Daniel Radcliffe

I dunno why people find it so hard to follow the rules on this one.

Stop putting the site at risk!!

I've seen the play and it's ironic you can legally see him in the flesh but you can't see pics, but even if the law is dumb we still have to follow it.
 
Well there are certainly other boys from the Harry Potter flicks that I'd rather see naked, but I gotta say that promo pic is kind of hot!
 
Oops sorry - I didn't mean to repost the link when I quoted him - was trying to work out why you edited me.
 
people! he's nearly 18 and it is a serious piece of theatre that has been around a long time. it's not gratuitously sexual and it's important to the piece. it's not as if he's doing porn! and because of this crazy fucked up world we live in it was a very good chance that he would have had no career after HP. the most terryfing thing is not the nude scene it's seeing if people will accept him as a serious actor. in any case people are so quick to judge without even having all the facts or seeing the performance for themselves. mob mentality which seems to be the norm in everything these days.
 
The problem is not with the play Equus. So far, I can't recall anyone on the board discussing the artistic merits of the play. Much of the interest in the play has been purient curiosity about Daniel Radcliffe's anatomy (and semi-pornographic appeal). If people want to discuss the artistic merits of the drama, then do so. Sexualized conversations about Radcliffe, a minor, however, only put this site at risk of being shut down by the authorities. Again, Kotchanski has been very clear and fair-minded about this.

people! he's nearly 18 and it is a serious piece of theatre that has been around a long time. it's not gratuitously sexual and it's important to the piece. it's not as if he's doing porn! and because of this crazy fucked up world we live in it was a very good chance that he would have had no career after HP. the most terryfing thing is not the nude scene it's seeing if people will accept him as a serious actor. in any case people are so quick to judge without even having all the facts or seeing the performance for themselves. mob mentality which seems to be the norm in everything these days.
 
I saw the play on the Saturday matinee 24th Feb. He was damn good in the role and generally a good all round cast with the exception of Agutter who was abysmal.
 
I'm closing this thread.

I will also close all other threads, past or future, started about this actor since they all seem to draw comments of a sexual nature about a minor, particularly in light of his recent role.
 
i just saw a naked shot of him from equus or watever it is he has a nice uncut cock
 
I think it's fake. Everything was pretty guarded because of the Harry Potter franchise and if you look closely it seems slightly out of proportion.
 
Like this was the first Daniel Radcliffe thread or discussion on here....So go pound salt up your ass with a big hammer...OK Princess Hysteria.....?