Jon Hamm

Much to do about nothing.

Christina Hendrick's large boobs are "enhanced" by cameras for viewer's pleasure. Yet, they cry foul over a far less intrusive VPL that is never "in your face" as are Hindrick's boobs in certain camera shots.

Jon Ham m is big and tall, you have to expect his manly appendage to be proportional.

And BTW, some of the images have been photoshopped to add shape of penis onto his pants.
 
Much to do about nothing.

Christina Hendrick's large boobs are "enhanced" by cameras for viewer's pleasure. Yet, they cry foul over a far less intrusive VPL that is never "in your face" as are Hindrick's boobs in certain camera shots.

Jon Ham m is big and tall, you have to expect his manly appendage to be proportional.

And BTW, some of the images have been photoshopped to add shape of penis onto his pants.

The manly appendage has been proven to NOT be proportional to ANY other bod part. Is this so difficult to believe?
 
Jon Ham m is big and tall, you have to expect his manly appendage to be proportional.

And BTW, some of the images have been photoshopped to add shape of penis onto his pants.


1) Jon Hamm's height (5'11"-6', which means he isn't extremely tall) has nothing to do with the size of his cock. Some tall men have small to average sized dicks, and some little guys have huge monsters. It varies.

2) The pics of him walking down the street with his girlfriend may be enhanced to show penile outline, but he's clearly a constant VPL shower, and it's clearly huge. Even when he wears suits, it looks like a kielbasa going down his leg.
 
I thought those pics of his junk walking down the street with his g-friend looked enhanced.

But I thought it looked like they only enhanced what was already there (ie enhancing the shadow and light). I don't think they created or added to/made larger the VPL.

I still think it's all him.