More Bottoms Than Tops

I also think femininity has to do with it. I understand that a lot of gay men are feminine but that’s still not a substitute for manhood?

I'm not sure quite where you understand this from? A lot of gay men are also not feminine and those that are, are just very comfortable in themselves.

Also being a more 'feminine' guy doesn't make you a bottom, they can be top as well.

I've dated some very outwardly masculine guys - body builder types - and they were very happy bottoming, so we need to avoid stereotypes and assumptions;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jf22
I'm not sure quite where you understand this from? A lot of gay men are also not feminine and those that are, are just very comfortable in themselves.

Also being a more 'feminine' guy doesn't make you a bottom, they can be top as well.

I've dated some very outwardly masculine guys - body builder types - and they were very happy bottoming, so we need to avoid stereotypes and assumptions;-)

Ok I agree but none of that had anything to do with what I said. Also this is my experience.
 
Ok I agree but none of that had anything to do with what I said. Also this is my experience.

yes it was related to what you said "I understand that a lot of gay men are feminine but that’s still not a substitute for manhood? If that makes sense?" i was just pointing out that your statement is not complete and doesn't represent the full spectrum of gay people.

your experience is your experience i'm not disputing that, merely pointing out that it is quite a narrow view/experience of gay men.
 
yes it was related to what you said "I understand that a lot of gay men are feminine but that’s still not a substitute for manhood? If that makes sense?" i was just pointing out that your statement is not complete and doesn't represent the full spectrum of gay people.

your experience is your experience i'm not disputing that, merely pointing out that it is quite a narrow view/experience of gay men.

well I’m speaking about a specific group
 
I think the problem is bottoms are narrowminded in what they look for in a top. They say they want a top but they really want a top whos ultra masculine presenting, muscles/athletic, dominant… etc. they tend to ignore all the other tops that dont fit a very specific mold.
Not me. I’m an equal opportunity bottom. If you’re a good top, like to give pleasure to the bottom man, then I’m down for it. Cock size, body type, matter little.
 
So why don’t bottoms like to fuck? I mean we’re all guys right? Should we usually take turns? Or atleast sometimes?

I’m really more versatile than my sex life would lead one to believe. I’m cool with taking my turn on top. Trouble is, most guys want to fuck me rather than the other way around. Which, BTW, I’m cool with. I guess something about my body type, or my vibe, makes guys assume I’m a bottom. That, and the “Fuck Me” socks that I wear to sex parties, I suppose. ;-)
 
With a cock and set of balls like yours it’s nice to know you don’t mind climbing on top to stretch and fill a hole; or let them swing with each thrust deeper into your tight ass.
Thanks buddy. Now I’m blushing.
 
A lot of White men see Black men as walking tops/dildos - which is preposterous and very narrow-minded. Black men have beautiful butts and we enjoy dicks in it.

And a lot of whites compensate these walking tops and dildos VERY well..Not to mention the white muscular bottoms (that whites assumes don’t/won’t get fucked by black men) show up at cum dumps to be fucked by well endowed black men only to invite their friends to get fucked as well or throw their own parties inviting only black men…
 
I know this is common in a lot of places, but here in the Middle East it’s even worse; tops usually don’t get on apps or put themselves out there as much as bottoms do. If I get on Grindr almost everyone is a bottom (or claiming to be verse) around me. Tops don’t have pics or info in their profile and delete then make another profile often. I’ve found more tops just interacting in person (parties/bars/gyms..etc) than I did on apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaniLover
If you’re lazy, or have little imagination, or confidence, or are inhibited in some way, it’s easier to be a bottom than a top. You won’t be a very good bottom, but you can put yourself out there and look credible from a distance. Harder to pull that off as a top.

In reality both roles require qualities (possibly different) if you want to do them well. But few guys have what it takes and are prepared to do the work. In my opinion that’s why most guys instinctively go for the bottom role. However, good bottoms are as rare as good tops.
 
i know not scientific, but there is a thread (sorry don't know how to link it doh!!) under the AAGM forum 'top or bottom and why' which shows self selected; top 23%, bottom 43% vers 34% - ok relatively low numbers but would seem to indicate that there are far fewer tops out there than bottom guys/bottom vers guys??

so does that show the answer to be a truism??
 
i know not scientific, but there is a thread (sorry don't know how to link it doh!!) under the AAGM forum 'top or bottom and why' which shows self selected; top 23%, bottom 43% vers 34% - ok relatively low numbers but would seem to indicate that there are far fewer tops out there than bottom guys/bottom vers guys??

so does that show the answer to be a truism??
Not really due to sample bias.

Yes it has diversified, but LPSG is a large penis appreciation forum first and foremost. So you could say that’s more likely to attract bottoms. A “nice butthole” forum would probably turn out different responses.
 
Not really due to sample bias.

Yes it has diversified, but LPSG is a large penis appreciation forum first and foremost. So you could say that’s more likely to attract bottoms. A “nice butthole” forum would probably turn out different responses.

i did say i know not scientific ;-) how do you know there is a sample bias??