Yes good point I have also seen that he doesn't post much and therefore didn't subscribe. Besides he has said before that he was only going to post "art" and not actual porn. Also from his page without subscribing he clearly states he has had some personal stuff happen and apologizes for not posting and thanks his supporters. He's not trying to deceive anyone. Love or hate the guy he's not a scammer.
- Status
Sharkvelvet1
Superior Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2019
- Posts
- 2,654
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 6,197
- Points
- 208
- Location
- Miami (Florida, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
Nah.
He's said he was returning to start updating his OF months ago now, I believe?
He didn't necessarily give a timeline of when the posts would start coming, but you can bet your ass his number of subscriptions went up right after he made that announcement. If he hadn't posted anything new that month after that announcement when you have a "monthly" subscription, it's fair to feel scammed.
You're slipping, you didn't claim that megadixxx was trying to "get laid" by him.
It's not gaslighting or white knighting if you won't get on board the haterade train with you. Some of us see things honestly and don't have the sense of entitlement some of you have.
Dylan has NEVER posted very much and what he's been posting now is beyond slow, even by his minimal posting standards. And since he's "started" again a couple of times and failed to live up, if you saw him say he's going to start posting "soon" and you ran right out and plunked down $15 for his OF ... then it's your own damn fault. I wouldn't sign up until I saw several weeks of frequent posting. I wouldn't sign up at $15 anyways.
I bet you're the type that that buys from late night infomercials and winds up disappointed again and again.
ILoveManNipples
Worshipped Member
He posted that one photo weeks ago so they don’t make his page inactive. He can post once every few months before it’s deemed inactive
So expecting him to actually do what he said he was going to do is being dishonest and entitled?
I do like that in your own attempted defence of him, you admit he's a liar and a bullshitter who doesn't deliver on his promises.
I'm not trying to defend him, he is what he is. When someone shows you who they are, believe them. He has shown us, more than once in the past that he won't keep his promises, there will always be some excuse.
But you enablers that expect different results, this time, are just laughable at this point. The definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over again ... and expecting different results.
I mean, people can always go and hit unsubscribe if they're not getting what they expected. I've also been there before, I like a performer a lot so I stick with the subscription even though they don't post. Later on I unfollow or if they rarely post, I then subscribe 3 times a year just to catch up.
Either way, people is the one still paying on monthly basis.
Either way, people is the one still paying on monthly basis.
I believe OF only suspends new subscriptions, when the performer hasn't logged in for 30 days. It doesn't matter if they post nothing, they just have to log in to keep it running.
No, sure, you're not defending him, you're just blaming other people for his behaviour and absolving him of any blame, because other people (oh, sorry, "haters") should just know what he's like. That's totally not defending him, right.
I mean the money really isn’t much to me, it’s the dishonesty which is.
You’re right, he did post back in February with the caption “going to start posting more” or something along the lines of that. That is called lying in case you weren’t aware, because he didn’t post fuck all for the entire month.
You can’t blame people for believing something that someone says they’re going to do. You expect them to give a shit about their “product” and actually deliver on the things they say. Call the people dumb who know about Dylan’s antics, but don’t pretend like he isn’t scamming people who don’t know anything about his past behaviour.
Sometime, you finally need to take responsibility for the fact that you're being played, again and again.
Knowing his past behavior and antics meant I never gave a thought to joining his OF again as I didn't believe him. I also don't spend money on an OF if I know nothing about the person. First a little research via here or just a google search..it isn't that difficult to know what you are getting into. Someone should at leat know what is possible on OF and what can go wrong. I know any time I join an OF it might go bad, but that is a risk I choose to take and I don't come here to scream about being scammed. If I feel someone's OF is badly run I will post about it here as I would have if someone asked if Dylan's OF was worth joining. I guess I am more cynical and less trusting than most who come here.
Again, you’re over exaggerating my post. I’m not “screaming”, just pointing out that he’s scamming people who don’t want to read 300 pages on LPSG about him, or who even know this thread is here.
When you buy something on a platform with a reputation like onlyfans you expect the offer to be somewhat legitimate. He straight up lied in early Feb. Expecting people to do their due diligence about someone they want to jerk off to is quite hilarious. Anyways I’m fine with wasting my money, Dylan’s just building an even worse relationship with people who actually want to do business with him.
Caleb Trask
Worshipped Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2019
- Posts
- 8,163
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 20,993
- Points
- 183
- Location
- NYC (New York, United States)
- Sexuality
- 90% Gay, 10% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Christ, can OF just post “Caveat Emptor” on their website, which has literally been around for thousands of years, so people stop complaining obsessively about their charges and purchases? Most people wouldn’t buy a small appliance without doing research, are they so blinded by lust they loose their minds, pull out their credit cards and sign up for a year of this shit. Dudes, get a hold of your dicks, you control them, not the other way around.
I’m sorry, I’m just so exhausted by this perpetual argument everywhere and need to vent. Some people need to have their credit cards withheld from them, for their own protection.
I’m sorry, I’m just so exhausted by this perpetual argument everywhere and need to vent. Some people need to have their credit cards withheld from them, for their own protection.
Sharkvelvet1
Superior Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2019
- Posts
- 2,654
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 6,197
- Points
- 208
- Location
- Miami (Florida, United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
I personally have never paid a dime for his flaky ass, but there should be accountability with OF and Dylan with how things currently are. Think about it, if you go to buy an appliance at a major distributor, there's always a store/factory warranty along with an opportunity to insure your product. OF is a major distributor and should be held to a similar standard.
I'd say in the least, they need to put a posting rate where they would average in how often a creator had posted in the three months prior to this one. So with him as an example, he had posted once in December, nothing in January, and once in February.
That's .6 posts/month. You can't have .6 of a post, so the counter on his page when you go to subscribe will show 0 posts per month before you verify your payment.
They either do that for transparency or OF has creators sign a contract that they'll be releasing content consisting of ______ themed content this many times a month on a specific timeline. If a creator fails to do so, they'll be liable to have to provide refunds to subscribers.
I kinda agree with both of the last two posters. I think people expect too much from OF sometimes, and some are too quick to raise an enormous, entitled fuss just because a creator isn’t doing what they want. And indeed, some people are definitely making poor decisions based on previous experience.
But I also think OF could use a little more transparency and accountability in the platform. Specific contracts might be taking it a little too far, but I’d love to see more stats about what the creator posts, how often, and better labeling for what to expect in feed content and especially PPVs.
But I also think OF could use a little more transparency and accountability in the platform. Specific contracts might be taking it a little too far, but I’d love to see more stats about what the creator posts, how often, and better labeling for what to expect in feed content and especially PPVs.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Posts
- 25,312
- Media
- 4
- Likes
- 149,678
- Points
- 458
- Location
- Saint Lucia
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- Pansexual
- Gender
- Male
Instead of the whole contract thing which I do think is too much. A rating system at least would be a helpful addition.
Some people (like Dylan) who rarely post or only post lackluster content will naturally get a lower score/rating and therefore less traffic overall.
Which could in turn incentivize them to improve as well to (increase their rating) . Seems like a win win all around.
- Status
