OK, one last time: Not saying he shouldn’t collab with women. I said that if he mixes such female sexual material with the content his largely gay fans are scrolling though, it will be a turn-off for a lot them. I suggested that he might want to consider separating his straight content from his overwhelmingly gay audience so that they don’t have to stumble over naked girls when checking his OF. Once again, seeing naked ladies' private parts is decidedly not most gays’ cup of tea. Scares customers away.
Sure, there are anecdotal examples of some who say they’re 100% gay and still find straight sex to be “hot,” as someone commented. They’re the rarity, not the rule.
You going to the lengths you have to deny reality is interesting. Apparently you just love to argue. Let’s review: Nick asked what his fans think of bringing females into the mix. Since this is exactly the appropriate forum to discuss this, I commented that I think this may be a risky business move as the vast majority of his fans are gay (does anyone deny this?) and that it might make good business sense to offer his female imagery separately. Gays can choose to go there if desired, but naked women won’t be in their faces when looking for content. Simple suggestion.
The word "repulsion" seems to run deep with you. As I've said repeatedly, for most gays, seeing female sex is a turn-off. Sorry, but yes, “turn-off” means a degree of repulsion/revulsion. The salient fact is that the very sight of a vagina makes most gays go limp. Viewing sexual imagery and getting one’s rocks off is all mental. It’s all about fantasy, imagination…“going there” in our minds. The last thing we want is to have that exciting ride derailed by something that turns us off. Sounds horribly misogynistic, but human nature is human nature. The last thing most lesbians want to see is a dude’s cock -- or even an invitation to see one. It is what it is.
< Now, you have stated in multiple posts that you cannot subscribe to Nick’s OF or any OF because your computer is not capable of handling the bandwidth it takes to view the site. Throwing out this argument of my not knowing about your subscription habits is just sad. >
My mentioning my computer issues was months ago. You have no idea if they have been solved. Throwing out the mean-spirited strawman argument that I have no right to express an opinion on Nick’s content because you thought I wasn’t a subscriber is what’s sad. From some of the inane, ignorant comments in this forum I’ll wager I have followed Nick far more closely than most.
This debate is getting ridiculous, tiresome and very repetitive. Let’s let it go, agree to disagree, and move on.
