Huge boy
- Thread starter mma_18
- Start date
thirteenbyseven
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2004
- Posts
- 2,434
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,542
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Orange County, SoCal
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Those photos have been in circulation for decades and they are indisputably real. If one compares objects such as the radio on the nightstand with the young man's penis, than his flaccid must be in the 10" range while his erection is somewhere in the mid-teens or higher. It is a truly remarkable organ. I did some research and these same photos are extensively discussed here at LPSG. The origins of the individual range from a youth in central or South America to someone in the U.S. circa mid-1960s.
Note: on page one of this thread there is another photo of a man with a gigantic penis extending to his knees that is sometimes attributed to German medical photos taken from the 1930s; possibly a study in eugenics.
Note: on page one of this thread there is another photo of a man with a gigantic penis extending to his knees that is sometimes attributed to German medical photos taken from the 1930s; possibly a study in eugenics.
Good god, they're from a series called Super Hung published by the (now-defunct) gay publishing company called Xanadu. Of course they've been morphed! The pictures are for fantasy purposes only. It beggars belief how many people believe these pictures are real.
You must be referring to the first of the pictures I just uploaded, which I see circulating around various gay websites, wrongly attributed to a German medical journal (of dubious origin) under the title Megaphallus or Macro-phallus. It's a fake. And the publisher never tried to pretend otherwise.
B_blueonblue1964
Sexy Member
thirteenbyseven
Legendary Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2004
- Posts
- 2,434
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 1,542
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Orange County, SoCal
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
If they are indeed doctored than the photoshopper was a true artist. Notice on photo three (the uncircumcised model) how the shadows fall perfectly to the right of his penis? There are also no overt signs on those photos where the organs and bodies merge, nor the pigmentation differences and other telltale giveaways typical of photoshopping. Remember these photos were done decades ago.
Not that I'm divulging any secrets, but FuzzyKen is somewhat of a celebrity with regard to the publishing of penis size material and research into penis enlargement. At one time he and the late Gary Griffin were collaborative partners in a number of books. Perhaps he can add his expertise as to the source and authenticity of these photos.
seffnerman
Just Browsing
- Joined
- May 16, 2011
- Posts
- 80
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 91
- Location
- seffner fl
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
well i seen his pics b4 he is big but the site i saw his pics on showed pics b4 the touch up and the ones after he is big i say he looked over 9 but they photo shopped them and made him bigger haha i don't know why like i said he saw big in the pics b4
B_blueonblue1964
Sexy Member
Anyone with more pictures of the original Huge Boy {the one who inspired this thread}, please E-Mail the pics to me at thickanduncut1964@gmail.com I appreciate the help, guys!
Vein Man
Sexy Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2006
- Posts
- 253
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 35
- Points
- 248
- Location
- Sydney (New South Wales, Australia)
- Sexuality
- 50% Straight, 50% Gay
- Gender
- Male
The Photoshop/Pre-Photoshop argument does not hold. There was photo-retouching before Photoshop. What Photoshop did was make image manipulation the domain of everyman. Before Photoshop image manipulation was the domain of expert specialists whose skills of perception and craft were of a far higher order than the majority of dabblers that play today.
As an entertainment the pictures are fascinating and exciting — fabulous fantasy fodder. Do we need to remove the magician's black cloth of secrecy and ruin the fun with forensics or can we just enjoy the show?
Cheers,
As an entertainment the pictures are fascinating and exciting — fabulous fantasy fodder. Do we need to remove the magician's black cloth of secrecy and ruin the fun with forensics or can we just enjoy the show?
Cheers,
Yes, it was called airbrushing. It was an art and was used on most major magazines.
No, that is NOT the same guy!
He might or he might not be. The penis shape is similar. But you say with such positivity and anger that it is not the same guy. So I ask you, you know this how?
