Which makes him a person who produced child pornography and could be charged for making, selling and distribution. Hmm, indeed.Right. The vids of him with chest tattoo alone are also underage. He was 17 at the time
Which raises the question: (pardon my ignorance of this legal stuff).. could someone who downloaded the video believing he was of age at the time be arrested for it? It was advertised as if he was of age, and how often do we card every actor in every porn we watch? We take the production company's word for it, but in this case it was self produced and distributed by MichaelWhich makes him a person who produced child pornography and could be charged for making, selling and distribution. Hmm, indeed.
He sold them privately at first, they were custom made so he must’ve told people he was of legal age. Then he sold the videos when the leaks started. So I think it’s a grey area I wouldn’t want to be in.Which raises the question: (pardon my ignorance of this legal stuff).. could someone who downloaded the video believing he was of age at the time be arrested for it? It was advertised as if he was of age, and how often do we card every actor in every porn we watch? We take the production company's word for it, but in this case it was self produced and distributed by Michael
What site was he on promoting himself. I never followed him in the early years.He sold them privately at first, they were custom made so he must’ve told people he was of legal age. Then he sold the videos when the leaks started. So I think it’s a grey area I wouldn’t want to be in.
Private custom videos. I didn’t start noticing him when the leaks started. I do know he sold his videos to Brent Everett and his husband, Steve.What site was he on promoting himself. I never followed him in the early years.
Ok, great, I’ll sue ur ass for child porn possession. See u in the court honey
I know about the Brent E issue. I don't recall age playing a role in it. Even if he was selling custom vids he would have to be on a site. Was it an adult site? Would have had to show ID. Fake ID, somebody would be in trouble if underaged.Private custom videos. I didn’t start noticing him when the leaks started. I do know he sold his videos to Brent Everett and his husband, Steve.
This is the first time I’m hearing about him being underage, but I don’t follow bodybuilding forums, si I couldn’t tell you which one he was on at the time. I guess it wouldn’t be to hard to find.I know about the Brent E issue. I don't recall age playing a role in it. Even if he was selling custom vids he would have to be on a site. Was it an adult site? Would have had to show ID. Fake ID, somebody would be in trouble if underaged.
Can't see so many years passing and authorities not taking notice, with the crack down on underage crap.
He sold them privately at first, they were custom made so he must’ve told people he was of legal age. Then he sold the videos when the leaks started. So I think it’s a grey area I wouldn’t want to be in.
Yeah they started about ten years ago, now charging teens for sexting.If anything the one who would be in most trouble would be Michael because everyone else didnt know. He knew exactly what he was doing. I see a lot of under 18 year olds getting charge with child porn distribution as they should be.
How do u know for sure? R u a lawyer?the people who got the private stuff would still get in legal trouble. even if they didn't know he was underage, they were still in possession of child pornography. if they were able to prove he lied about his age to them, then maybe they could get less of a harsh sentence. but they'd still be in trouble for possession. and if it was just a message of him saying he's legal, that could not be enough, probably depending on the judge/jury. i can totally see a judge or the opposition's lawyer saying "well, if the age was questionable, why wasn't a form of id requested?".
the laws with that are very harsh, and they'll fuck over anyone. a minor sending nudes to another minor is breaking the law for producing and distributing cp, and the minor receiving them is breaking the law for having them
Not to be negative, but they have apps that can create fake posts. I'm not going to discredit anybody, but actions must back words to get my support. These days there are too many people talking nice and acting badly.View attachment 7530871
Everyone in the comments is applauding him
Unfortunately he doesn’t post new pics...![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.