Did he measure wrong?

[dkn0681]

A friend of mine agreed to compare sizes, if only by e-mail. He says he measured his length to be 7" and his circumference/girth to be 3".

As impressed as I am by the length, the girth seems impossibly thin. Is a 3" girth even possible? Or do we think he measured wrong?

(On the off chance he didn't make a mistake I don't want to respond with "Dude, it can't possibly be that thin!")

 

[Chrysalis]

A friend of mine agreed to compare sizes, if only by e-mail. He says he measured his length to be 7" and his circumference/girth to be 3".

As impressed as I am by the length, the girth seems impossibly thin. Is a 3" girth even possible? Or do we think he measured wrong?

(On the off chance he didn't make a mistake I don't want to respond with "Dude, it can't possibly be that thin!")

I'm thinking maybe he just measured across and didn't wrap a tape measure around it...

Doesn't understand that girth means circumference, not diameter...

 

[Adam Bleytou]

I'm thinking maybe he just measured across and didn't wrap a tape measure around it...

Doesn't understand that girth means circumference, not diameter...

I agree.

 

[dkn0681]

I'm thinking maybe he just measured across and didn't wrap a tape measure around it...

That doesn't seem right either -- 3" ACROSS would be huge, no?

 

[Adam Bleytou]

That doesn't seem right either -- 3" ACROSS would be huge, no?

Unless he added an inch to impress you. :wink:

 

[rob_just_rob]

3" girth is narrow, but not improbably so.

3" width is less likely, I would imagine.

 

[B_dxjnorto]

We ought have a contest for longest and skinniest. How skinny around do dicks get? Either three inches girth or three inches width seem improbable.

 

[Donk]

Here's what you do. Respond with your girth--do not comment on his, and be sure and label yours "girth". If he responds with something like "Dude, you can't be that wide," that will be a clue that he measured wrong. You can then explain that yours is the measurement around and ask him how he measured is.

Sounds like maybe he thought girth meant across, but he either exaggerated or included the measurement around the sides (i.e., what he really gave you was half of his girth).

If he is really only 3" around, then he may be already be aware that this is freakishly thin.

 

[dkn0681]

This is interesting. The thinnest I've seen was maybe 4" aound or more.

 

[Chrysalis]

The toy in this picture is 3.25" in circumference and 7.5" long.

So I suppose it's not inconceivable...

But I've never encountered a real penis of these dimensions.

 

[dreamer20]

He says he measured his length to be 7" and his circumference/girth to be 3".

Do we think he measured wrong?

His diameter would be nearly an inch for that girth. He should state if this is an erect or flaccid measurement and then measure once more.

I am reminded of this thread:

http://www.lpsg.org/sex-with-a-large-penis/38668-new-lpsg-requirement-go-look.html

 

[OKFarmer]

3 inches across does sound improbable but who knows. Maybe it is wide yet not deep? The problem with circumference measures is that a penis is not a cylinder in many cases. 3 inches around may be right but who knows.

 

[68306]

Maybe 7 and 3 are his lucky numbers?

 

[dkn0681]

I may have to examine it in person to be sure...

 

[CardiffDillon]

My thumb is more than 3 inches around, sounds like he got it wrong. I'd demand a recount!

cheers

Dillon

 

[basque9]

That doesn't seem right either -- 3" ACROSS would be huge, no?

Actually a 3 inch diameter equals approx. 9.4 in girth. This is a WOW size, but I have seen two 9 inch girth in my time : one on a 7 inch long cock and the other on a 9.75 inch long cock. If I had to choose, I would choose to be 3 inches in diameter rather than 3 inches in girth!:smile:

 

[joe_smith]

3" girth is definately possible I has a buddy of mine that has 2" girth flaccid and about 3" hard. His legnth is on the average sive at 5.5 ish.

 

[contortionist]

I agree with donkey. 3'' wide is huge so my conclusion is - unless you send images of each other, you're probably both spinning yarns

 

[BigA]

I'm thinking maybe he just measured across and didn't wrap a tape measure around it...

Doesn't understand that girth means circumference, not diameter...

whoa. that would be a monster! damn. i know we're used to big dicks here. But 3" girth is more than possible. I agree it does seem unusual to be 7x3. If it's that important to know his size, write him back, in a coy manner explaining girth clearly. If he changes it, then you know

 

[D_nhfgtyf]

well he might be true check these clips out... Liz Vicious this guy has a very small and thin one...