heisenbergwhite1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Posts
- 560
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,188
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Fucking, Austria
- Sexuality
- 69% Gay, 31% Straight
SilentButDeadly
Superior Member
I thought that but didn’t say anything… LMAOOO
Attachments
SilentButDeadly
Superior Member
Guess I'm supposed to join the party and imagine a bulge there too
can someone send me the dick pick on the right please?
![1661813023088.png]( "1661813023088.png")
i'm not stealing images i just copied the image to use it to specify what i'm on about
Did his dick pics actually leak???
Not sure. Before there was just the first post of the thread and the support message, but now the whole first page is back?
I only use LPSG for youtuber threads
Same pretty much.
They did explain the reasoning somewhere, but they deleted the post along with the posts who originally brought it up. They basically said they weren't happy with certain conversations going on in the gnf and Karl threads and that the decision was also partially fuelled by their audience being a younger demographic they don't want on the site. They also said they, as people not in the know about it, don't need people speculating about their nudes, but that contradicts a good chunk of the website and a lot of people don't strictly want nudes in the first place and are more than happy to see people without shirts or bulging out the front.
And with a quick search term I just found Karl's first page and 18 pages of gnf are back and you're seemingly able to reply again? Very odd.
heisenbergwhite1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Posts
- 560
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,188
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Fucking, Austria
- Sexuality
- 69% Gay, 31% Straight
All the stuff to do with this is really weird. Not sure whats going on, must be some disagreements amongst LPSG staff or something. Don't know why anyone would feel the need to suddenly change things now but hey ho.
I asked them what is going on after they closed gnf thread and got this:
"George is just a Youtuber. He's not an onlyfans guy. He's young he's shy. We are removing some threads that feel like they don't belong on LPSG. There were recent articles written about LPSG that painted the site in a negative light. It portrayed users as predatory who are looking for nudes of innocent young men. That is not what we want LPSG to be or be known for. As such we have removed the thread."
It is really weird. Why is simping over MC Youtubers not okay, but its fine to graphically describe fantasies (sometimes even rape) in threads about other young celebrities? Because George giggles a lot and Tom Holland tries to be serious nowadays? And how is all of that less ethical than stealing OF content or sharing illegally obtained nudes which is the base of this site?
heisenbergwhite1
Legendary Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Posts
- 560
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,188
- Points
- 188
- Location
- Fucking, Austria
- Sexuality
- 69% Gay, 31% Straight
Seems like a bit of an overreaction to getting some bad press. I get why they're doing it but it'd probably be better for everyone if they just let things be. Media or whoever are probably gonna say that stuff about the site regardless of any of this and I don't think suddenly nuking a bunch of threads based off of whether or not someone of legal age seems a bit 'innocent' or not is gonna do any good. Shrug.
I decided to look for these articles. The main one I've looked at from NYT is questioning the sites policies on revenge porn and why those policies are less protected after someone got fire from their job as result of it being posted here and wanted to file a lawsuit against the poster. Thing is, the article also pointed out that when people made a new thread for the guy, the people of the website were sympathetic and asked those people to stop; it's a surprisingly neutral article. Other articles I've looked at more briefly aren't really giving the site a bad name either, they just briefly being mentioned it as being where the porn came from or pointed out the broader company is being sued; I couldn't find an article that said all the users were predatory, just the guy who posted that shit.
Looks like they're clapping back against revenge porn harder? But I really don't see how getting rid of YouTuber threads solves that. And if YouTubers shouldn't be subject to it, why is it okay for people to do the same for mainstream celebrities? I also don't really remember revenge porn having a prevalence on the Karl or George threads and I'm in a lot of other YouTuber threads where revenge porn doesn't even get a mention and people just want to gawk at a man with no shirt. And then there's the "young" comment; so it's okay for people to wait until the exact day someone is 18 to make a thread, but the second you simp over a 25 year old and 24 year old, you've crossed the line on young people?,
Seems like an extreme and ridiculous solution that takes way more effort than it's worth for a hardly tarnished image, and a solution that can't really be executed consistently if some of the words they're qualifying it off are "young", "shy" and "innocent", where "young" includes people who are 25 years old. It feels like you can shut down this whole website if it's on the grounds it contains content of people who are of legal age, but less than 26, people who are shy, and people who seem innocent, which is not only quite subjective, but you also could never actually know how "innocent" a person is... I understand the worry, but this is complete nonsense.
I really don't get all of this, it's not like George is 18 or anything, isn´t he like 26?
If the argument is that his fanbase is young then it's worse, why would we want to make this a better site for minors? I can't think of any porn company that banned guys dressed as superheroes because their fanbase is young.
This site was the only place where we could talk about these people without creepy fanfiction and fantasies and people who openly say they are minors, but now it seems like we'll have to conform with that, because we are the bad guys here
If the argument is that his fanbase is young then it's worse, why would we want to make this a better site for minors? I can't think of any porn company that banned guys dressed as superheroes because their fanbase is young.
This site was the only place where we could talk about these people without creepy fanfiction and fantasies and people who openly say they are minors, but now it seems like we'll have to conform with that, because we are the bad guys here
Last edited:
SilentButDeadly
Superior Member
There can be threads for dudes 0.5 seconds after they turn 18, but god forbid we talk about some guy in his late 20s who plays Minecraft
Similar threads
