Nick skoufatos

[Gyojun]

He’s only like 6 feet right? I just think no matter how muscly and good looking a guys is, if they’re not at least 6’2 - 6’3, he’s just not a ten for ME.

I repeat, for ME.

Are you a 6'1" bottom?

 

[CakeHungry]

He’s only like 6 feet right? I just think no matter how muscly and good looking a guys is, if they’re not at least 6’2 - 6’3, he’s just not a ten for ME.

I repeat, for ME.

"Only 6feet" OMG gay guys are such karens . You and your standards are so ridiculous

 

[Jtopliy]

"Only 6feet" OMG gay guys are such karens . You and your standards are so ridiculous

Never understood the height preference thing. It's something people can't change, so it's just another prejudice tbh. As if we don't already have enough of those to deal with already

 

[helenhunt]

he's prob a super sized bottom guys

 

[today952021]

Are you a 6'1" bottom?

It’s like asking someone who loves eating spinach “are you a rabbit?” Lol literally what I am or look like have nothing to do with what I like to eat or jerk off and cum the hardest to

 

[today952021]

"Only 6feet" OMG gay guys are such karens . You and your standards are so ridiculous

Y’all treating like my rating for Nick is like a 6 or something lollll he’s definitely a 9 in my eye

 

[today952021]

Never understood the height preference thing. It's something people can't change, so it's just another prejudice tbh. As if we don't already have enough of those to deal with already

thinking a 6 foot white cis male is not a 10 is not prejudice… yall need to chill and it’s not like I wouldn’t date or fuck him if given the opportunity cuz he’s not 6’2 lol

 

[Jtopliy]

thinking a 6 foot white cis male is not a 10 is not prejudice… yall need to chill and it’s not like I wouldn’t date or fuck him if given the opportunity cuz he’s not 6’2 lol

Now why have you added all that extra stuff?

 

[today952021]

Now why have you added all that extra stuff?

Cuz in life everything has context?

Finding someone, who’s already conventionally attractive to most people, not a 10 cuz of his height is far from prejudice.

But ultimately I agree with you, I didn’t need to add all that “extra”. Cuz finding someone’s height not that attractive is not prejudice. Full stop.

I didn’t say Nick is ugly cuz he’s not tall enough, or it’s a deal breaker. All I said was he’s not perfect to me. Please chill lol

 

[Gyojun]

It’s like asking someone who loves eating spinach “are you a rabbit?” Lol literally what I am or look like have nothing to do with what I like to eat or jerk off and cum the hardest to

Do you cum harder if a guy is 6'2"? How can you notice 2 inches of difference on-screen? Is it something you have to be aware of or do you just cum really hard over a video and say "damn, that guy must be 6'2"

 

[Sharkvelvet1]

Do you cum harder if a guy is 6'2"? How can you notice 2 inches of difference on-screen? Is it something you have to be aware of or do you just cum really hard over a video and say "damn, that guy must be 6'2"

IM DEAD

 

[829201]

His OF is on sale for $5 and I still won't join it because he uses DRM. Sorry, Nick! NO DEAL.

 

[Goldigger]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Brian74]

It’s like asking someone who loves eating spinach “are you a rabbit?” Lol literally what I am or look like have nothing to do with what I like to eat or jerk off and cum the hardest to

He’s only like 6 feet right? I just think no matter how muscly and good looking a guys is, if they’re not at least 6’2 - 6’3, he’s just not a ten for ME.

I repeat, for ME.

It’s always a bit disingenuous to me when someone makes an outlandishly reductive statement about an entire group of people, gets taken to task for it and then wants to feign ignorance. But I’m bored so I’ll play a little.

You say your original statement lacked context so let’s add some.

You wrote that a man under a certain height cannot be a perfect 10. Here’s what I and I believe most other posters read:

‘More than half the men on this planet could never be perfect in my eyes because of a random physical trait. And it is that one physical trait that would supersede all other desirable qualities this person may possess and therefore they will always have a (slight) physical flaw. I could come across a man who has every conceivable attractive quality that I seek in a mate, but If he doesn’t posses this ONE trait, he absolutely cannot be prefect…’


I’m sorry but that is an incredibly shallow and some might say prejudicial way of thinking.

No one condemns you for having a preference, we all do.

I happen to prefer older, beefier, hairy men myself. But that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate the beauty/sexiness/appeal of young, toned, hairless men, either.

I also don’t go around posting things like:

“So-and-so is absolutely perfect in every way, but he’s a smooth twunk and and a hairless guy could never be perfect for me. I repeat for ME .”

You’re entitled to your preference. But when you begin using that preference as a means of contending that others are less than - it seems arbitrary and wrong.

Least to me it does.

 

[geniusguy]

His OF is on sale for $5 and I still won't join it because he uses DRM. Sorry, Nick! NO DEAL.

Does the full video in ppv?

 

[croatia14]

Does the full video in ppv?

All of his videos were PPV when I was subscribed.

 

[deleted13779311]

Nobody is perfect anyway, literally nobody. Just say you have a height fetish and keep it moving honestly.

 

[CakeHungry]

It’s always a bit disingenuous to me when someone makes an outlandishly reductive statement about an entire group of people, gets taken to task for it and then wants to feign ignorance. But I’m bored so I’ll play a little.

You say your original statement lacked context so let’s add some.

You wrote that a man under a certain height cannot be a perfect 10. Here’s what I and I believe most other posters read:

‘More than half the men on this planet could never be perfect in my eyes because of a random physical trait. And it is that one physical trait that would supersede all other desirable qualities this person may possess and therefore they will always have a (slight) physical flaw. I could come across a man who has every conceivable attractive quality that I seek in a mate, but If he doesn’t posses this ONE trait, he absolutely cannot be prefect…’


I’m sorry but that is an incredibly shallow and some might say prejudicial way of thinking.

No one condemns you for having a preference, we all do.

I happen to prefer older, beefier, hairy men myself. But that doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate the beauty/sexiness/appeal of young, toned, hairless men, either.

I also don’t go around posting things like:

“So-and-so is absolutely perfect in every way, but he’s a smooth twunk and and a hairless guy could never be perfect for me. I repeat for ME .”

You’re entitled to your preference. But when you begin using that preference as a means of contending that others are less than - it seems arbitrary and wrong.

Least to me it does.

shallow is the most perfect word to describe the person that said that and even most gays in general. SHALLOW

 

[helenhunt]

sometimes the big bottom girlies need a 6'2+ dude to throw them around and make them feel like a lady

 

[nhk11]

how did his real name get leaked?