Nick_pulos

Both full vids have been out and both show hard penetration. Surprise surprise that guy complaining is another new account that comments only on Nicks thread but hasn’t even read it. Smdh

no, full movies still haven't been released ... he only released a few seconds previews
 
  • Like
Reactions: deleted10034131
It doesn’t matter. It’s his OF and it’s his to do what he wants.
Duh. Nobody's saying he can't.

< Hasn’t there been several arguments on this thread about it being Nicks body and he can do with it what he wants and it’s not up to anyone to expect or demand anything from him? >


Who's demanding anything? I simply opined that if he introduces nude women to his overwhelmingly gay audience, he's gonna scare away some gay fans. Simple physics. It's inevitable. Most gay men I know are not only not interested in seeing naked females but are somewhat repulsed by it, to varying degrees. Not saying that's good or noble or bad, it's just a fact. If gay fans perusing his OF see nude women, I would humbly suggest that that's going to be a turn-off.

Most of us know Nick is married and [probably] mostly straight, and we wish him and his wife all the best. I know I do. But let's face it -- we gays are getting our rocks off watching him because we're fantasizing, imagining he were with us. It's all about fantasy, after all. We aren't particularly interested in seeing naked women.

< Everyone rushes to say he is bisexual, why shouldn’t he display all facets of his sexuality? If you aren’t turned off by him being married and having primarily hetero sex then he should film it and sell it. >

By all means. But if he wants to keep all the gay fans he currently has, I would gently suggest that he consider putting his straight or bi sex on a separate channel/page. That's all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Out
Both full vids have been out and both show hard penetration. Surprise surprise that guy complaining is another new account that comments only on Nicks thread but hasn’t even read it. Smdh
It was a question. You really took that shit to the heart ? Nick doesn't fucking know you so what do you truly gain from being condescending on penis forum?
 
Duh. Nobody's saying he can't.

< Hasn’t there been several arguments on this thread about it being Nicks body and he can do with it what he wants and it’s not up to anyone to expect or demand anything from him? >


Who's demanding anything? I simply opined that if he introduces nude women to his overwhelmingly gay audience, he's gonna scare away some gay fans. Simple physics. It's inevitable. Most gay men I know are not only not interested in seeing naked females but are somewhat repulsed by it, to varying degrees. Not saying that's good or noble or bad, it's just a fact. If gay fans perusing his OF see nude women, I would humbly suggest that that's going to be a turn-off.

Most of us know Nick is married and [probably] mostly straight, and we wish him and his wife all the best. I know I do. But let's face it -- we gays are getting our rocks off watching him because we're fantasizing, imagining he were with us. It's all about fantasy, after all. We aren't particularly interested in seeing naked women.

< Everyone rushes to say he is bisexual, why shouldn’t he display all facets of his sexuality? If you aren’t turned off by him being married and having primarily hetero sex then he should film it and sell it. >

By all means. But if he wants to keep all the gay fans he currently has, I would gently suggest that he consider putting his straight or bi sex on a separate channel/page. That's all.
Physics has nothing to do with this…nothing. He’s a man who says he’s bisexual, he’s married and has an OF. His OF sells PPV videos, so anything he wants to sell won’t be sent to everyone and a 5 second clip isn’t going to drive many away. There are also women who follow him who I’m sure would like to see him put all of his exploits on film for them to get off too.
As for gay men finding women’s bodies repulsive is misogynistic and it’s a real problem in the gay community. We were all born of women and to find my mother, sister, nieces repulsive is not something I could ever imagine doing. Finding women beautiful is not sexual, just as a man finding another man beautiful/ handsome is sexual.
There is also a matter of the most successful OF’s according to LPSG are run by straight men. Men who don’t have hardcore sex with men, but do with women. Nick Sandell, Rhys Sachett, Lucas Frost, Jayden Marcus, Alfiecinematic, etc. The list goes on and on. So I’m sure if he can put out mediocre gay sex scenes, then hopefully his straight scenes will be 10x times hotter. That what people want to see, Nick having hot mind blowing sex in all his bisexual glory.
 
Physics has nothing to do with this…nothing. He’s a man who says he’s bisexual, he’s married and has an OF. His OF sells PPV videos, so anything he wants to sell won’t be sent to everyone and a 5 second clip isn’t going to drive many away. There are also women who follow him who I’m sure would like to see him put all of his exploits on film for them to get off too.
As for gay men finding women’s bodies repulsive is misogynistic and it’s a real problem in the gay community. We were all born of women and to find my mother, sister, nieces repulsive is not something I could ever imagine doing. Finding women beautiful is not sexual, just as a man finding another man beautiful/ handsome is sexual.
There is also a matter of the most successful OF’s according to LPSG are run by straight men. Men who don’t have hardcore sex with men, but do with women. Nick Sandell, Rhys Sachett, Lucas Frost, Jayden Marcus, Alfiecinematic, etc. The list goes on and on. So I’m sure if he can put out mediocre gay sex scenes, then hopefully his straight scenes will be 10x times hotter. That what people want to see, Nick having hot mind blowing sex in all his bisexual glory.
Amen.
 
Of course most of us love our mothers and may even consider them beautiful, but we do NOT like to imagine them having sex with our dads. Ask anyone. Perhaps some do, but we're talking about the vast majority of us.

Most of Nick's fans are gay. That's been stated, assumed and agreed to in this forum multiple times. Most registered themselves here as "100% gay" or "99% gay," etc. As I plainly said, those who consider themselves fully gay are NOT attracted to females physically and, rightly or wrongly, are often (if not usually) at least moderately repulsed by the sight of naked women. It's a turn-off. Ain't sayin' that's not mysogynistic, it's just a fact. Some gays perusing Nick's OF and seeing women here and there -- perhaps even most gays -- are going to be turned off and less likely to want to check his site. As I said, simple physics. Nick would lose some gay fans. How many, what percent, I have no idea. But adding females to the mix is a business decision I'm sure he's considering carefully.

< hopefully his straight scenes will be 10x times hotter. >

They might well be -- to that audience. But that's not the overwhelming audience he has.
 
Of course most of us love our mothers and may even consider them beautiful, but we do NOT like to imagine them having sex with our dads. Ask anyone. Perhaps some do, but we're talking about the vast majority of us.

Most of Nick's fans are gay. That's been stated, assumed and agreed to in this forum multiple times. Most registered themselves here as "100% gay" or "99% gay," etc. As I plainly said, those who consider themselves fully gay are NOT attracted to females physically and, rightly or wrongly, are often (if not usually) at least moderately repulsed by the sight of naked women. It's a turn-off. Ain't sayin' that's not mysogynistic, it's just a fact. Some gays perusing Nick's OF and seeing women here and there -- perhaps even most gays -- are going to be turned off and less likely to want to check his site. As I said, simple physics. Nick would lose some gay fans. How many, what percent, I have no idea. But adding females to the mix is a business decision I'm sure he's considering carefully.

< hopefully his straight scenes will be 10x times hotter. >

They might well be -- to that audience. But that's not the overwhelming audience he has.
You are assuming things you have no tangible evidence of about his base. You know about this site and this thread. You don’t have a membership and are not paying for his content so, in the big picture is your advice worth taking ? Again, he sends out PPV and people can chose what they want and don’t want to see. Looking at companies like Corbin Fisher, incorporating women in scenes didn’t hurt them or their longevity. Since, o clearly, decided to ignore the OF creators I mentioned that have a large gay following while doing nothing more then just having a guy rim them and have filmed mostly solo’s or content with women your argument really doesn’t make sense.

Lastly, no one thinks of their mothers when seeing a nude woman on screen in a movie and if they do they have a lot more issues then being misogynistic. The body male or female is a beautiful construct and being repulsed says a lot more about you and your issues then someone expressing and exploring their sexuality.
 
Hotguysfuck is a site where men have sex with women that has a predominantly gay fanbase. There’s definitely a market for that type of content. Considering my own taste, I’m exclusively attracted to men but enjoy watching straight men in their natural element. And I’m not alone in that.
Ditto. From time to time I watch my favorite straight porn actors and I get hot even without hoping that they perform any homosexual activity. I prefer Manuel Ferrara over any pretty face at HGF tho. LOL. Manuel isn't even trying to impress my skinny gay ass but he makes me so wet LOL.
 
You are assuming things you have no tangible evidence of about his base. You know about this site and this thread. You don’t have a membership and are not paying for his content so, in the big picture is your advice worth taking ? Again, he sends out PPV and people can chose what they want and don’t want to see. Looking at companies like Corbin Fisher, incorporating women in scenes didn’t hurt them or their longevity. Since, o clearly, decided to ignore the OF creators I mentioned that have a large gay following while doing nothing more then just having a guy rim them and have filmed mostly solo’s or content with women your argument really doesn’t make sense.

Lastly, no one thinks of their mothers when seeing a nude woman on screen in a movie and if they do they have a lot more issues then being misogynistic. The body male or female is a beautiful construct and being repulsed says a lot more about you and your issues then someone expressing and exploring their sexuality.

We seem to be talking past each other. You're not getting what I'm saying: Nick's overwhelming audience is gay. Just look at who's registered in this forum. Further, the vast majority of those who profess to be gay are not attracted or excited by seeing females having sex. I never said ALL gays are repulsed by naked women, but a whole lot of them are. For many it's simply a turn-off, NOT their cup of tea. You admitted yourself that "this is a real problem in the gay community." I'm simply saying that adding females to Nick's stable of collabs may be risky for him, business-wise. Some fans may delight in seeing him with women, but my money is on a whole lot more being turned off and walking away. I may be wrong, but if I am, it would contradict studies where gay males have expressed their honest opinions on this.

< You don’t have a membership and are not paying for his content so, in the big picture is your advice worth taking ? >

That's rich. You have no idea whether I presently have a subscription, and besides, many here have openly stated that they drop their subs for several months and wait a while for content to build up before resubbing briefly, only to drop the subscription again. And whether people are subscribed or not does not in any way disqualify them from making rational, reasonable observations about Nick's content which can be found on numerous other sites, Twitter, etc. Because I don't have a uterus doesn't mean that, as a human, I can't have an opinion about third-trimester abortion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Out
We seem to be talking past each other. You're not getting what I'm saying: Nick's overwhelming audience is gay. Just look at who's registered in this forum. Further, the vast majority of those who profess to be gay are not attracted or excited by seeing females having sex. I never said ALL gays are repulsed by naked women, but a whole lot of them are. For many it's simply a turn-off, NOT their cup of tea. You admitted yourself that "this is a real problem in the gay community." I'm simply saying that adding females to Nick's stable of collabs may be risky for him, business-wise. Some fans may delight in seeing him with women, but my money is on a whole lot more being turned off and walking away. I may be wrong, but if I am, it would contradict studies where gay males have expressed their honest opinions on this.

< You don’t have a membership and are not paying for his content so, in the big picture is your advice worth taking ? >

That's rich. You have no idea whether I presently have a subscription, and besides, many here have openly stated that they drop their subs for several months and wait a while for content to build up before resubbing briefly, only to drop the subscription again. And whether people are subscribed or not does not in any way disqualify them from making rational, reasonable observations about Nick's content which can be found on numerous other sites, Twitter, etc. Because I don't have a uterus doesn't mean that, as a human, I can't have an opinion about third-trimester abortion.
I agree with everything you said. I’m a member of Nick’s only fans page. As some others. I don’t want to see sex with women does anyone else feel these guys are taking advantage of the gay community if they act one way on camera yet are really inyowomen?
 
Not
I agree with everything you said. I’m a member of Nick’s only fans page. As some others. I don’t want to see sex with women does anyone else feel these guys are taking advantage of the gay community if they act one way on camera yet are really inyowomen?
Not when he says he’s bi. Should he suppress his desires for one just for the gay community? I think he’s done a pretty good job at delivering on a lot of stuff haters said he would never do. If you don’t like girl stuff then just look at the guy stuff... Why so difficult? Many people don’t care who he fucks me included.
 
Thank
Not

Not when he says he’s bi. Should he suppress his desires for one just for the gay community? I think he’s done a pretty good job at delivering on a lot of stuff haters said he would never do. If you don’t like girl stuff then just look at the guy stuff... Why so difficult? Many people don’t care who he fucks me included.
thank you for your comment
 
We seem to be talking past each other. You're not getting what I'm saying: Nick's overwhelming audience is gay. Just look at who's registered in this forum. Further, the vast majority of those who profess to be gay are not attracted or excited by seeing females having sex. I never said ALL gays are repulsed by naked women, but a whole lot of them are. For many it's simply a turn-off, NOT their cup of tea. You admitted yourself that "this is a real problem in the gay community." I'm simply saying that adding females to Nick's stable of collabs may be risky for him, business-wise. Some fans may delight in seeing him with women, but my money is on a whole lot more being turned off and walking away. I may be wrong, but if I am, it would contradict studies where gay males have expressed their honest opinions on this.

< You don’t have a membership and are not paying for his content so, in the big picture is your advice worth taking ? >

That's rich. You have no idea whether I presently have a subscription, and besides, many here have openly stated that they drop their subs for several months and wait a while for content to build up before resubbing briefly, only to drop the subscription again. And whether people are subscribed or not does not in any way disqualify them from making rational, reasonable observations about Nick's content which can be found on numerous other sites, Twitter, etc. Because I don't have a uterus doesn't mean that, as a human, I can't have an opinion about third-trimester abortion.
Oh lord, being not attracted to women does not equal being repulsed by them. It just means that it doesn’t arouse anything sexual to the person observing. Repulsion is a whole other level. It’s disgust, disdain and evokes a negative reaction. Most people who are not into a scene partner, but like the star will focus on the star. It’s not hard to comprehend or understand. However, going to the lengths you’ve gone to describing how much you don’t want Nick to make and sale scenes with women says a lot.
Now, you have stated in multiple posts that you cannot subscribe to Nick’s OF or any OF because your computer is not capable of handling the bandwidth it takes to view the site. Throwing out this argument of my not knowing about your subscription habits is just sad. Enjoy the rest of your holiday weekend and take care.