Easily offended?

[GoneA]

only ugly people should be censored. Their facial profiles that is.

 

[13788]

Jace: According to FCC guidelines here in the states, you can say fu*k on broadcast TV as long as it's not in a sexual context. That's one of the reasons the Janet Jackson thing caused such a stir.

But no ones had the balls to do it yet.

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Originally posted by HappyHammer1977@Oct 20 2005, 03:32 PM
I'll give you a couple of examples of what I'm getting at -

If a child is allowed to say 'poo' or even 'crap' (nowadays), why can't he say 'shit' when it means the same thing?

You can say and talk about sex, vaginas, penises et al all day on TV, but you can't say 'fuck', 'cunt' or 'cock' before 9pm (on British TV), even in context.

I'm not talking about people with a poor vocabulary, who just put swear-words into sentances to fill a silence, or like other people say 'very', they say 'fucking'.

[post=353527]Quoted post[/post]​

Dont' even pretend that that's remotely close, what with crime drama shows like, LAW & ORDER SVU OR NYPD BLUE who often times make references to human anatomy in much more ways than you'd have thought. Its even worse since TNT and USA networks gave birth to daytime syndication of these shows.

 

[jonb]

Originally posted by DC_DEEP+Oct 21 2005, 02:44 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DC_DEEP &#064; Oct 21 2005, 02:44 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Dr. Dilznick@Oct 21 2005, 05:59 PM
Nah, nigger tits are not deemed enticing enough for editing.

[post=354004]Quoted post[/post]​

Well, I still stand by the "educational" theory. There is a reason I renamed National Geographic magazine to National Pornographic.

[post=354013]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Those &#39;tribal&#39; specials actually get away with penis. Who knows? Maybe the censors thought the foreskin was some kind of clothing.

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick+Oct 21 2005, 09:59 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr. Dilznick &#064; Oct 21 2005, 09:59 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-DC_DEEP
For that matter, I have never understood why "tribal tits" are ok on broadcast, but "suburban tits" are not.  Is it because the "tribal tits" are educational, and "suburban tits" are tittilating?

Nah, nigger tits are not deemed enticing enough for editing.

[post=354004]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Interestingly enough there, Dr Dilznick, why do you feel it necessary to use a dispariging term like, and your words, "nigger tits?"

 

[Irish]

Originally posted by MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK+Oct 23 2005, 01:40 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK &#064; Oct 23 2005, 01:40 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick@Oct 21 2005, 09:59 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-DC_DEEP

For that matter, I have never understood why "tribal tits" are ok on broadcast, but "suburban tits" are not. Is it because the "tribal tits" are educational, and "suburban tits" are tittilating?

Nah, nigger tits are not deemed enticing enough for editing.

[post=354004]Quoted post[/post]​

Interestingly enough there, Dr Dilznick, why do you feel it necessary to use a dispariging term like, and your words, "nigger tits?"

[post=354570]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
I think it has to do with the fact that any time somebody brings up censorship, people who dislike it have a tendancy to do something that would normally be censored or considered offensive. I think it&#39;s called humor... :shrug:

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Originally posted by Irish+Oct 23 2005, 11:43 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Irish &#064; Oct 23 2005, 11:43 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK+Oct 23 2005, 01:40 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK &#064; Oct 23 2005, 01:40 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Dr. Dilznick@Oct 21 2005, 09:59 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-DC_DEEP

For that matter, I have never understood why "tribal tits" are ok on broadcast, but "suburban tits" are not.  Is it because the "tribal tits" are educational, and "suburban tits" are tittilating?

Nah, nigger tits are not deemed enticing enough for editing.

[post=354004]Quoted post[/post]​

Interestingly enough there, Dr Dilznick, why do you feel it necessary to use a dispariging term like, and your words, "nigger tits?"

[post=354570]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
I think it has to do with the fact that any time somebody brings up censorship, people who dislike it have a tendancy to do something that would normally be censored or considered offensive. I think it&#39;s called humor... :shrug:

[post=354655]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Humorous to some, terribly offensive to others.

 

[B_HappyHammer1977]

So, to sum up - no one cares about nudity or &#39;bad&#39; language.
Our message to the moral minority - get over it&#33;
:bounce:

 

[Dr. Dilznick]

Originally posted by MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK
Humorous to some, terribly offensive to others.

Agreed there, Chuck, I should mine the pure gold which are "The Holocaust was a Hoax" jokes next time.

 

[Alley Blue]

Originally posted by MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK+Oct 24 2005, 02:41 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK &#064; Oct 24 2005, 02:41 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by Irish+Oct 23 2005, 11:43 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Irish &#064; Oct 23 2005, 11:43 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK@Oct 23 2005, 01:40 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Dr. Dilznick

@Oct 21 2005, 09:59 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-DC_DEEP

For that matter, I have never understood why "tribal tits" are ok on broadcast, but "suburban tits" are not.  Is it because the "tribal tits" are educational, and "suburban tits" are tittilating?

Nah, nigger tits are not deemed enticing enough for editing.

[post=354004]Quoted post[/post]​

Interestingly enough there, Dr Dilznick, why do you feel it necessary to use a dispariging term like, and your words, "nigger tits?"

[post=354570]Quoted post[/post]​

I think it has to do with the fact that any time somebody brings up censorship, people who dislike it have a tendancy to do something that would normally be censored or considered offensive. I think it&#39;s called humor... :shrug:

[post=354655]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Humorous to some, terribly offensive to others.

[post=354685]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

Very true...........

 

[B_HappyHammer1977]

OK then folks, sub-question here: What do YOU find offensive?

 

[DC_DEEP]

Originally posted by HappyHammer1977@Oct 24 2005, 09:15 AM
OK then folks, sub-question here: What do YOU find offensive?

[post=354827]Quoted post[/post]​

People who cannot fathom the difference between retaining personal rights and curtailing the personal rights of others.

 

[B_HappyHammer1977]

Originally posted by DC_DEEP+Oct 24 2005, 03:17 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DC_DEEP &#064; Oct 24 2005, 03:17 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-HappyHammer1977@Oct 24 2005, 09:15 AM
OK then folks, sub-question here: What do YOU find offensive?

[post=354827]Quoted post[/post]​

People who cannot fathom the difference between retaining personal rights and curtailing the personal rights of others.

[post=354837]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

In English; Wankers&#33;

 

[Alley Blue]

Originally posted by HappyHammer1977+Oct 24 2005, 02:18 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(HappyHammer1977 &#064; Oct 24 2005, 02:18 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by DC_DEEP@Oct 24 2005, 03:17 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-HappyHammer1977

@Oct 24 2005, 09:15 AM
OK then folks, sub-question here: What do YOU find offensive?

[post=354827]Quoted post[/post]​

People who cannot fathom the difference between retaining personal rights and curtailing the personal rights of others.

[post=354837]Quoted post[/post]​

In English; Wankers&#33;

[post=354838]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]

And in ghetto; "Chicken necks"&#33;

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick+Oct 24 2005, 12:21 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr. Dilznick &#064; Oct 24 2005, 12:21 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK
Humorous to some, terribly offensive to others.

Agreed there, Chuck, I should mine the pure gold which are "The Holocaust was a Hoax" jokes next time.

[post=354808]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Oh, really there, Dr Dilznick? you mean to say you&#39;d actually have the cajones to do that?

 

[B_HappyHammer1977]

Originally posted by Alley Blue+Oct 24 2005, 03:32 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Alley Blue &#064; Oct 24 2005, 03:32 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>

Originally posted by HappyHammer1977@Oct 24 2005, 02:18 PM

Originally posted by DC_DEEP@Oct 24 2005, 03:17 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-HappyHammer1977

@Oct 24 2005, 09:15 AM
OK then folks, sub-question here: What do YOU find offensive?

[post=354827]Quoted post[/post]​

People who cannot fathom the difference between retaining personal rights and curtailing the personal rights of others.

[post=354837]Quoted post[/post]​

In English; Wankers&#33;

[post=354838]Quoted post[/post]​

And in ghetto; "Chicken necks"&#33;

[post=354843]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]


in french; branleurs ignorants

 

[B_HappyHammer1977]

Originally posted by Jace@Oct 22 2005, 08:32 AM
According to FCC guidelines here in the states, you can say fu*k on broadcast TV as long as it&#39;s not in a sexual context. That&#39;s one of the reasons the Janet Jackson thing caused such a stir.

But no ones had the balls to do it yet.

[post=354127]Quoted post[/post]​

But that is so stupid&#33; So you can say "fuck" as long as it&#39;s "fuck off" for example. And if a &#39;married couple&#39; on TV say "let&#39;s fuck" that&#39;s not allowed?&#33; If that&#39;s the case, it&#39;s backwards. The sexual context is exactly what the word means&#33;

 

[Dr. Dilznick]

Originally posted by MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK
Oh, really there, Dr Dilznick? you mean to say you&#39;d actually have the cajones to do that?

Were you born with a leaky vagina or did it develop over time?

 

[Dr Rock]

Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick@Oct 24 2005, 12:21 PM
Agreed there, Chuck, I should mine the pure gold which are "The Holocaust was a Hoax" jokes next time.

[post=354808]Quoted post[/post]​

pffft. straightforward holocaust jokes are way funnier than holocaust-hoax jokes; the latter imply that millions of people WEREN&#39;T systematically exterminated, and i don&#39;t honestly see how anything could be funnier than that.

 

[MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK]

Originally posted by Dr. Dilznick+Oct 26 2005, 06:05 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr. Dilznick &#064; Oct 26 2005, 06:05 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-MASSIVEPKGO_CHUCK
Oh, really there, Dr Dilznick? you mean to say you&#39;d actually have the cajones to do that?

Were you born with a leaky vagina or did it develop over time?

[post=355500]Quoted post[/post]​

[/b][/quote]
Y&#39;know, I honestly don&#39;t understand your need for shock value on subjects there, Dr Dilznick.

Seriously tho, you must have played under power lines when you were a kid to be this fucked up.