James moore

One thing I have recently come to discover on this site is the fact there are alot of Jimmy Savilles on here and its truly frightening how they dont even try to mask what their into its almost asif there proud of being able to relish in it on the site. Romeo Beckham now has a page, yes he's 18 but the comments are absolutely abhorrent discussing how they have wanted him for years and such and the site does nothing about it...
 
One thing I have recently come to discover on this site is the fact there are alot of Jimmy Savilles on here and its truly frightening how they dont even try to mask what their into its almost asif there proud of being able to relish in it on the site. Romeo Beckham now has a page, yes he's 18 but the comments are absolutely abhorrent discussing how they have wanted him for years and such and the site does nothing about it...

Absolutely. I’ve said this for a long time. Some people here smell of the whole “if I wank to a picture of a kid it’s not a crime because nobody is getting hurt and it’s my fetish” types.
 
There is always someone so quick to defend child porn on here...like it’s insane how many of you are on this site.

Haven't been on the site as long as you, but I really did start noticing it more when all the tiktok threads started. Like, obviously underage people on tiktok and there's pages and pages of grown men lusting over them.

Back to James Moore though. The crime he was charged with includes the phrase "being in possession of". So he quite clearly broke the law and even admitted it in his instagram story when he said he was sent indecent videos.
 
There is always someone so quick to defend child porn on here...like it’s insane how many of you are on this site.

Nope, not at all. You seem to want to put words in my mouth to suit your agenda. I'm not defending child porn. Your conflating the issue entirely.

The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing.

He may be one. And if he is, I certainly won't defend him. But just because somebody is accused of something doesn't mean they are guilty.

He's got a prominent profile, he must get shit tonnes of DMs and messages through the different channels. Even I've had some very dicey stuff that I've had the sense to delete, report and block straight away from actual children doing all sorts. Kik is awful for it, which is why I'm not on there anymore.

It's great calling him Jimmy Saville and all that, but if you were charged with something... would you prefer that the public and ultimately potential jurors actually waited for the full facts of the case?

Just saying, none of us know shit yet really.
 
Nope, not at all. You seem to want to put words in my mouth to suit your agenda. I'm not defending child porn. Your conflating the issue entirely.

The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing.

He may be one. And if he is, I certainly won't defend him. But just because somebody is accused of something doesn't mean they are guilty.

He's got a prominent profile, he must get shit tonnes of DMs and messages through the different channels. Even I've had some very dicey stuff that I've had the sense to delete, report and block straight away from actual children doing all sorts. Kik is awful for it, which is why I'm not on there anymore.

It's great calling him Jimmy Saville and all that, but if you were charged with something... would you prefer that the public and ultimately potential jurors actually waited for the full facts of the case?

Just saying, none of us know shit yet really.

He's already freely admitted to being in possession of indecent images.

To be charged with "being in possession of indecent images of children", you need to be... Wait for it... In possession of indecent images of children.
 
He's already freely admitted to being in possession of indecent images.

To be charged with "being in possession of indecent images of children", you need to be... Wait for it... In possession of indecent images of children.
Obviously didnt read my message and just decided to reply, so I'll just leave that discussion there. Thanks for the intelligent conversation...
 
It’s still disgusting and grown adults should not be lusting over people young enough to be their children or underage. There’s plenty of people around your own age.
I'm not sure anybody has said that it isn't.
 
Obviously didnt read my message and just decided to reply, so I'll just leave that discussion there. Thanks for the intelligent conversation...

"The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing."

I read it. Keep simping for a nonce. Maybe he'll give you his noncey cock when he finds out you defended him online. :mask:
 
In the UK, images between 16-18 aren't always prosecuted unless there are aggravating factors. That makes me think it's probably true that he was sent pictures from someone who he thought looked over 18, and then he aggravated the situation by sharing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luciano1995
"The issue is you're dead ass sure he's a peado when you know nothing."

I read it. Keep simping for a nonce. Maybe he'll give you his noncey cock when he finds out you defended him online. :mask:
Again though you haven't read it and taken it in as a whole, you're picking bits out that you take issue with. I'm not defending him "per say". I work in HR and I've seen plenty of people accused in similar circumstances and i have seen the impact first hand when online and social whips up a storm only for the individual to later be found through actual investigation of the facts to be innocent. I'm pointing out that you do not know enough to hang him yet.

By your logic somebody could send you images containing sexual acts with a minor and you become a nonse. Are they not within your possession? I've seen this very thing be done maliciously by an individual who was later charged - but it did not stop the accusation from ruining the accused life who was entirely innocent.

I am not saying he is or is not anything. None of us know enough yet. Simple.

I would advocate that it is entirely irresponsible of the press and boards like this to report on this before relevant authorities have done their work. And I'll take no argument on public interest as relevant bodies and individuals would manage any risks while the work is being done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pereda and Karim
yo he gotta say hi to jail .... fuck that hes a sick mf and people still talking that talk its kinda ok to own such images, yall are sick too. thats whats wrong with society nowadays. na a fuck that he is a potential child molester and animal abuser so he is soooo cancelled 4 me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dmath1926
yo he gotta say hi to jail .... fuck that hes a sick mf and people still talking that talk its kinda ok to own such images, yall are sick too. thats whats wrong with society nowadays. na a fuck that he is a potential child molester and animal abuser so he is soooo cancelled 4 me.
 
By your logic somebody could send you images containing sexual acts with a minor and you become a nonse.ed - but it did not stop the accusation from ruining the accused life who was entirely innocent.

He was also charged for sharing pictures too...