Personal trainer?

First off, your grammar is atrocious.
But, moving on.....
No clue why you would assume pointing out your ignorance is "roid rage".
As for diet....double??? Not likely. They can eat a fair amount...but the macros are much different. Also, if you are actually trying to convince anybody rational that a 110 lb runner can eat more than a 250 lb bodybuilder, you should seek medical attention....because you've clearly bumped your head.
Next,...I'm not trying to impress anybody. I'm very happily attached. Thanks, anyway.
*gasp* oh no! I'm "incivil"! Not THAT!!! What will I do??
Eh....on second thought, I don't give a fuck.
Idiot
 
Those people don't just lift weights, are you catching my drift here? And I have trained with weights for over 30 yers and still do. It makes me laugh peopl ewho believe that lifting weights is theoretic physics.



Do you realize that I am thousands of miles far away from her? You are not. Maybe it's you that want to sniff her panties.
I'm straight, engaged, and passionate about helping people improve their lives like I have. Simple as that... And for that very reason Taraai, I'll message you with the rest. Just be careful who's advice you take on a site full of horny, hormonal, fapping men.


Also, theoretic physics? The fuck are you even talking about?
 
First off, your grammar is atrocious.
...
I am typing from a phone and I am not ENS. Actually it seems I speak your native language better than you do and I don't need to resolve to insults like you have to.

....
No clue why you would assume pointing out your ignorance is "roid rage".
....
I know, you have issue understanding things. I'll explain in more simple terms: calling somebody who disagrees with you "idiot" is not civil behavior and is probably consequence of steroid abuse; actually I hope for you that it is a consequence of steroids abuse, because in this case you have a hope to become more civil when you stop abusing steroids.

Is that clear enough for you?

....
Eh....on second thought, I don't give a fuck.
Idiot
quod erat demonstrandum[/QUOTE]
 
First off, your grammar is atrocious.
...
I am typing from a phone and I am not ENS. Actually it seems I speak your native language better than you do and I don't need to resolve to insults like you have to.

....
No clue why you would assume pointing out your ignorance is "roid rage".
....
I know, you have issue understanding things. I'll explain in more simple terms: calling somebody who disagrees with you "idiot" is not civil behavior and is probably consequence of steroid abuse; actually I hope for you that it is a consequence of steroids abuse, because in this case you have a hope to become more civil when you stop abusing steroids.

Is that clear enough for you?

....
Eh....on second thought, I don't give a fuck.
Idiot
quod erat demonstrandum
 
I'm straight, engaged, and passionate about helping people improve their lives like I have. Simple as that... And for that very reason Taraai, I'll message you with the rest. Just be careful who's advice you take on a site full of horny, hormonal, fapping men.


Also, theoretic physics? The fuck are you even talking about?

It is a good thing that you want to help others. Until proven adversely, all the people giving advice here want to help, agree? So it would be a good idea avoiding to become personal and be less intolerant of other' people points of view. It's not hat I have insulted your dad right? I am speaking out of my personal experience and trust me, I have read about evertything about training and nutrition, and come to realize that it was a waste of time because it is all pseudoscience, occult advertising and brainwashing.

If you lift weigths, your body will do everything to relief the stress, storing more fat and water included. If you lift your body, storing more water and fat will not be functional and your body will react putting on more lean mass. Thats' what makes sense and that's what I have seen hundreds of times happening in people who train. It's not what you'll find written in Weider' magazines of course. Right or wrong, it is my educated opinion and personal remarks will not help making your point.

Peace and love.
 
I am typing from a phone and I am not ENS. Actually it seems I speak your native language better than you do and I don't need to resolve to insults like you have to.


I know, you have issue understanding things. I'll explain in more simple terms: calling somebody who disagrees with you "idiot" is not civil behavior and is probably consequence of steroid abuse; actually I hope for you that it is a consequence of steroids abuse, because in this case you have a hope to become more civil when you stop abusing steroids.

Is that clear enough for you?


quod erat demonstrandum
[/QUOTE]
Actually, your English is noticeably poor. Good luck trying to make an intelligent point to anybody with the way you butcher it.
You are quite possibly one of the most ignorant people I've ever had the misfortune to come across. But, that's ok. I forgive you.
Again, please get your head trauma (or possible tumor) looked at asap. We're all worried about your mental state. Or am I mistaken & it's actually mental illness? In either case, seek help.
Have a day! :)
 
Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults
Leslie H. Willis, Cris A. Slentz, Lori A. Bateman, A. Tamlyn Shields, Lucy W. Piner, Connie W. Bales, Joseph A. Houmard, William E. Kraus
Journal of Applied Physiology Published 15 December 2012 Vol. 113 no. 12, 1831-1837 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01370.2011



.....a randomized trial, compared aerobic training (T) resistance training (RT), and a combination of the two (AT/RT) to determine the optimal mode of exercise for obesity reduction. Participants were 119 sedentary, overweight or obese adults who were randomized to one of three 8-mo exercise protocols: 1) RT: resistance training, 2) AT: aerobic training, and 3) AT/RT: aerobic and resistance training (combination of AT and RT).

Primary outcomes included total body mass, fat mass, and lean body mass. ................................. While requiring double the time commitment, a program of combined AT and RT did not result in significantly more fat mass or body mass reductions over AT alone. Balancing time commitments against health benefits, it appears that AT is the optimal mode of exercise for reducing fat mass and body mass, while a program including RT is needed for increasing lean mass in middle-aged, overweight/obese individuals.
............
ARTICLES | Journal of Applied Physiology
 
Advertising is your source? Again, which is what had to be proven. And I have another old new for you: claric intake means very little:
Still Counting Calories? Your Weight-Loss Plan May Be Outdated

It’s no secret that Americans are fatter today than ever before, and not just those unlucky people who are genetically inclined to gain weight or have been overweight all their lives. Many who were lean as young adults have put on lots of unhealthy pounds as they pass into middle age and beyond.

It’s also no secret that the long-recommended advice to eat less and exercise more has done little to curb the inexorable rise in weight.....

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/health/19brody.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
 
It hurts to be proven wrong, doesn't it?

Metabolism. 1996 Feb;45(2):179-83.
Contrasting effects of resistance and aerobic training on body composition and metabolism after diet-induced weight loss.
Ballor DL1, Harvey-Berino JR, Ades PA, Cryan J, Calles-Escandon J.
Author information

............................
The effects of 12 weeks (three times per week) of either aerobic or weight training exercise on body weight, body composition, and energy metabolism during rest and following a meal in 18 older (mean +/- SE, 61 +/- 1 years; range, 56 to 70) subjects who had recently lost a mean of 9 +/- 1 kg were studied. During the exercise training period, the aerobic training group (five women, four men) had a significant (P < .05) reduction in body weight (-2.5 +/- 0.6 kg) as compared with the weight training group (five women, four men) (0.4 +/- 0.9 kg). Eight of nine aerobic training subjects lost additional weight, while six of nine weight training subjects gained weight.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Contrasting effects of resistance and aerobic training on body composition and metabolism after diet-induced weight loss. - PubMed - NCBI



Foxnews? lolol.
 
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Nov;301(5):E1033-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00291.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
Effects of aerobic vs. resistance training on visceral and liver fat stores, liver enzymes, and insulin resistance by HOMA in overweight adults from STRRIDE AT/RT.
Slentz CA1, Bateman LA, Willis LH, Shields AT, Tanner CJ, Piner LW, Hawk VH, Muehlbauer MJ, Samsa GP, Nelson RC, Huffman KM, Bales CW, Houmard JA, Kraus WE.
Author information

Abstract
While the benefits of exercise are clear, many unresolved issues surround the optimal exercise prescription. Many organizations recommend aerobic training (AT) and resistance training (RT), yet few studies have compared their effects alone or in combination. The purpose of this study, part of Studies Targeting Risk Reduction Interventions Through Defined Exercise-Aerobic Training and/or Resistance Training (STRRIDE/AT/RT), was to compare the effects of AT, RT, and the full combination (AT/RT) on central ectopic fat, liver enzymes, and fasting insulin resistance [homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)].

In a randomized trial, 249 subjects [18-70 yr old, overweight, sedentary, with moderate dyslipidemia (LDL cholesterol 130-190 mg/dl or HDL cholesterol ≤ 40 mg/dl for men or ≤ 45 mg/dl for women)] performed an initial 4-mo run-in period. Of these, 196 finished the run-in and were randomized into one of the following 8-mo exercise-training groups: 1) RT, which comprised 3 days/wk, 8 exercises, 3 sets/exercise, 8-12 repetitions/set, 2) AT, which was equivalent to ∼19.2 km/wk (12 miles/wk) at 75% peak O(2) uptake, and 3) full AT + full RT (AT/RT), with 155 subjects completing the intervention.
..........
. These data show that, for overweight and obese individuals who want to reduce measures of visceral fat and fatty liver infiltration and improve HOMA and alanine aminotransferase, a moderate amount of aerobic exercise is the most time-efficient and effective exercise mode.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Effects of aerobic vs. resistance training on visceral and liver fat stores, liver enzymes, and insulin resistance by HOMA in overweight adults fro... - PubMed - NCBI
 
The Effects of Aerobic Versus Resistance Training on Cardiovascular Fitness in Obese Sedentary Females
Sarika Chaudhary, MSPT,* Manpreet Kaur Kang, MSPT, and Jaspal Singh Sandhu, MS, FAIS, FASM

Purpose
The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of aerobic and strength training on cardiac variables such as blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and metabolic parameters like cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides and anthropometric parameters of obese women of Punjab.

Methods
This study was performed as an experimental study, in which subjects were randomly selected. There were thirty obese women, aged between 35-45yrs with body mass index (BMI) of above 30. Subjects were grouped into control (n=10), aerobic training (n=10) and resistance training (n=10). Aerobic training was given for three days a week at 60-70% of maximum HR for 6 weeks. Resistance training (Delorme and Watkins Technique) was given for alternate days for 6 weeks. HR and blood pressure were measured before and after the exercise. Recovery HR was also measured.
.....

Conclusion

Aerobic training is more beneficial and can be used as a preventive measure in patients who are at risk of developing cardiovascular diseases due to obesity.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: The Effects of Aerobic Versus Resistance Training on Cardiovascular Fitness in Obese Sedentary Females
 
The last two studies don't apply, idiot.
Also, you're confusing weight loss with fat loss.
Look, idiot, for every study you cut and paste obsessively I can show you some that contradict it.
So, instead of clogging up this girl's thread,I invite you to start another thread or pm me, so I can shred your retarded viewpoint.
Sound good, idiot?
I'll be waiting