Nick toteda and Anthony cushion
- Thread starter Elishabae
- Start date
I suspect more and more people are asking for and getting refunds. Probably there attempt to emotionally blackmail people into not asking for refunds going forward
Since you can be retaliated against (banned) for getting a refund, OF should not provide the name of the person getting one to the creator.
I'm shocked! /s
This is OF's M.O. They could care less about paying customers. All they care about is keeping creators away from their competitors so they can continue to rake in the cash, regardless of how scammy they are. They love the scammers.
Such a scummy company. I wish the legit creators would leave to somewhere more ethical, like Fansly.
ChrisD24
Superior Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Posts
- 607
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 5,756
- Points
- 423
- Location
- Buenos Aires (Argentina)
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
OnlyFans won't do anything until a bunch of people get together and file a class action lawsuit against them.
After all, that's what they demand from creators in their own terms of service:
![1.png]( "1.png")
A lawsuit is unlikely to succeed (Section 230), but the bad publicity might push OnlyFans to actually DO something to make sure their creators don't resort to false advertizing to sell content.
After all, that's what they demand from creators in their own terms of service:
A lawsuit is unlikely to succeed (Section 230), but the bad publicity might push OnlyFans to actually DO something to make sure their creators don't resort to false advertizing to sell content.
What "third party goods or services" are they falsely advertising though? They're false advertising of their nudity wouldn't be covered under this.
yeah i don't think that's the relevant part of the terms of service. section 18 refers to content that advertises other third-party content (including tobacco products, gambling, alcohol, and things like underwear or sex toys sold via onlyfans posts, which are from a company or person other than the Creator themself).
but if you look at section 8 (under "Content - General Terms") it does say:
8.b. "You [the Creator] are legally responsible for all Content you Upload. [...] and you will be legally responsible for ensuring that all Content posted and all use of your account complies with the Terms of Service.
[...]
8.c. [The Creator warrants that the Content is:] [...]
- (iv.3): "as described by you."
8.d. [Indemnification Clause] "You are liable to and will indemnify us if any warranty in this section of these Terms of Use is untrue. This means you will be responsible for any resulting loss or damage we suffer."
8.e. [Disclaimer of Responsibility] "We are not responsible for, do not control, and do not endorse any Content you or any other OnlyFans User posts. We have no direct control over what your Content may comprise and are not obligated to pre-screen Content."
and:
9.a. [No Party to Contract]: "...we are not a party to the Contract between Fan and Creator or any other contract between a User and a Creator, and we are not responsible for Creator Interactions."
and then:
14.b.iii. "We may suspend or withhold earnings if "we suspect that all or any part of the Creator Earnings result from unlawful or fraudulent activity, either by you or by the Fan..."
[...]
14.f. "We may use any part of your Creator Earnings to set off any harm or loss we suffer as a result of your breach(es) of the Terms of Service."
so, tldr:
the platform's ToS make the creator (not onlyfans) legally responsible for fraudulent descriptions. so they likely couldn't be successfully sued for this. they even require the creator to pay for any legal fees or loss resulting from fraud, and threaten to withhold earnings.
you would probably have to try to sue the creators themselves, which could get complicated quickly. and users are disincentivized from this because of the nature of the content.
also, onlyfans is disincentivized from taking action against creators' fraud because they directly financially benefit from it, while not being legally liable.
that said, it's probably still possible to try to sue onlyfans for this. other types of platforms that allow you to buy from third-party sellers (people who aren't you or the platform itself) like Ebay, Etsy, Amazon are sued all the time for this kind of stuff (especially if they're involved with shipping etc.), but they can generally rely on content immunity laws (like section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in the US) or can claim non-liability because, as here, they explicitly place the liability on the creators. there is some increasing wiggle room in the UK (where onlyfans is headquartered, although i think jurisdiction would depend on both the creator and buyer's location) under the Online Safety Act 2023, which creates a legal "duty of care" requiring platforms to protect users from illegal or harmful content, so they could in theory be fined by Ofcom. but i think you'd have to prove that they're intentionally benefitting from fraud on the platform which they have specific knowledge of, which would be hard to do especially when there's more serious stuff to worry about (sex trafficking, illegal content etc.). it's kinda like trying to sue meta because a painting you bought off facebook marketplace is a forgery.
if you buy this type of content on onlyfans it's basically at your own risk.
Lawsuits aside, the best people can do is ensure others wake up to the fraud and hope that as people hear about the scammers as possible. I’m sure there will be dozens of horny men who gave them money in good faith and are too embarrassed to do anything about it. At least having a safe space like here can potentially help warn others from making the same mistake.
Ideally the negative publicity would reach any brands that have deals with them, as they wouldn’t want to be associated with this sort of conduct. That would force them to revisit their strategies.
Ideally the negative publicity would reach any brands that have deals with them, as they wouldn’t want to be associated with this sort of conduct. That would force them to revisit their strategies.
As long as everyone refunds if they’ve delivered something not as promised, they will eventually crack and post real nudes. I don’t think these two have a job, every new business venture feels like a scam or a short lived cash grab… when you have 0 other skills, there’s only so much you can do!
r0ll0ut
Cherished Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2018
- Posts
- 79
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 287
- Points
- 88
- Location
- London (Greater London, England)
- Sexuality
- Unsure
Or if only people would just stop buying their nonsense!
They have 3 income models:
Primary: Onlyfans
Secondary: Ad Sponsorships
Primary: Onlyfans
Secondary: Ad Sponsorships
- There has been less of these recently, but they could be earning a few grand a pop considering their following.
- This has considerably dropped as their old videos don't get as many views... And their latest vids are.. crap
Daydreambelief
Expert Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Posts
- 52
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 148
- Points
- 43
- Location
- Southampton, England,United Kingdom
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
Honestly, I really don't think there will be better content even if OF stopped bringing in income. Quite clearly, they have money to have renovated the house in London that they did, and they aren't exactly scrimping and saving. They also mentioned that they have a videographer that they employ and were doing up a room in their house for them. They are constantly at red carpet events most weeks along with premieres of new movies etc. They do interviews for the NTA's, no idea who exactly it is employing them for that. Plus they just spent 2 weeks in the US, and did some kind of talk, so at least part of that trip would have been funded by someone. They also have a large following on TikTok (I don't use it so only going by screenshots shared on Insta of follower count) so may have income from there too.
Wouldn’t count on it at all. Very much doubt that of is even their primary income nowadays. The house alone if they decide to sell is prob worth over a million and to be fair they don’t seem to be struggling in life.
Hmm, I wouldn't be too sure. From what I'm aware, Nick's parents have a significant stake in the house in London due to their investment. Also, if Nick's/Ant's company goes down the gutter or has issues, they've got to repay over £300k. It wouldn't surprise me if their OF is still their primary income, and it wouldn't surprise me if there's still not hundreds of people that pay for their ridiculous PPV prices.
No matter how "exposing" this thread becomes, their social media growth will always find someone new to pander to their OF, and therefore the scam continues
This is their latest 'offer'
![Untitled-2.jpg]( "Untitled-2.jpg")
Don't know about the rest of you, but I ain't holding my breath!
Similar threads
