James moore

Northerner2023

Worshipped Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Posts
5,648
Media
0
Likes
11,536
Points
433
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
One thing I have recently come to discover on this site is the fact there are alot of Jimmy Savilles on here and its truly frightening how they dont even try to mask what their into its almost asif there proud of being able to relish in it on the site. Romeo Beckham now has a page, yes he's 18 but the comments are absolutely abhorrent discussing how they have wanted him for years and such and the site does nothing about it...
 

natesuxx

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Posts
736
Media
0
Likes
1,925
Points
273
One thing I have recently come to discover on this site is the fact there are alot of Jimmy Savilles on here and its truly frightening how they dont even try to mask what their into its almost asif there proud of being able to relish in it on the site. Romeo Beckham now has a page, yes he's 18 but the comments are absolutely abhorrent discussing how they have wanted him for years and such and the site does nothing about it...

Absolutely. I’ve said this for a long time. Some people here smell of the whole “if I wank to a picture of a kid it’s not a crime because nobody is getting hurt and it’s my fetish” types.
 

BUA

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Posts
638
Media
0
Likes
1,705
Points
188
Location
United Kingdom
Sexuality
No Response
There is always someone so quick to defend child porn on here...like it’s insane how many of you are on this site.

Haven't been on the site as long as you, but I really did start noticing it more when all the tiktok threads started. Like, obviously underage people on tiktok and there's pages and pages of grown men lusting over them.

Back to James Moore though. The crime he was charged with includes the phrase "being in possession of". So he quite clearly broke the law and even admitted it in his instagram story when he said he was sent indecent videos.
 
D

deleted355382

Guest
There is always someone so quick to defend child porn on here...like it’s insane how many of you are on this site.

Nope, not at all. You seem to want to put words in my mouth to suit your agenda. I'm not defending child porn. Your conflating the issue entirely.

The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing.

He may be one. And if he is, I certainly won't defend him. But just because somebody is accused of something doesn't mean they are guilty.

He's got a prominent profile, he must get shit tonnes of DMs and messages through the different channels. Even I've had some very dicey stuff that I've had the sense to delete, report and block straight away from actual children doing all sorts. Kik is awful for it, which is why I'm not on there anymore.

It's great calling him Jimmy Saville and all that, but if you were charged with something... would you prefer that the public and ultimately potential jurors actually waited for the full facts of the case?

Just saying, none of us know shit yet really.
 

BUA

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Posts
638
Media
0
Likes
1,705
Points
188
Location
United Kingdom
Sexuality
No Response
Nope, not at all. You seem to want to put words in my mouth to suit your agenda. I'm not defending child porn. Your conflating the issue entirely.

The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing.

He may be one. And if he is, I certainly won't defend him. But just because somebody is accused of something doesn't mean they are guilty.

He's got a prominent profile, he must get shit tonnes of DMs and messages through the different channels. Even I've had some very dicey stuff that I've had the sense to delete, report and block straight away from actual children doing all sorts. Kik is awful for it, which is why I'm not on there anymore.

It's great calling him Jimmy Saville and all that, but if you were charged with something... would you prefer that the public and ultimately potential jurors actually waited for the full facts of the case?

Just saying, none of us know shit yet really.

He's already freely admitted to being in possession of indecent images.

To be charged with "being in possession of indecent images of children", you need to be... Wait for it... In possession of indecent images of children.
 
D

deleted355382

Guest
He's already freely admitted to being in possession of indecent images.

To be charged with "being in possession of indecent images of children", you need to be... Wait for it... In possession of indecent images of children.
Obviously didnt read my message and just decided to reply, so I'll just leave that discussion there. Thanks for the intelligent conversation...
 
D

deleted355382

Guest
It’s still disgusting and grown adults should not be lusting over people young enough to be their children or underage. There’s plenty of people around your own age.
I'm not sure anybody has said that it isn't.
 

BUA

Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Posts
638
Media
0
Likes
1,705
Points
188
Location
United Kingdom
Sexuality
No Response
Obviously didnt read my message and just decided to reply, so I'll just leave that discussion there. Thanks for the intelligent conversation...

"The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing."

I read it. Keep simping for a nonce. Maybe he'll give you his noncey cock when he finds out you defended him online. :mask:
 

shaun217

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Posts
300
Media
0
Likes
2,460
Points
313
Location
London, UK
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
In the UK, images between 16-18 aren't always prosecuted unless there are aggravating factors. That makes me think it's probably true that he was sent pictures from someone who he thought looked over 18, and then he aggravated the situation by sharing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luciano1995
D

deleted355382

Guest
"The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing."

I read it. Keep simping for a nonce. Maybe he'll give you his noncey cock when he finds out you defended him online. :mask:
Again though you haven't read it and taken it in as a whole, you're picking bits out that you take issue with. I'm not defending him "per say". I work in HR and I've seen plenty of people accused in similar circumstances and i have seen the impact first hand when online and social whips up a storm only for the individual to later be found through actual investigation of the facts to be innocent. I'm pointing out that you do not know enough to hang him yet.

By your logic somebody could send you images containing sexual acts with a minor and you become a nonse. Are they not within your possession? I've seen this very thing be done maliciously by an individual who was later charged - but it did not stop the accusation from ruining the accused life who was entirely innocent.

I am not saying he is or is not anything. None of us know enough yet. Simple.

I would advocate that it is entirely irresponsible of the press and boards like this to report on this before relevant authorities have done their work. And I'll take no argument on public interest as relevant bodies and individuals would manage any risks while the work is being done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pereda and Karim

nicopp99

Cherished Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
436
Points
83
Location
Vienna (Austria)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
yo he gotta say hi to jail .... fuck that hes a sick mf and people still talking that talk its kinda ok to own such images, yall are sick too. thats whats wrong with society nowadays. na a fuck that he is a potential child molester and animal abuser so he is soooo cancelled 4 me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dmath1926

nicopp99

Cherished Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
436
Points
83
Location
Vienna (Austria)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
yo he gotta say hi to jail .... fuck that hes a sick mf and people still talking that talk its kinda ok to own such images, yall are sick too. thats whats wrong with society nowadays. na a fuck that he is a potential child molester and animal abuser so he is soooo cancelled 4 me.