Do Straight Men Let Another Man Give Them Blowjobs?

[bwhip1011]

Color me "not surprised" you've been banned.

Couldn't care less about this topic any longer, it's way too exhausting. But raise the flag regarding the above! :arms:

If you'd like to know why then please see my comments from this morning in http://www.lpsg.com/415761-milton-berle-bulge.html

I guess I can take this tool out of my Ignore List. Thank you moderators! :wink:

 

[bloodshot69]

Class is in session. Let me clear this up for you gents:

If you have a dick and you suck a dick,... You're gay or bisexual.

If you have a dick and let someone put their dick in your ass,.... you are gay or bisexual.

If you have a dick and get your dick sucked by someone who has a dick,.. You're gay or bisexual.

If you have a dick and put your dick in someones ass who has a dick,.....You're gay or bisexual.

If you have a dick and you only want vagina,......you're Straight

If you have a dick and you only want to put your dick in a Woman's ass,... You're straight.

If you're a man and don't find women attractive and only want sex from other men,.. You are gay.

If you claim to be gay and have sex with a woman, You're Bi

Any REAL Straight Man will not have sex with another guy in any form. If they say they're straight and have sexual relations with the same sex, they're full of shit.

Any REAL GAY man will not have sex with a woman, If they say they are gay and have sexual relations with the opposite sex, They're full of shit. They're Bi.

Gay men: leave the strait guys alone, they do not want to have sex with you no matter how bad you want them to. Lay this shit to rest.

For the record I'm Bisexual. I find the straight line too restrictive. But I like girls more than guys. I'm Attracted to men and if the chemistry is right, will indulge in some sexual shenanigans with them only safe stuff. I like the best of both worlds and won't apologize for it. I'm not married either. Cheating is Cheating no matter what sex you're doing it with.

I deal with both guys and girls so I feel I know what I'm talking about.

Couldn't be said any better...

 

[deleted15807]

The sheep and goat gang here is hilarious. One massive circle jerk. Notice how they have zero scientific proof to back their assertions except each other and a selective take on the vast data present in dictionary.

Meanwhile the Kinsey Institute, the pioneer's in sex research:

“Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats…The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects."

“It is a characteristic of the human mind that tries to dichotomize in its classification of phenomena….Sexual behavior is either normal or abnormal, socially acceptable or unacceptable, heterosexual or homosexual; and many persons do not want to believe that there are gradations in these matters from one to the other extreme.”

The Kinsey Institute - Kinsey Sexuality Rating Scale​

 

[MJ_27]

137 pages later and this thread STILL going?!? Lol geez ..

 

[Hatt_101]

if human sexuality is constantly evolving how can you use a scale that was published in 1948 67 years ago as the end all be all of all measurement?

And in case you didnt notice there is a 0 and a 6 where many people fall in 0 being straight and 6 being Gay/lesbian and X referring to asexual. anything between 1-5 can in some form can be considered bisexual because in cause you didnt look at the scale the word bi sexual isnt on it.

And the question as written in the very first post is asking it of men who are a 0 on the scale to which the answer again, which was answered many times on the very first page, is No.

if you want to use science as your backbone you should know that in science almost all things are just theory. nothing is in cement proven. Even things we know as basically as gravity, something we all understand, is just theory.

Now there is a whole heap of a lot more research done on gravity than there was done on the Kinsey scale and it is still only a theory but if you want to use a 67 year old scale as law fine but even according to the scale 0's still would only be with the opposite sex and 6's still would only be with the same sex.

 

[Smaccoms]

So basically this is a room for niggers like Hatt 101 who are shamed to be a nigger and run to white trash white men don't want. A bunch of faggot ass white guys who love to suck other guys dicks and get fucked in the ass thinking that makes them straight? I see why the world hates niggers and even more people hate white people.

The only good nigger was one picking cotton and the only good white is one who was never born.

Racist & homophobic...gut wrenchingly so. Gamergate, is that you? GTFO!

if human sexuality is constantly evolving how can you use a scale that was published in 1948 67 years ago as the end all be all of all measurement?

And in case you didnt notice there is a 0 and a 6 where many people fall in 0 being straight and 6 being Gay/lesbian and X referring to asexual. anything between 1-5 can in some form can be considered bisexual because in cause you didnt look at the scale the word bi sexual isnt on it.

And the question as written in the very first post is asking it of men who are a 0 on the scale to which the answer again, which was answered many times on the very first page, is No.

if you want to use science as your backbone you should know that in science almost all things are just theory. nothing is in cement proven. Even things we know as basically as gravity, something we all understand, is just theory.

Now there is a whole heap of a lot more research done on gravity than there was done on the Kinsey scale and it is still only a theory but if you want to use a 67 year old scale as law fine but even according to the scale 0's still would only be with the opposite sex and 6's still would only be with the same sex.

This is the most I remember seeing you engage here in a long time. Congratulations.

However, there is a fair amount of fear and insecurity seeping through your response. It's obviously you only wish to see why/how any alternative theory of sexuality is false. You seem to need your personal conception of sexuality to be true.

So I have questions for you. Why do you need the sexual binary to be true? Is it somehow helping you subsist? Can you even entertain the general idea that your personal conception could be incorrect?

 

[Hatt_101]

i never said it is binary i even used the scale that was provided to say that there are people that are not interested in same sex relations because some people here believe that it is impossible which just is not true. i don't know where you a seeing fear and insecurity because it is not present.

just like how there are people here that don't believe bisexuality exist, but with that the majority of people see the flaws in it seeing as there are a lot of bisexual people here

Racist & homophobic...gut wrenchingly so. Gamergate, is that you? GTFO!



This is the most I remember seeing you engage here in a long time. Congratulations.

However, there is a fair amount of fear and insecurity seeping through your response. It's obviously you only wish to see why/how any alternative theory of sexuality is false. You seem to need your personal conception of sexuality to be true.

So I have questions for you. Why do you need the sexual binary to be true? Is it somehow helping you subsist? Can you even entertain the general idea that your personal conception could be incorrect?

 

[dns70]

no.

 

[jujube]

I would say that some psychologically bisexual men who are living straight lifestyles may let other men give them blowjobs. However, if those men are married or in committed relationships with women, it should be considered as cheating unless their wives/girlfriends know about the situation and are OK with it for whatever reason.

 

[AlexDB9]

I'd had heterosexual sex about 2000 times (and loved it) before I had any sexual contact with a man. The first time I got a blowjob, the stubble against my thighs, the powerful action of his jaw and throat, a man's hand working my shaft--nothing like a woman doing it. No "a mouth is a mouth." I didn't feel straight AT ALL while the dude had my cock in his throat. I was very much aware that I was participating in homosexual sex. Nothing straight about it. I had been living with a woman for 2 years but I never felt 100% straight after that first blow. After a second time I knew I was bi.

 

[deleted15807]

However, there is a fair amount of fear and insecurity seeping through your response. It's obviously you only wish to see why/how any alternative theory of sexuality is false. You seem to need your personal conception of sexuality to be true.

And an unsubstantiated theory backed by no one but themselves and others on an internet chat board rather than sexuality experts. What do those "experts" now about sexuality anyway vs. "common sense".

 

[girthyhead]

The willingness, and especially determination, to put labels on people is what I find disheartening about this thread.

 

[deleted15807]

The willingness, and especially determination, to put labels on people is what I find disheartening about this thread.

Certain brains of certain humans cannot handle ambiguity. They want/need to label and classify. While others object to someone in 'my pool' that they feel are unqualified to be there and hence must be tossed out. It's much like the social need to classify people by race even if science like sexuality has no exact way to do that. People just "make up the rules" of who is who and what is what regardless of the individual's wishes and beliefs just like race and to a lesser extent class.

 

[Hatt_101]

And an unsubstantiated theory backed by no one but themselves and others on an internet chat board rather than sexuality experts. What do those "experts" now about sexuality anyway vs. "common sense".

even using the scale you brought up there still exists the group, The 0's and 6's, of people that are not interested in certain things so it would seem that you are the one that is against these so called experts. you keep bringing up the scale but you dont seem to understand it.

 

[Snakebyte]

Certain brains of certain humans cannot handle ambiguity. They want/need to label and classify. While others object to someone in 'my pool' that they feel are unqualified to be there and hence must be tossed out. It's much like the social need to classify people by race even if science like sexuality has no exact way to do that. People just "make up the rules" of who is who and what is what regardless of the individual's wishes and beliefs just like race and to a lesser extent class.

Thing is labels in general are not a bad thing. As a matter of fact you need them to survive (ok maybe less nowadays). It's just about where you draw the line.
On the other hand what's the problem with labels as long as there is no negative connotation? I don't think the problem is that labels for sexual preference exist. The problem is that people think that any label is better than the others.
If you get rid of labels it won't change the fact that some people are black and others are white. Won't change the fact that some people only have sex with the same biological sex and others don't. Won't change the fact that some people are motherucking stupid and others are not.

We don't need to get rid of labels at all. People just need to learn that white isn't better than black (or the other way around), straight isn't better than bi, gay isn't better than straight.

 

[Hatt_101]

+1

Thing is labels in general are not a bad thing. As a matter of fact you need them to survive (ok maybe less nowadays). It's just about where you draw the line.
On the other hand what's the problem with labels as long as there is no negative connotation? I don't think the problem is that labels for sexual preference exist. The problem is that people think that any label is better than the others.
If you get rid of labels it won't change the fact that some people are black and others are white. Won't change the fact that some people only have sex with the same biological sex and others don't. Won't change the fact that some people are motherucking stupid and others are not.

We don't need to get rid of labels at all. People just need to learn that white isn't better than black (or the other way around), straight isn't better than bi, gay isn't better than straight.

 

[deleted15807]

Thing is labels in general are not a bad thing. As a matter of fact you need them to survive (ok maybe less nowadays). It's just about where you draw the line.
On the other hand what's the problem with labels as long as there is no negative connotation? I don't think the problem is that labels for sexual preference exist. The problem is that people think that any label is better than the others.
If you get rid of labels it won't change the fact that some people are black and others are white. Won't change the fact that some people only have sex with the same biological sex and others don't. Won't change the fact that some people are motherucking stupid and others are not.

We don't need to get rid of labels at all. People just need to learn that white isn't better than black (or the other way around), straight isn't better than bi, gay isn't better than straight.

It's a good idea to keep the conversation within a certain context. Saying we need labels to survive while discussing sexuality is rather nonsensical and off-topic. We're not talking about recognizing snakes or tigers and sharks as threatening to human life.

Further you then say but things are in fact black and white which in discussing sexuality is rather absurd given all the research on sexuality we know just as attempting to classify people as black or white. And based on what? Some people need black or white because they don't have the intelligence to look at something a different way.

Like race there isn't a single feature that one can assign that makes you white or makes you black or brown. And there isn't a single feature of sexuality that makes you straight, bi or gay. In spite of the proud know nothings in this thread that use a behavior to assign a label.

What you're essentially trying to say is 'accept the label we assign you and be proud of it'. If I am wrong in that assessment please correct me.

even using the scale you brought up there still exists the group, The 0's and 6's, of people that are not interested in certain things so it would seem that you are the one that is against these so called experts. you keep bringing up the scale but you dont seem to understand it.

You don't own the scale and you don't have the right or the knowledge to put someone ANYWHERE on the scale. Yet you do. That's what you don't get. And perhaps I am wrong. Why not provide some research links that say blowjobs equal orientation. You've said many times that it means you're bisexual. I'm willing to alter my view based on the data.

 

[Hatt_101]

im not placing anyone on the scale bases off of the question in the very first post it is being asked on people who are a 0 on the scale. what part of that dont you get? you are the one placing people on a scale im only using what you provided.

 

[deleted15807]

im not placing anyone on the scale bases off of the question in the very first post it is being asked on people who are a 0 on the scale. what part of that dont you get? you are the one placing people on a scale im only using what you provided.

Please post here a post of mine where I assign someone an orientation.

And what is going on here but Hatt_101 assigning orientation based on behavior?

I personally never said anyone was gay if you like both you are bi and if it was a one time thing you are bi curious at the very least but the question in this tread is directed at straight men not a variation of bi and as a straight man I can say I would never let a man blow men because I don't like men. I don't think any one said a guy was gay.if you are primarily with women but you like men a little too then you are bi that's why they have the % on our profile to show how much guys that are bi like women compaired to men

 

[Hatt_101]

the whole premise of using the scale is assigning behavior. the scale itself signs varying levels of hetero or homosexuality to people and you were the one that brought up the scale so if you weren't assigning a level of sexuality why did you bring up the scale in the first place?