KingKairo
Expert Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Posts
- 21
- Media
- 17
- Likes
- 197
- Points
- 63
- Location
- Evansville (Indiana, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
There needs to be a “see all pictures in thread” function
That actually touched my heart . Or gave me a boner . One or the twoLmao he's acting like every little thing he does has a meaning. Wouldn't be surprised if he posted himself jerking off and write a long caption about how jerking off is a spiritual feeling that gets closer to the earth as the the air hugs your body closely as you climax.. lol
that’s a good ideaLmao he's acting like every little thing he does has a meaning. Wouldn't be surprised if he posted himself jerking off and write a long caption about how jerking off is a spiritual feeling that gets closer to the earth as the the air hugs your body closely as you climax.. lol
Dude the photo with the dick is fake...I made it and still have it. I used pics art to do it and the dick is from some dude online I found in Google images. I make fakes all the time (Check out the HRVY thread). I posted it to telegram where someone removed my shit watermark and tried to pass it off as their own here.i am now convinced someone, or a group of someones, is desperately trying to push a narrative that all Dylan photos are fake. if you can't stop the photos from leaking, and you can't get them removed, the next best thing is to cast doubt on there legitimacy.
the dick in this photo looks exactly the same as the other leaked photo, people claimed that photo was fake to, but that photo came from a different source.
so either these people have the full set of uncensored photos and instead of releasing them they are photoshoping the same fake dick over his real dick, OR these photos are real and some shady cats are getting angry that their exclusives are leaking for free or they are just simps for Dylan and will scream "fake" to cast doubt and save face.
I'm only here for the popcorn and tea, but I'm curious. Why would this Red Cube person, if he or she had the originals, deliberately create a fake? That seems weird. And I've done enough (professional) Photoshop work to know that you can't pull that red watermark off the "original fake" without artifacts appearing in the "BMB fake" that follow. But there's no sign of artifacts, although the BMB is slightly fuzzier. But even that loss of precision isn't helpful, given that the red line of text crosses what appears (in the BMB version) to be a fold in the mattress sheet, which no currently available watermark removal tool could re-create from pattern analysis alone.
@nightbat may well be right in his assessment.
You’re talking about a different photo sisThe photo that I used didnt have the red watermark over it just some black digital drawing over Dylan's dick and ass.
I must've missed them, I didn't know. When did this happen?You’re talking about a different photo sis
I must've missed them, I didn't know. When did this happen?
You must not be very good at your (professional) Photoshopping then.I'm only here for the popcorn and tea, but I'm curious. Why would this Red Cube person, if he or she had the originals, deliberately create a fake? That seems weird. And I've done enough (professional) Photoshop work to know that you can't pull that red watermark off the "original fake" without artifacts appearing in the "BMB fake" that follow. But there's no sign of artifacts, although the BMB is slightly fuzzier. But even that loss of precision isn't helpful, given that the red line of text crosses what appears (in the BMB version) to be a fold in the mattress sheet, which no currently available watermark removal tool could re-create from pattern analysis alone.
@nightbat may well be right in his assessment.
I don't know about BMB; I find the overall bait scene to be sufficiently tiring that I don't bother to study the minutiae of who-does-what-to-whom. I do know that I was the photo editor for a newspaper for a while. And I know that current watermark-removal algorithms, interpreted in light of the quoted photo, can't reproduce elements not already present in the watermarked image.You must not be very good at your (professional) Photoshopping then.
People are actually going to believe a proven scammer? How many times does BMB have to be proven to be full of shit?
I agree, there’s just no way they haven’t been leaked yet and I believe the photos we’ve seen are real.i am now convinced someone, or a group of someones, is desperately trying to push a narrative that all Dylan photos are fake. if you can't stop the photos from leaking, and you can't get them removed, the next best thing is to cast doubt on there legitimacy.
the dick in this photo looks exactly the same as the other leaked photo, people claimed that photo was fake to, but that photo came from a different source.
so either these people have the full set of uncensored photos and instead of releasing them they are photoshoping the same fake dick over his real dick, OR these photos are real and some shady cats are getting angry that their exclusives are leaking for free or they are just simps for Dylan and will scream "fake" to cast doubt and save face.
I agree, there’s just no way they haven’t been leaked yet and I believe the photos we’ve seen are real.
I'm only here for the popcorn and tea, but I'm curious. Why would this Red Cube person, if he or she had the originals, deliberately create a fake? That seems weird. And I've done enough (professional) Photoshop work to know that you can't pull that red watermark off the "original fake" without artifacts appearing in the "BMB fake" that follow. But there's no sign of artifacts, although the BMB is slightly fuzzier. But even that loss of precision isn't helpful, given that the red line of text crosses what appears (in the BMB version) to be a fold in the mattress sheet, which no currently available watermark removal tool could re-create from pattern analysis alone.
@nightbat may well be right in his assessment.
That photo is really Dylan. Nothing looks fake about it at all.Hmmmm...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.