Probably bigger than mandingo

[harryter]

Oh my god, shut the fuck up and just enjoy a huge cock for a change!

Why does every goddamn thread on this website devolve into this shit? Every time I see a new page of posts on this thread I think someone might have linked something new, but no, it's just more of you assclowns arguing as if any thing you can possibly say is going to convince the other parties when you all know full well this is the internet so everyone has preemptively decided that they are right and refuse to change their position.

Can we get a mute function, please?

I just came on here to post the exact same thing. And of course, I see it at the top of the page and hope. I keep getting excited about a new video, and it's just the same bullshit. The guy is obviously huge. The fact that he's caused this much of a stir says something in itself. The fact that his videos are clear, not some grainy webcam bullshit says something in itself too. Sucks he doesn't have any videos with a tiny skinny girl like all the other monster cock legends, but it is what it is. Just enjoy what we've seen. Bump it for video updates. Stop all the arguing. It's a freaking dick. If it was some grainy "faked" video argument, that's one thing. But this is clear as day. The guy has a massive dick. Enjoy and bump for video.

yes, I see the irony in posting without a video..... so.......... BUMP!!!

Any new videos?!?!?!?!?!

 

[Snakebyte]

This is not the full palm of the woman. 2.91" (74mm) is the average female hand breadth, and hand breadth is the distance bewteen the two outermost points of the palm, i.e. a lot more than the distance across the fingers.
My hand breadth is 91mm. If I place my hand in the exact same position on a similarly shaped graduated object, I get 74mm across my fingers (yellow line):

View attachment 495181

Distance across her fingers IRL = 74*74/91 = 60.2mm
Penis to hand ratio = 169/50 = 3.38
Penis length IRL = 60.2*3.38 = 203.5mm = 8.01"

FWIW.

Measured both three times and averaged out at a 3.1 ratio. And the distance measured is even more than the way the hand breadth is measured in scientifical studies. So 3.1 x 2.91 turns out to be slightly above 9". I got 8.6" and 8.7" when i factored in really conservative values.
Seriously I am really starting to doubt your "her hand / my hand" approach. I just can't put a finger on the flaw.

 

[sdp]

OK I get it, you used the palm which is behind the cock. I thought you knew better than that. It's meaningless, as the palm and the cock aren't on the same plane. Only thing we can use here is the fingers' width along the top, although we can't tell exactly where the fingers cross the middle of the top of the shaft (a POV shot would be better).

 

[dgyeezy]

OK I get it, you used the palm which is behind the cock. I thought you knew better than that. It's meaningless, as the palm and the cock aren't on the same plane. Only thing we can use here is the fingers' width along the top, although we can't tell exactly where the fingers cross the middle of the top of the shaft (a POV shot would be better).

Love it when you guys talk logic

 

[kod]

Just a random post of Gwen Summer with Lex Steele for your extrapolations
http://i.imgur.com/KXPpLTR.png

 

[Snakebyte]

OK I get it, you used the palm which is behind the cock. I thought you knew better than that. It's meaningless, as the palm and the cock aren't on the same plane. Only thing we can use here is the fingers' width along the top, although we can't tell exactly where the fingers cross the middle of the top of the shaft (a POV shot would be better).

Both cock and palm are in the picture plane so what the heck are you talking about. Ok, the hand may be an inch "behind" the cock and therefore have a reduced size of 99%. But seriously, that's bullshit.
Tbh I start to think that you really have an agenda downsizing pornstars like some people suggest. I just didn't wanna believe it.

 

[duckman8989]

Both cock and palm are in the picture plane so what the heck are you talking about. Ok, the hand may be an inch "behind" the cock and therefore have a reduced size of 99%. But seriously, that's bullshit.
Tbh I start to think that you really have an agenda downsizing pornstars like some people suggest. I just didn't wanna believe it.

You're an idiot. You get snippy with people and act like you know everything, and that just might work if you actually did know a damn thing.

Like sdp stated, the hand clearly isn't parallel with the camera lens (and tbh, neither is the cock, which is why it's so difficult to find actual useable photos), so what good is that analyzation anyways? Not to mention, the hand breadth is not the distance from one end of the palm to the bone like you used in that picture, it's the width of the palm from one end to the other.

Don't see how sdp has any agenda. Seems like the most unbiased and reasonable person ITT. That's not saying much, but he certainly knows more than you about this stuff. Maybe tone down the cranky attitude and take a closer look at photos before you use them for analyzation.

 

[sdp]

Like sdp stated, the hand clearly isn't parallel with the camera lens (and tbh, neither is the cock, which is why it's so difficult to find actual useable photos)

Not what I meant here. The issue is simply that the cock is closer to the camera than the palm of her hand...

Ok, the hand may be an inch "behind" the cock and therefore have a reduced size of 99%.

... and it certainly makes a lot more than a 1% difference. See this pic for example:

We know the phone is 4.78" (Galaxy S7390), so the cock must be 9.2", right? Wrong: at that erection level I'm barely 8.5". That's because the phone isn't flush with the top of the cock, almost there but not quite. I also have a slight upward curve which brings the second half of the cock even farther up from the phone.

Now let's see what happens when the phone is flush with the bottom of the cock:

We get 9.65", but at that erection level I'm only 8.25" or so...

This is why measured pics must have the ruler on top, not on the side, and why length estimations from hands are only somewhat reliable if you use a part of the hand that's on top and if you factor in the difference of depth between the hand and the cock (which is rather easily done by looking how your own hand projects on a ruler from the same estimated distance as the camera).

 

[orwamdaka]

any new videos ???

 

[DonaldHump]

You're an idiot. You get snippy with people and act like you know everything, and that just might work if you actually did know a damn thing.

Like sdp stated, the hand clearly isn't parallel with the camera lens (and tbh, neither is the cock, which is why it's so difficult to find actual useable photos), so what good is that analyzation anyways? Not to mention, the hand breadth is not the distance from one end of the palm to the bone like you used in that picture, it's the width of the palm from one end to the other.

Don't see how sdp has any agenda. Seems like the most unbiased and reasonable person ITT. That's not saying much, but he certainly knows more than you about this stuff. Maybe tone down the cranky attitude and take a closer look at photos before you use them for analyzation.

Actually both are clueless. Snakebyte cries when you tell him that the penis he is in love with isn't big as he thought. Sdp keeps using the stupid hands crap like he knows these peoples hand size. Some short people have huge hands and some tall people have small hands so Sdp has his agenda and it is to down play other guys dick size to build up his own dick. According to him he is as big as Mandingo. He also claims to be 8.5 inches but can't get a tape measure and put it next to his dick. Snakebytes agenda is to build up any guys dick he has a thing for.

 

[Giovanni]

Actually both are clueless. Snakebyte cries when you tell him that the penis he is in love with isn't big as he thought. Sdp keeps using the stupid hands crap like he knows these peoples hand size. Some short people have huge hands and some tall people have small hands so Sdp has his agenda and it is to down play other guys dick size to build up his own dick. According to him he is as big as Mandingo. He also claims to be 8.5 inches but can't get a tape measure and put it next to his dick. Snakebytes agenda is to build up any guys dick he has a thing for.

He has measured pics.

 

[sdp]

Nice bit of trolling there.

Sdp keeps using the stupid hands crap like he knows these peoples hand size.

I don't, multiple estimations with multiple girls are needed for it to be reliable, so hand sizes can average out. In this thread I used it to address the flaw in Snakebyte's method, not to give a definitive estimation.

Sdp has his agenda and it is to down play other guys dick size to build up his own dick.

Not true and you know it.

According to him he is as big as Mandingo.

I never said that.

He also claims to be 8.5 inches but can't get a tape measure and put it next to his dick.

I have a gallery with measured pics.

 

[dedovedde]

Just so you guys know, I'm done with this thread. I won't be sharing any new info/videos I can get. I'm not interested in reading people arguing about size issues and proving others they have a big cock.

 

[Snakebyte]

You're an idiot. You get snippy with people and act like you know everything, and that just might work if you actually did know a damn thing.

Like sdp stated, the hand clearly isn't parallel with the camera lens (and tbh, neither is the cock, which is why it's so difficult to find actual useable photos), so what good is that analyzation anyways? Not to mention, the hand breadth is not the distance from one end of the palm to the bone like you used in that picture, it's the width of the palm from one end to the other.

Don't see how sdp has any agenda. Seems like the most unbiased and reasonable person ITT. That's not saying much, but he certainly knows more than you about this stuff. Maybe tone down the cranky attitude and take a closer look at photos before you use them for analyzation.

Welcome back banned member #1657. Read again what I wrote before making a fool out of yourself. I never said that this was the way the hand breadth is measured, in fact this way is broader than the scientifical way to measure hand breadth. But hey, that's exactly what I wrote before. So off to the ignore list like your last accounts.

Actually both are clueless. Snakebyte cries when you tell him that the penis he is in love with isn't big as he thought. Sdp keeps using the stupid hands crap like he knows these peoples hand size. Some short people have huge hands and some tall people have small hands so Sdp has his agenda and it is to down play other guys dick size to build up his own dick. According to him he is as big as Mandingo. He also claims to be 8.5 inches but can't get a tape measure and put it next to his dick. Snakebytes agenda is to build up any guys dick he has a thing for.

If you could read at all you would know that I said he probably is between x.x and y.y. inches and never claimed anything (it even was in bold letters in that said post). But since you are just a dumb troll why do I even bother...
Neither did sdp claim to as big or bigger than anyone. Besides he has measuring pics supporting his size statements. But how should you know.. guess it's too much effort to get gold status for every new account you create, huh?

I don't, multiple estimations with multiple girls are needed for it to be reliable, so hand sizes can average out. In this thread I used it to address the flaw in Snakebyte's method, not to give a definitive estimation.

There may be flaws in my approach (I did two different approaches though using low values and yet came up with a bigger result than you did) but I am pretty much convinced that yours has a big flaw aswell. Just having a big sample size doesn't make the method reliable tbh. Now let's get real. You are right, the palm is behind the cock. Her thumb on the other hand is in front of his cock. So that distance not being in the picture plane actually would mean that the distance appears shorter than it is in reality. That actually would be a flaw decreasing the estimated size. Quite frankly, if you want me to I could calculate the shortening factor geometrically while using conservative values like 2" width of the penis. Then again the measured distance is actually more than the hand breadth which again decreases the estimated size. So all in all I am pretty much convinced I did everything to actually get a low value if possible. So after all I tried to downsize him if you will.
Unless you can point out a flaw in my first approach I am pretty much convinced that 8.5" is the minimum length. And to be honest 8.5" really is no outrageous estimation I'd say. Especially if you actually take a look at that first picture used to compare the penis to his thigh. Honestly, dou you really think that this is "only" 8"?

Ya and sry for that agenda thing. In that moment I just couldn't believe you actually really believed in the the numbers you gave.
In general it's nice talking to you.


But ima put the two trolls on ignore for good.

 

[duckman8989]

Welcome back banned member #1657. Read again what I wrote before making a fool out of yourself. I never said that this was the way the hand breadth is measured, in fact this way is broader than the scientifical way to measure hand breadth. But hey, that's exactly what I wrote before. So off to the ignore list like your last accounts.


If you could read at all you would know that I said he probably is between x.x and y.y. inches and never claimed anything (it even was in bold letters in that said post). But since you are just a dumb troll why do I even bother...
Neither did sdp claim to as big or bigger than anyone. Besides he has measuring pics supporting his size statements. But how should you know.. guess it's too much effort to get gold status for every new account you create, huh?



There may be flaws in my approach (I did two different approaches though using low values and yet came up with a bigger result than you did) but I am pretty much convinced that yours has a big flaw aswell. Just having a big sample size doesn't make the method reliable tbh). Now let's get real. You are right, the palm is behind the cock. Her thumb on the other hand is in front of his cock. So that distance not being in the picture plane actually would mean that the distance appears shorter than it is in reality. That actually would be a flaw decreasing the estimated size. Quite frankly, if you want me to I could calculate the shortening factor geometrically while using conservative values like 2" width of the penis. Then again the measured distance is actually more than the hand breadth which again decreases the estimated size. So all in all I am pretty much convinced I did everything to actually get a low value if possible. So after all I tried to downsize him if you will.
Unless you can point out a flaw in my first approach I am pretty much convinced that 8.5" is the minimum length. And to be honest 8.5" really is no outrageous estimation I'd say. Especially if you actually take a look at that first picture used to compare the penis to his thigh. Honestly, dou you really think that this is "only" 8"?

Ya and sry for that agenda thing. In that moment I just couldn't believe you actually really believed in the the numbers you gave.
In general it's nice talking to you.


But ima put the two trolls on ignore for good.

Nice one, Grumpo.

Actually, the way you used isn't broader than true hand breadth. Like I said...the hand isn't parallel to the camera. So what good is that photo anyways? Unless both cock and hand are 100% parallel then it's a meaningless estimation when your sample size is one. Even if the hand is just a little bit tilted in relation to the camera, results can be significantly skewed. The photo is practically useless on it's own in terms of estimating any accurate size, whether sdp said it or not, I'm saying it now. But you probably have your head in the sand and have put me on ignore so w/e. I hope you continue to enjoy acting like a snarky bitch with a metal pipe up his ass.

 

[Snakebyte]

View attachment 495568

We know the phone is 4.78" (Galaxy S7390), so the cock must be 9.2", right? Wrong: at that erection level I'm barely 8.5". That's because the phone isn't flush with the top of the cock, almost there but not quite. I also have a slight upward curve which brings the second half of the cock even farther up from the phone.

Yup, you're right. I came up with 9.2" on that one. So stop downsizing yourself jerk

 

[dgyeezy]

I know that this is a complete side character irrelevant to our topic between Julio gomez and mandingo but this guy is peculiar to me and I can't find a thread on him if there is one. Do you guys know who this is?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...7_cum_&usg=AFQjCNFfZlqHPWdVRXqPsM8crLh85ArdaQ

 

[checkin]

The guy is huge regardless of all the child like banter, another thread mentioned he has done gay porn. Any truth to that?

 

[dgyeezy]

I know that this is a complete side character irrelevant to our topic between Julio gomez and mandingo but this guy is peculiar to me and I can't find a thread on him if there is one. Do you guys know who this is?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiBwtyS7LnNAhVG_WMKHWBtB64QtwIIITAC&url=http://www.xvideos.com/video11740287/ken-super_big_black_cock7_cum_&usg=AFQjCNFfZlqHPWdVRXqPsM8crLh85ArdaQ

Figured it out, it's flintstone

 

[sdp]

Like I said...the hand isn't parallel to the camera. So what good is that photo anyways? Unless both cock and hand are 100% parallel then it's a meaningless estimation when your sample size is one. Even if the hand is just a little bit tilted in relation to the camera, results can be significantly skewed. The photo is practically useless on it's own in terms of estimating any accurate size, whether sdp said it or not, I'm saying it now.

Sorry, I didn't get it when you said it before, but you're absolutely right. The picture can still be used, but you'd have to either do a bit of geometry to get the right pixel count for the hand, or rotate the pic so the penis and the hand are at opposite angles. I assumed Snakebyte took the angle difference into account but he didn't.

So we actually have a ratio of not 3.1 but 2.9, which gets us 8.44" for the penis if we use the arbitrary 2.91" figure for the hand and if we don't take the depth difference into account (the two probably more or less cancelling out each other), but I'd still rather trust my estimation from the fingers width.

I am pretty much convinced that yours has a big flaw aswell. Just having a big sample size doesn't make the method reliable tbh.

Why not? It makes perfect sense. Why would the average of the hand sizes in that sample deviate from the average in the general population? An objection would be that female porn stars tend to have particularly small hands, but then I'll just end up with an over-estimation of the penis length, which is better than an under-estimation.

The only assumption I make is that all hands features are proportional to breadth from individual to individual (including from male to female), not a big deal IMO especially since my own hands look to me like they are very normally proportioned. Plus anyone can redo the math using their own hands and see if they get different results.

You are right, the palm is behind the cock. Her thumb on the other hand is in front of his cock. So that distance not being in the picture plane actually would mean that the distance appears shorter than it is in reality. That actually would be a flaw decreasing the estimated size.

You mean increasing.

Then again the measured distance is actually more than the hand breadth which again decreases the estimated size.

True.

Do you really think that this is "only" 8"?

I honestly wasn't expecting to get only 8".