We seem to be talking past each other. You're not getting what I'm saying: Nick's overwhelming audience is gay. Just look at who's registered in this forum. Further, the vast majority of those who profess to be gay are not attracted or excited by seeing females having sex. I never said ALL gays are repulsed by naked women, but a whole lot of them are. For many it's simply a turn-off, NOT their cup of tea. You admitted yourself that "this is a real problem in the gay community." I'm simply saying that adding females to Nick's stable of collabs may be risky for him, business-wise. Some fans may delight in seeing him with women, but my money is on a whole lot more being turned off and walking away. I may be wrong, but if I am, it would contradict studies where gay males have expressed their honest opinions on this.
< You don’t have a membership and are not paying for his content so, in the big picture is your advice worth taking ? >
That's rich. You have no idea whether I presently have a subscription, and besides, many here have openly stated that they drop their subs for several months and wait a while for content to build up before resubbing briefly, only to drop the subscription again. And whether people are subscribed or not does not in any way disqualify them from making rational, reasonable observations about Nick's content which can be found on numerous other sites, Twitter, etc. Because I don't have a uterus doesn't mean that, as a human, I can't have an opinion about third-trimester abortion.