair and invalid. And that's unscientific

I actually found a lot of the comments here ridiculous and hilarious when they make such blanket statements that are rooted more on envy and ignorance than real knowledge. Like when they say "porn inches are not real inches." Lmao!!! How many of you have actually seen, touched, sucked and measured/estimated porn star dicks? I've actually had several and they include, like I said, other straight porn stars like Mark Ashley and Jack Lawrence whose cocks are very much within the ballpark stats of Chris'. As you can see from my examples, I know what 8.5 and 9 inch dicks look and feel like (actually up to 10 and 11 but I just didn't take those pics). So i have the unique perspective of estimating from their photos and videos and then being able to actually confirm my estimates in person. In reality, video has the tendency to give the illusion of making small objects appear larger and vice versa, so I was actually even nicely surprised/shocked at how their dicks were still larger than I expected, contrary to the common presumptions here. This wholesale generalization based on highly erroneous measurements is nothing but fallacious rationalization empowered by attempts to deal irrationally with inherent penis envy, which is part of human nature and unsurprising.
It seems you have forgotten. Pornstars are just as human as the rest of us. No supernatural abilities, and with how you seem to hold them on such a rather high pedestal you can start a new religion if you're up for it. Everything you've posted here can go into your book of worship and I'll be sure to give it a good read. But my review will come now. One inch, 1", 2.54 centimeters. That is quite a large difference in anything regarding anatomy. I can tell you for certain if Criss Strokes, the man who has the name that starts war-like arguments, had even a 8" it would look bigger than it does now. When measuring a penis with a curve it is best to measure both sides of it and average it out. That resulting measurement will be the actual true length of it if it were to be measured with a ruler and perfectly straight. Sitting, standing, the tilting of the hips, and angles can all affect the perception of a measurement. The reason there is a "scientific" way to measure is to make sure it's more fair because the pelvic bone should be in the same place for most humans, no matter how high or low of a fat percentage one has or how much fat someone has in that one area. That's BPEL as you should know. The measurements you posted had shown that some of them started from the balls and even pressed into the sack a bit. I saw one where the measuring tape was tilted a certain way which it not yield the actual size, not matter how much someone would want it to. In the Measured Pornstars thread they use NBPEL which is the measurement that is shown without pressing into the junction of the pelvis and penis. Because it is very, very hard to tell how much fat someone has based on their body shape and fitness level alone. It's up to genetics where the fat will be distributed to the most. Some guy could have a 12% body fat percentage and weigh 120 something and somehow have a fat pad of 1". It's been seen before. The human eye can be trained to be able to find the length of something and actually have it be near correct or spot on. Even difference of 0.5" can be visible when comparing male pornstars from images alone, from a screencap or in the video itself. It's also good to be trained in spotting edits in photoshop. Porn inches are indeed a real thing. And as humans we spread information be it factual or misleading. So naturally it poured into the rest of the media, society, and human mind. Especially here where many people believe bigger everything on the human body is better. People often fall short and end up being quite receptive of the false reality and simply live it. It appears you've fallen into the cracks. To prove the reality that has caused many men to lie about their sizes, their partners to lie about them, and the feeling of inadequacy to continue spreading to be facts. And so the negative cycle continues. It's why we're here. The feeling of inadequacy. But we don't want that feeling of superiority though. I can only hope that you free yourself and not become not just a victim of this but a supporter and spreader.
Edit: Just to add, this is a prime example.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bigdickpro...ost_and_insecure_now_im_in_a_weird_situation/
 
It seems you have forgotten. Pornstars are just as human as the rest of us. No supernatural abilities, and with how you seem to hold them on such a rather high pedestal you can start a new religion if you're up for it. Everything you've posted here can go into your book of worship and I'll be sure to give it a good read. But my review will come now. One inch, 1", 2.54 centimeters. That is quite a large difference in anything regarding anatomy. I can tell you for certain if Criss Strokes, the man who has the name that starts war-like arguments, had even a 8" it would look bigger than it does now. When measuring a penis with a curve it is best to measure both sides of it and average it out. That resulting measurement will be the actual true length of it if it were to be measured with a ruler and perfectly straight. Sitting, standing, the tilting of the hips, and angles can all affect the perception of a measurement. The reason there is a "scientific" way to measure is to make sure it's more fair because the pelvic bone should be in the same place for most humans, no matter how high or low of a fat percentage one has or how much fat someone has in that one area. That's BPEL as you should know. The measurements you posted had shown that some of them started from the balls and even pressed into the sack a bit. I saw one where the measuring tape was tilted a certain way which it not yield the actual size, not matter how much someone would want it to. In the Measured Pornstars thread they use NBPEL which is the measurement that is shown without pressing into the junction of the pelvis and penis. Because it is very, very hard to tell how much fat someone has based on their body shape and fitness level alone. It's up to genetics where the fat will be distributed to the most. Some guy could have a 12% body fat percentage and weigh 120 something and somehow have a fat pad of 1". It's been seen before. The human eye can be trained to be able to find the length of something and actually have it be near correct or spot on. Even difference of 0.5" can be visible when comparing male pornstars from images alone, from a screencap or in the video itself. It's also good to be trained in spotting edits in photoshop. Porn inches are indeed a real thing. And as humans we spread information be it factual or misleading. So naturally it poured into the rest of the media, society, and human mind. Especially here where many people believe bigger everything on the human body is better. People often fall short and end up being quite receptive of the false reality and simply live it. It appears you've fallen into the cracks. To prove the reality that has caused many men to lie about their sizes, their partners to lie about them, and the feeling of inadequacy to continue spreading to be facts. And so the negative cycle continues. It's why we're here. The feeling of inadequacy. But we don't want that feeling of superiority though. I can only hope that you free yourself and not become not just a victim of this but a supporter and spreader.
Edit: Just to add, this is a prime example.
https://www.reddit.com/r/bigdickpro...ost_and_insecure_now_im_in_a_weird_situation/

The first sentence of your piece was nothing but WHINING and a pointless EMOTIONAL OUTBURST. So sorry, I didn't bother reading the rest of that drivel. The appeal to "porn stars are human also" or whatever that tactic is just among the long list of cliché logical fallacies employed by people thinking that it's some sort of "legit argument." I have painstakingly presented logical reasoning on why I am taking this stand, not the least of which is that 1. I SAID THAT I HAVE PUT THOSE PORN STAR DICKS IN MY HANDS AND HOLES THAT YOU PEOPLE RIDICULE WITHOUT A CLUE ON THE TRUTH and so have a unique perspective on this topic that makes me the only one actually qualified to assess their claims or believed sizes and 2. like I said, I am not a size queen so bigger is not necessarily better for me and in fact made a point of praising Robbie9's cock as being more of my ideal size, that even if Danny or anybody else who might have a bigger monster is not attractive to me. And so your assertion that I am defending porn stars because I think they're in some sort of "higher pedestal" for me is simply false. In fact, the guy with the smallest dick in my set of pictures (the one with the real 6.5 inches) is my favorite because he is fucking sexy and gorgeous and has a great personality. If you want me to take you seriously and for your opinions to actually hold water, please TRY to directly address my points of logic to avoid making a fool of yourself. Unless you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Strokes and all the others you think are shorter than claimed, don't bother. Try proving that the screenshots I posted of his dick should be almost the same size as the smaller dicks in my pictures, why don't you? Lol. That's all you need to do actually.

This thread is probably the most hilarious and ridiculous this site has ever had since I started coming here years ago. Lmao!! And I thought it couldn't possibly get worse.
 
The first sentence of your piece was nothing but WHINING and a pointless EMOTIONAL OUTBURST. So sorry, I didn't bother reading the rest of that drivel. The appeal to "porn stars are human also" or whatever that tactic is just among the long list of cliché logical fallacies employed by people thinking that it's some sort of "legit argument." I have painstakingly presented logical reasoning on why I am taking this stand, not the least of which is that 1. I SAID THAT I HAVE PUT THOSE PORN STAR DICKS IN MY HANDS AND HOLES THAT YOU PEOPLE RIDICULE WITHOUT A CLUE ON THE TRUTH and so have a unique perspective on this topic that makes me the only one actually qualified to assess their claims or believed sizes and 2. like I said, I am not a size queen so bigger is not necessarily better for me and in fact made a point of praising Robbie9's cock as being more of my ideal size, that even if Danny or anybody else who might have a bigger monster is not attractive to me. And so your assertion that I am defending porn stars because I think they're in some sort of "higher pedestal" for me is simply false. In fact, the guy with the smallest dick in my set of pictures (the one with the real 6.5 inches) is my favorite because he is fucking sexy and gorgeous and has a great personality. If you want me to take you seriously and for your opinions to actually hold water, please TRY to directly address my points of logic to avoid making a fool of yourself. Unless you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Strokes and all the others you think are shorter than claimed, don't bother. Try proving that the screenshots I posted of his dick should be almost the same size as the smaller dicks in my pictures, why don't you? Lol. That's all you need to do actually.

This thread is probably the most hilarious and ridiculous this site has ever had since I started coming here years ago. Lmao!! And I thought it couldn't possibly get worse.
As if you have any logical reasoning to begin with? I hate to break it to you but "holding pornstar dicks in my hands" isn't going to get you necessarily far in an argument. You clearly do hold these people up on some sort of pedestal.
 
It seems you have forgotten. Pornstars are just as human as the rest of us. No supernatural abilities, and with how you seem to hold them on such a rather high pedestal you can start a new religion if you're up for it. Everything you've posted here can go into your book of worship and I'll be sure to give it a good read. But my review will come now. One inch, 1", 2.54 centimeters. That is quite a large difference in anything regarding anatomy. I can tell you for certain if Criss Strokes, the man who has the name that starts war-like arguments, had even a 8" it would look bigger than it does now. When measuring a penis with a curve it is best to measure both sides of it and average it out. That resulting measurement will be the actual true length of it if it were to be measured with a ruler and perfectly straight. Sitting, standing, the tilting of the hips, and angles can all affect the perception of a measurement. The reason there is a "scientific" way to measure is to make sure it's more fair because the pelvic bone should be in the same place for most humans, no matter how high or low of a fat percentage one has or how much fat someone has in that one area. That's BPEL as you should know. The measurements you posted had shown that some of them started from the balls and even pressed into the sack a bit. I saw one where the measuring tape was tilted a certain way which it not yield the actual size, not matter how much someone would want it to. In the Measured Pornstars thread they use NBPEL which is the measurement that is shown without pressing into the junction of the pelvis and penis. Because it is very, very hard to tell how much fat someone has based on their body shape and fitness level alone. It's up to genetics where the fat will be distributed to the most. Some guy could have a 12% body fat percentage and weigh 120 something and somehow have a fat pad of 1". It's been seen before. The human eye can be trained to be able to find the length of something and actually have it be near correct or spot on. Even difference of 0.5" can be visible when comparing male pornstars from images alone, from a screencap or in the video itself. It's also good to be trained in spotting edits in photoshop. Porn inches are indeed a real thing. And as humans we spread information be it factual or misleading. So naturally it poured into the rest of the media, society, and human mind. Especially here where many people believe bigger everything on the human body is better. People often fall short and end up being quite receptive of the false reality and simply live it. It appears you've fallen into the cracks. To prove the reality that has caused many men to lie about their sizes, their partners to lie about them, and the feeling of inadequacy to continue spreading to be facts. And so the negative cycle continues. It's why we're here. The feeling of inadequacy. But we don't want that feeling of superiority though. I can only hope that you free yourself and not become not just a victim of this but a supporter and spreader.
Edit: Just to add, this is a prime example.
I’m lost and insecure, now I’m in a weird situation. : bigdickproblems

Just looked at your profile briefly and noted that you're "100% straight." If that is true, have you actually seen and held (much less measured and had sex with) even one erect penis other than yours up close? What makes you qualified to assess dick sizes not only from visuals alone but also through the lens of a camera? Because I have been using pics and videos sent to me by guys to compare with their actual ones in person and actually measuring them for like a decade now, I've developed a skill of being able to guesstimate what the ballpark numbers would be from visuals of photos and videos alone that I have found quite accurate. The most common lengths are from 5 to 8. Above 8 is unusual and above 9 is rare. Obviously anything over 10 is probably in the 98/99 percentile so I am never more sure when it's a 9, 10 and above or anything below 6. I guess the ranges I find hardest to be really sure just basing on photos would be between 6.5 and 7.5 and between 7.5 and 8.5. I just know for sure Stroke's cock is at the very least a 9 or 10 based on the pics I posted. That is the reasoning for my level of confidence. And because we're all just using the same visuals, anything that contradicts my own estimate, especially when it's ridiculous as a difference of 4 INCHES (for those insisting that it's just around 6.5 or 7), I of course could not possibly take seriously since i have come to trust my own skill not due to personal bias but from the experience of being right all the time after years of practice. So to say that this is only because i "worship" them, as if big cocks were the only thing I required is beyond idiotic. Lol. It's like saying auto mechanics who can diagnose most car problems from the sound of alone after years of experience are only doing it because they worship BMWs, nevermind that they're diagnosing and fixing Toyotas also. Ludicrous!
 
Just looked at your profile briefly and noted that you're "100% straight." If that is true, have you actually seen and held (much less measured and had sex with) even one erect penis other than yours up close? What makes you qualified to assess dick sizes not only from visuals alone but also through the lens of a camera? Because I have been using pics and videos sent to me by guys to compare with their actual ones in person and actually measuring them for like a decade now, I've developed a skill of being able to guesstimate what the ballpark numbers would be from visuals of photos and videos alone that I have found quite accurate. The most common lengths are from 5 to 8. Above 8 is unusual and above 9 is rare. Obviously anything over 10 is probably in the 98/99 percentile so I am never more sure when it's a 9, 10 and above or anything below 6. I guess the ranges I find hardest to be really sure just basing on photos would be between 6.5 and 7.5 and between 7.5 and 8.5. I just know for sure Stroke's cock is at the very least a 9 or 10 based on the pics I posted. That is the reasoning for my level of confidence. And because we're all just using the same visuals, anything that contradicts my own estimate, especially when it's ridiculous as a difference of 4 INCHES (for those insisting that it's just around 6.5 or 7), I of course could not possibly take seriously since i have come to trust my own skill not due to personal bias but from the experience of being right all the time after years of practice. So to say that this is only because i "worship" them, as if big cocks were the only thing I required is beyond idiotic. Lol. It's like saying auto mechanics who can diagnose most car problems from the sound of alone after years of experience are only doing it because they worship BMWs, nevermind that they're diagnosing and fixing Toyotas also. Ludicrous!
Someone can be 100% straight and still be able to assess the size of someone of the same sex's anatomy. So I take it you have certificates and awards since you seem to be "qualified". You have confidence in your judgment and I'm glad that you do even though it's rather delusional. I personally have him at 7.3 and be assured, that is far from average or what you may believe to be just above average. Just because something may feel like one thing doesn't mean it is. But you can feel free to hit up CalcSD when you have the time. You'll love it.
 
As if you have any logical reasoning to begin with? I hate to break it to you but "holding pornstar dicks in my hands" isn't going to get you necessarily far in an argument. You clearly do hold these people up on some sort of pedestal.

Well, you clearly didn't read, or more likely, didn't understand everything I have explained in what must now be thousands of words!!

Tell me, do you people understand the concept of mutual exclusivity in logic? You people keep bringing up points that you "think" matter hut are actually not only completely irrelevant but also do not even marginally help you prove that you at least can make a minor point! So even if I do put Stroke's cock as an exemplar that I worship the silicone dildoe model of on my altar, DOES IT HAVE ANY BEARING ON ITS REAL MEASUREMENT THAT IS CLEARLY EVIDENT FROM ALL MY EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS?! NO. They are not mutually exclusive. It may be true that i worship Stroke's cock specifically (because I don't care for Danny's supposedly bigger one, because I apparently "worship" all of them, that's your "logic") but it's also true that he has a 10-incher that you haven't even done anything to refute. My assessment has absolutely nothing to do with your imagined "pedestal" that I have for them. I would have had the same position for Danny's cock no matter how I find him unattractive and unworthy of my worship.

This is all just about their dick sizes. Stop changing the topic. Explain how in the hell that screenshot of Stroke's cock could possibly be around the same size as the smallest dicks in my photos. Your envy is the one that's clearly affecting what should be an easy assessment that doesn't need dick expertise just as my non-worship of fugly Danny's dick is not preventing me to extend the same arguments for him as well. I love dick but they don't have to be huge for me, so that destroys whatever little point you thought you had lol. On the other hand, your dick envy is preventing you from correctly acknowledging the size of dicks that might worsen your envy. So you actually ironically made the argument against yourself because its reverse applies to you more and you unwittingly proved that it's nonsensical when used against me because it's not mutually exclusive with the issue and is actually not even applicable due to the fact that the same point stands for even dicks and porn stars I don't care for. Ha!
 
Someone can be 100% straight and still be able to assess the size of someone of the same sex's anatomy. So I take it you have certificates and awards since you seem to be "qualified". You have confidence in your judgment and I'm glad that you do even though it's rather delusional. I personally have him at 7.3 and be assured, that is far from average or what you may believe to be just above average. Just because something may feel like one thing doesn't mean it is. But you can feel free to hit up CalcSD when you have the time. You'll love it.
You are wasting your time arguing with this guy. He's obviously a troll. If you notice every time he posts he adds more imaginary bs to his stories
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solarpulse4
You are wasting your time arguing with this guy. He's obviously a troll. If you notice every time he posts he adds more imaginary bs to his stories
You're right. I'm genuinely wondering if this person is okay. I'm concerned. All of the evidence I need is on the first page on this thread so I won't bother.
 
Someone can be 100% straight and still be able to assess the size of someone of the same sex's anatomy. So I take it you have certificates and awards since you seem to be "qualified". You have confidence in your judgment and I'm glad that you do even though it's rather delusional. I personally have him at 7.3 and be assured, that is far from average or what you may believe to be just above average. Just because something may feel like one thing doesn't mean it is. But you can feel free to hit up CalcSD when you have the time. You'll love it.

Really now. But that wasn't the question. It's not that you're "straight," it's that you failed to prove that you have even measured dicks and made comparisons with their photos for years. This isn't rocket science that needs a PhD, dingo. It's just a simple matter of experience with a simple skill. If you have improved a skill 100% over time, like, say cooking a pasta dish, you just KNOW that you will nail it with your eyes closed every time. Instead of whining about your inadequacies and digging your own hole, why don't you prove these dicks below are all about the same length?

Do you even know what "delusional" means? If by experience I know that I can only deepthroat 7.5 inches at the most, that's not delusional. That's just my gag reflex telling me. Lol. I don't pretend to be able to guess women's breast cup sizes accurately, for example, because that would make me delusional. Or fight someone who has had experience measuring them and guessing them correctly for years and then insist a picture of one showing an E cup size is just a C. THAT would be truly delusional. Be careful with all these things you love throwing around with abandon because they might just come back to haunt you. Lol. Are you Trump?20201130_041558.jpg
20190318_112931.jpg
20160915_203911_LLS.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eric46546
OP
You are wasting your time arguing with this guy. He's obviously a troll. If you notice every time he posts he adds more imaginary bs to his stories

What "imaginary BS?" You people really believe a dick that's clearly humongous is just above average just because you saw a post about it? And that made you feel better about your lot? Lmao!! And I'm the one with the BS?! Well, I shouldn't be surprised when my country just had 73 million people like you just voted for a professional liar and then proceeded to believe they were cheated. Have fun with your delusions!!!

P. S. If you think my stories about hooking up with porn stars is "BS," come to Vegas and I'll show you all the receipts. Lol. I never delete emails and text messages. And some other evidence. Lol
 
You're right. I'm genuinely wondering if this person is okay. I'm concerned. All of the evidence I need is on the first page on this thread so I won't bother.

Aaw, another one bites the dust. Lol. Who you trying to convince, yourself or yourself? Whatever helps you sleep at night with your penis obsessions and delusions, oh "100% straight" one!! Lol
 
It's an arbitrary "rule" that doesn't take into account the differences and uniqueness in our anatomies and so this makes it unscientific.
No need to read any further than that. You obviously have no fucking clue what you are talking about. No matter in which way you measure, the size of your penis will be the same. Only the number will change. Scientific standards are needed to be able to compare sizes. So if scientific studies use a specific methodology it simply makes no sense using a different one if you want to talk about meaningful numbers. If the average dick is 5.5" bp and you got a 5.5" bp you're still average even if you measure 7" from the side or whatever.
 
No need to read any further than that. You obviously have no fucking clue what you are talking about. No matter in which way you measure, the size of your penis will be the same. Only the number will change. Scientific standards are needed to be able to compare sizes. So if scientific studies use a specific methodology it simply makes no sense using a different one if you want to talk about meaningful numbers. If the average dick is 5.5" bp and you got a 5.5" bp you're still average even if you measure 7" from the side or whatever.

Lmao!!! Aaw...obviously did not understand whatsoever whatever has been written anywhere and now has the fucking nerve to even "think" it can lecture me when I already expounded on standards, arbitrariness, contigencies, considerations and so much more about the subject of measuring dick. Why don't you just try to read and fucking TRY TO UNDERSTAND everything that has been written first before you butt in and just further embarrass your useless self? Read on the anatomy of the male reproductive system before you start spouting on BASIQUE stuff you "think" you know so well but actually just demonstrated you know diddly squat about. Dude, you can't even tell the difference between 6.5 inches and a cock that is clearly closer to the end of a ruler than it is to its middle point from simple observation and comparative analysis/estimate of its dimensions relative to its surroundings alone!!! You're mentally deficient. Lmao!!! It's like the scaling that cartographers do to create maps but on a much more basic level. I even explained it in simple terms elsewhere. Oh nevermind! Again, it's not rocket science. You're just fucking upset about yours but whatever you believe, it's not gonna help you.
 
Ahh now I understand.
It seems dr. feeling good is an experienced professional expert scholar tutor skilled in the field of dick measuring just by seeing and guessing. No need to measure with a ruler anymore just submit a pic of your dick to add to his vast "collection" and he shall correctly guess your size with an added bonus of 2 extra inches
 
Ahh now I understand.
It seems dr. feeling good is an experienced professional expert scholar tutor skilled in the field of dick measuring just by seeing and guessing. No need to measure with a ruler anymore just submit a pic of your dick to add to his vast "collection" and he shall correctly guess your size with an added bonus of 2 extra inches

Instead of writing some lame and cliché "jokes" and trying to make yourself laugh, why don't you just do what I've been suggesting you losers do for the Nth time now to "solve" your non-problem? I know, you don't really want to get to the truth because as far as y'all are concerned, you already got the answer you wanted and preferred from the first page and don't want to hear anything else that refutes it. This is like the most pathetic micro-religion founded in a tiny section of the web. Lol.

If you truly are already settled and 100% confident with your beliefs, why do you keep coming back here then to reaffirm it and tamp down pathetically on any dissenter? It's like you know deep down what the real deal is. It's 6.5 inches or 7 or whatever you believe it is and just move the fuck on! If everything I've presented including pictures are bullshit, why you so pressed and trying hard to write what passes for grade school taunting without actually addressing my main points? Lol. I wonder how old all you people are. Truly hilarious.