Interesting

Oy, Scalia. Now THERE'S someone who can't decide if the strict law matters or the intent. (You'll notice the "intent" never refers to laws passed within the last sixty or so years, where there might be a Congressman out there who actually remembers the debate on said law.)

One of the things about Bush v. Gore is, they even said it wouldn't be precedent. Meaning they were just bending the rules this one time.
 
Originally posted by jonb@Jan 11 2005, 07:27 PM

One of the things about Bush v. Gore is, they even said it wouldn't be precedent. Meaning they were just bending the rules this one time.
[post=274076]Quoted post[/post]​

Until the next time........oh, right 2004 was the next time.

What Constitution? How quaint, kinda' like the Geneva Convention.
 
Originally posted by KinkGuy+Jan 12 2005, 12:17 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KinkGuy &#064; Jan 12 2005, 12:17 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-jonb@Jan 11 2005, 07:27 PM

One of the things about Bush v. Gore is, they even said it wouldn&#39;t be precedent. Meaning they were just bending the rules this one time.
[post=274076]Quoted post[/post]​

Until the next time........oh, right 2004 was the next time.

What Constitution? How quaint, kinda&#39; like the Geneva Convention.
[post=274139]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]
You haven&#39;t seen anything yet. Just wait until all those new justices get on the court compliments of the present occupent of the White House. The First Ten Amendments refered to as the /ill of Rights. ( the letter after a is not working right now,) wll /e completely done away with and rewritten. This forum will /e illegal within four years. The federal government will completely control the internet /y then. Freedom of the Press will /e a thing of the past. history.
 
Originally posted by KinkGuy@Jan 12 2005, 05:17 AM

How quaint, kinda&#39; like the Geneva Convention.

I&#39;m still disappointed and dismayed that Abu Gonzales, a lawyer who advocated that the president circumvent or ignore inconvenient laws and treaties, is going to be the next Attorney General of the United States.

SG
 
....and the guy named to head Department of Homeland Security was another architect of torture and imprisonment American Style.

Have these people no sense of common decency? I seem to recall hearing somewhere about "Do unto others. . ." Yea, just another quaint idea for true Christians.

jay
 
Well, the problem is that the Democrats have no spine. Until we in the reality-based community manage a chthonic takeover of the Democrats the way fundies did with the Republicans, they won&#39;t.
 
While disappointing, I can&#39;t say either appointment was a surprise. I am actually far more depressed about Gonzales than bush because his term has no limits. We are headed nowhere good.....