Video Cumshot scoring system

[ccoowt]

Re Donnie Dean !c=5D
I am proposing a similar scoring system but hopefully to be included in the major porn info on all male pornstars: IAFD, PornBaseCentral, BoyFriendTV, etc. I'll be writing more over time. Ever since the "money shot" of the 1970's, it has been implicit in all porn (str8, gay, bi), but never officially recognized, stated or discussed. For starters, just two statistics (how many shots? and how far?).
01:05 Total time
00:25 !c=0D = 5 shots including one big spray up to his nipples
I'd call him a "squirter"

Re Timmy# (ChaosMen) !c=6F
01:23 Total time
00:14 !c=6F great squirts to upper chest
I'd call him a "sprayer"

Re Cole Streets (MEN.com) !c=I8
01:30 Total time
01:12 !c=I8 = 8 shots including 2 major spurts up mid back (approx. 12 inches) at furthest point

Re: Bryan Cavallo (College Dudes) !c=9E
01:32 Total time
00:49 !c=9E 7 spurts up chest followed by 2 droplets - Total 9

Re: Marc#(Corbin Fisher) !c=10F
00:51 Total time
00:17 !c=10F Great shots splattering up chest to his neck
I would call him a "sprayer".

Re: JJ Knight (Falcon) !c=16F
01:35 Total time
00:33 !c=16F cumshots with droplets following some great sprays up to his lower chest
I would call him a "sprayer".

Re: Cameron#(SeanCody) !c=12F
02:25 Total time
00:07 !c=12F 12 splendid shots up chest to his neck

Re: Daniel#(SeanCody) !c=8F
02:25 Total time
00:44 !c=8F 8 shots, including 5 great spurts up to Cameron's neck

Re: Lorenzo#(ChaosMen)
02:57 Total time
00:52 !c=15E = 13 great shots to the face!, blocked by Noah's face, but estimated to be at least 5"

Re: Antonio Biaggi [Interesting to discover his REAL NAME is Joan/John Melecio]
02:13 Total time
00:01 Jacking off on driver's seat of car <BiaggiVideos.com>
01:25 !c=8C 8 plops just below his navel spread all around abs

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The Paul Wadsworth CUM TYPOLOGY
Two stats initially. The NUMBER of cumshots (oozes, dribbles, squirts, etc.)
PHENOMENA: 14 categories based upon STRENGTH or STATUS:
A) 0" oozes out of or down the penis => oozer
B) 1/2" just a bit beyond the head => dribbler
C) 1" area between penis and navel => dabbler
D) 2" just over the navel => squirter
E) 3-5" beyond the navel up to the tits => shooter
F) 6-8" from upper chest to neck => sprayer
G) 9" onto mouth or lower face => splatterer
H) 10" into eyes or up to forehead => volcanic (lava burns!)
I) 12" beyond the head => blaster
J) 2ft way beyond the head => distancer
K) 5ft hits the wall behind the bed => waller
L) 10ft across the room => roomie
M) 12ft up to the ceiling => roofer
N) 17ft world record? => world record!
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Would be difficult to include cum stats as official porn info because some models have very variable performances, from like 3A to 10F and how do you measure the distance if the cum hits an obstacle? Like into someone’s mouth?

 

[ccoowt]

Adam Wirthmore in NextDoor Twink - The Hat Trick, with Julian Smiles

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★⯪
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★⯪
3. Consistency ★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 42 stars (B)

 

[riboi0818]

This is my new fixation thread - obsessed with this rubric!

Self Facial by LiamDouglass 22:

https://x.com/LiamDouglass22/status/1959051071608811592

EJACULATION PRESENTATION
Volume ★★★★★
Expulsion Force ★★★★★ (can I give extra credit here?!)
Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL
Genital Presentation ★★★★
Overall Appearance ★★★
Performance Quality ★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY
Editing Flow ★★★★
Scene Capture ★★★★★
Technical Quality ★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT
Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 44 stars

 

[ccoowt]

Jimmy Coxxx (or Jimmy Clay) in Cocksure Men - Jimmy's First Time - Brady Fucks Jimmy, with Brady Jensen

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★⯪
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★⯪

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★

Total score: 45 stars (A)

 

[ccoowt]

Rafael Mieto (or Mieto Duarte) in Irmãos Dotados - Amador - Rafael Mieto, Felipe Dias

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★⯪
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★⯪

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 42 stars (B)

 

[deleted37163561]

Cumshot Evaluation Scoring System
By a devoted enthusiast of studio gay porn

I am obsessed with cumshots. Semen, to me, is the essence of a man's virility — and ejaculation is the visual peak of the orgasmic climax. In every porn video, the cumshot is the moment I anticipate most. A well-crafted scene can be ruined by a chaotic or underwhelming ejaculation, no matter how strong the buildup.
To bring structure to my viewing experience, I’ve devised a scoring system that critically evaluates the ejaculation sequence in studio-produced gay porn videos. Homemade clips and cam shows are excluded due to their inconsistent quality and lack of production standards.

Scoring Categories​

Each scene is rated across four main categories:
Ejaculation Presentation, Performer Appeal, Production Quality, and Memorable Component.
Each subcategory is scored from 1 to 5 stars. A perfect score totals 50 stars.

EJACULATION PRESENTATION​

1. Volume

• 5 stars: Six or more distinct spurts, with semen visibly coating a broad surface (e.g., chest, face, or floor).
• Lower scores reflect fewer spurts or minimal coverage.

2. Expulsion Force

• 5 stars: The cum shoots out with strong, satisfying power, forming a consistent, clear arc that travels at least 50 cm from the tip to its landing point. The trajectory should be smooth and uninterrupted — not sputtering or erratic.
• Lower scores reflect weak dribbles, broken spurts, or short-range ejaculation with no visible arc.

3. Consistency

• 5 stars: Creamy and smooth texture — not too thin or thick. Free of clumps, excessive runniness, or gelatinous appearance.
• Lower scores reflect undesirable textures.

PERFORMER APPEAL​

4. Genital Presentation

• 5 stars: Fully erect, aesthetically pleasing, and proportionally large penis.
• Lower scores reflect partial erections or less visual appeal.

5. Overall Appearance

• 5 stars: Conventionally attractive, physically fit (e.g., muscular build), and confident presence.
• Lower scores reflect poor grooming or lack of charisma.

6. Performance Quality

• 5 stars: Natural moaning, expressive reactions, and visible pleasure. Performer remains emotionally engaged without overacting or appearing disinterested.
• Lower scores reflect exaggerated or flat performances.

PRODUCTION QUALITY​

7. Editing Flow

• 5 stars: The scene allows the performer to nurture his load before ejaculation — through stroking, edging, verbal teasing, or focused attention on the buildup. The pacing should highlight the anticipation and make the climax feel earned. No abrupt cuts or rushed transitions.
• Lower scores reflect choppy editing, premature ejaculation without buildup, or lack of emotional pacing.

8. Scene Capture

• 5 stars: Clear focus on the ejaculation — including the penis, trajectory, landing, and facial expression. Multiple angles preferred. Slow-motion replays discouraged.
• Lower scores reflect poor framing or missed visuals.

9. Technical Quality

• 5 stars: High-definition video, well-balanced lighting, and clean audio. Background music optional but should not overpower natural sounds.
• Lower scores reflect grainy footage, poor lighting, or distracting sound.

MEMORABLE COMPONENT​

10. Memorability

• 5 stars: Reserved for an extraordinary ejaculation, such as:
  • Multiple ejaculations in a row
  • Hands-free climax
  • Semen landing on an unusual object (e.g., mirror, camera lens, clothing item)
• Lower scores reflect standard or forgettable executions.

Final Scoring Summary​

Rate each subcategory from 1 to 5 stars. Add up the total for a score out of 50 stars.

Grade Conversion​

Total Score	Grade
45–50	A
40–44	B
30–39	C
20–29	D
0–19	F

Specimen A: Donnie Dean in TitanMen - Bad Cop, with Ricky Decker

View attachment 184620821
EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 44 stars (B+)

Of course, all of this is purely subjective and just a joke. You are more than welcome to disagree with my scores and give comments!

I love your scoring system… so good!

 

[Nacksendora]

Cumshot Evaluation Scoring System
By a devoted enthusiast of studio gay porn

I am obsessed with cumshots. Semen, to me, is the essence of a man's virility — and ejaculation is the visual peak of the orgasmic climax. In every porn video, the cumshot is the moment I anticipate most. A well-crafted scene can be ruined by a chaotic or underwhelming ejaculation, no matter how strong the buildup.
To bring structure to my viewing experience, I’ve devised a scoring system that critically evaluates the ejaculation sequence in studio-produced gay porn videos. Homemade clips and cam shows are excluded due to their inconsistent quality and lack of production standards.

Scoring Categories​

Each scene is rated across four main categories:
Ejaculation Presentation, Performer Appeal, Production Quality, and Memorable Component.
Each subcategory is scored from 1 to 5 stars. A perfect score totals 50 stars.

EJACULATION PRESENTATION​

1. Volume

• 5 stars: Six or more distinct spurts, with semen visibly coating a broad surface (e.g., chest, face, or floor).
• Lower scores reflect fewer spurts or minimal coverage.

2. Expulsion Force

• 5 stars: The cum shoots out with strong, satisfying power, forming a consistent, clear arc that travels at least 50 cm from the tip to its landing point. The trajectory should be smooth and uninterrupted — not sputtering or erratic.
• Lower scores reflect weak dribbles, broken spurts, or short-range ejaculation with no visible arc.

3. Consistency

• 5 stars: Creamy and smooth texture — not too thin or thick. Free of clumps, excessive runniness, or gelatinous appearance.
• Lower scores reflect undesirable textures.

PERFORMER APPEAL​

4. Genital Presentation

• 5 stars: Fully erect, aesthetically pleasing, and proportionally large penis.
• Lower scores reflect partial erections or less visual appeal.

5. Overall Appearance

• 5 stars: Conventionally attractive, physically fit (e.g., muscular build), and confident presence.
• Lower scores reflect poor grooming or lack of charisma.

6. Performance Quality

• 5 stars: Natural moaning, expressive reactions, and visible pleasure. Performer remains emotionally engaged without overacting or appearing disinterested.
• Lower scores reflect exaggerated or flat performances.

PRODUCTION QUALITY​

7. Editing Flow

• 5 stars: The scene allows the performer to nurture his load before ejaculation — through stroking, edging, verbal teasing, or focused attention on the buildup. The pacing should highlight the anticipation and make the climax feel earned. No abrupt cuts or rushed transitions.
• Lower scores reflect choppy editing, premature ejaculation without buildup, or lack of emotional pacing.

8. Scene Capture

• 5 stars: Clear focus on the ejaculation — including the penis, trajectory, landing, and facial expression. Multiple angles preferred. Slow-motion replays discouraged.
• Lower scores reflect poor framing or missed visuals.

9. Technical Quality

• 5 stars: High-definition video, well-balanced lighting, and clean audio. Background music optional but should not overpower natural sounds.
• Lower scores reflect grainy footage, poor lighting, or distracting sound.

MEMORABLE COMPONENT​

10. Memorability

• 5 stars: Reserved for an extraordinary ejaculation, such as:
  • Multiple ejaculations in a row
  • Hands-free climax
  • Semen landing on an unusual object (e.g., mirror, camera lens, clothing item)
• Lower scores reflect standard or forgettable executions.

Final Scoring Summary​

Rate each subcategory from 1 to 5 stars. Add up the total for a score out of 50 stars.

Grade Conversion​

Total Score	Grade
45–50	A
40–44	B
30–39	C
20–29	D
0–19	F

Specimen A: Donnie Dean in TitanMen - Bad Cop, with Ricky Decker

View attachment 184620821
EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 44 stars (B+)

Of course, all of this is purely subjective and just a joke. You are more than welcome to disagree with my scores and give comments!

You forgot to include Aiming
Some people cant land a single shot even with a bazooka

 

[ccoowt]

You forgot to include Aiming
Some people cant land a single shot even with a bazooka

Aiming is part of expulsion force in this system

 

[ccoowt]

Carter Collins in Cocky Boys - A SECRET PLACE: Carter Collins & Oliver Marks

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★⯪
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★⯪
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 41 stars (B)

 

[ccoowt]

Lucas Knowles in Hard Brit Lads - Lucas Knowles & Hayden Kane

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★⯪
3. Performance Quality ★★★⯪

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 46 stars (A)

 

[ccoowt]

Jeremy Bilding in Men.com - Man Overboard, with Trent Diesel

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★⯪

Total score: 41.5 stars (B)

 

[ccoowt]

ONA Collection - 陳光が筋肉髭上司を犯す！白昼堂々上司と部下の秘密の情事…濃厚なキスを何度も交わすスーツFUCK！(Chinkou fucks his muscle-bearded boss! A secret affair between boss and subordinate in broad daylight... Suit FUCK with repeated deep kisses!)

For 陳光 (Chinkou):

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 41 stars (B)

For 結城悠 (Yuki Yu):

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 41 stars (B)

 

[olivergreat26]

what about this?

 

[ccoowt]

what about this?

I only review studio scenes

 

[Argelius]

I *love* this thread! It might even get me to upgrade to a paid account.

However, I have to agree with a previous poster -- there are too many "perfect" scores. Rather than just rating the award-winning shooters and geysers, other really hot cumshots (that aren't necessarily hot due to volume and distance, should be rated, too.

 

[ccoowt]

I *love* this thread! It might even get me to upgrade to a paid account.

However, I have to agree with a previous poster -- there are too many "perfect" scores. Rather than just rating the award-winning shooters and geysers, other really hot cumshots (that aren't necessarily hot due to volume and distance, should be rated, too.

Thanks for your suggestion

 

[ccoowt]

Alex Rise in Broke Straight Boys - Alex Has Bareback Sex With Bruce Ending In Sticky Facial, with Bruce Garcia

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★⯪
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★⯪
3. Performance Quality ★★★⯪

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★⯪

Total score: 39 stars (C+)

 

[ccoowt]

Cocky Boys - Jake Bass & Lukas Grande Flip-Fuck

For Lukas Grande:

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★⯪
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★⯪
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★⯪
2. Overall Appearance ★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★⯪
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★⯪

Total score: 42.5 stars (B)


For Jake Bass:

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★★
3. Consistency ★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★⯪
3. Performance Quality ★★★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 38.5 stars (C)

 

[ccoowt]

Danny (aka Kevin Falk) in Dirty Tony - Danny Pounds Seth's Ass, with Seth Lyons

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★⯪
3. Consistency ★★★★⯪

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★
3. Performance Quality ★★★

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★⯪
2. Scene Capture ★★★⯪
3. Technical Quality ★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★★

Total score: 37 stars (C)

 

[ccoowt]

Greyson Lane in Guys in Sweatpants - Greyson fucks River, with River Wilks

EJACULATION PRESENTATION

1. Volume ★★★
2. Expulsion Force ★★★★★
3. Consistency ★★★★★

PERFORMER APPEAL

1. Genital Presentation ★★★★
2. Overall Appearance ★★★⯪
3. Performance Quality ★★★⯪

PRODUCTION QUALITY

1. Editing Flow ★★★★★
2. Scene Capture ★★★★
3. Technical Quality ★★★★★

MEMORABLE COMPONENT

1. Memorability ★★★★

Total score: 42 stars (B)