Quality Over Quantity.

[Tight_N_Juicy]

Fine with me but you've never stopped arguing about it here and never will, will you?

Awaiting your boast about the righteousness of your opinions.

My opinion isn't "right" but I feel compelled to share it when a bunch of penis having motherfuckers keep trying to speak on my behalf in overly generalizing posts.

I'm not trying to say every single woman alive is the same as me, and I'm not trying to say that your experiences are invalid. They apply to You and Your life. Not the entire human population. Same goes for my experiences.

Until there's credible scientific FACT on the matter, I'd say everyone needs to just calm the fuck down. Myself included? Yeah. I've admitted that I get too hostile here. I'm trying to do better.

 

[halcyondays]

This and your last post to @Tight_N_Juicy feel an awful lot like you're just trying to poke them with a pointy stick.

Indeed! My pointy stick was in response to hers.

My experience is based on the 400+ women with whom I've had sex plus sexual verbal/social interactions with hundreds more.

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

Indeed! My pointy stick was in response to hers.

@Tight_N_Juicy admitted on page 1 that she should have rephrased her initial post. She further extended an olive branch in post #53 regarding the lack of clear evidence of preferences. Seems to be no pointy stick there. What's the issue that makes you continue to stir this pot?

My experience is based on the 400+ women with whom I've had sex plus sexual verbal/social interactions with hundreds more.

So you stated that you assumed your experience was similar to @Fade and she clarified hers with a general number, to which you respond that lacking scientific study, any personal claim of numbers is anecdote. Yet now you feel compelled to provide a number as well. Is your anecdote more worthy than Fade's?

 

[693987]

@Tight_N_Juicy admitted on page 1 that she should have rephrased her initial post. She further extended an olive branch in post #53 regarding the lack of clear evidence of preferences. Seems to be no pointy stick there. What's the issue that makes you continue to stir this pot?




So you stated that you assumed your experience was similar to @Fade and she clarified hers with a general number, to which you respond that lacking scientific study, any personal claim of numbers is anecdote. Yet now you feel compelled to provide a number as well. Is your anecdote more worthy than Fade's?

Meh. Typical. Notice how he asked for my quantity first, so that he can try to give a similar or maybe bigger number.

 

[Auggiecakes]

I’ve had my fair share of one night stands. Still had no clue what size penis I was getting before the clothes came off. I sure the hell didn’t pass around men my friends were sleeping with. And we never talked about size anyway.

I still think guys hear what we women are feeding them, and in a lot of cases it’s fellating the ego. But whatever.

I used to buy discount but now I only buy couture

 

[halcyondays]

So you stated that you assumed your experience was similar to @Fade and she clarified hers with a general number, to which you respond that lacking scientific study, any personal claim of numbers is anecdote. Yet now you feel compelled to provide a number as well. Is your anecdote more worthy than Fade's?

No. It's the same.

@Tight_N_Juicy admitted on page 1 that she should have rephrased her initial post. She further extended an olive branch in post #53 regarding the lack of clear evidence of preferences. Seems to be no pointy stick there. What's the issue that makes you continue to stir this pot?

Because she replied in anger in post 53:

How about we agree to the fact that there are women who enjoy big dick, and that there are plenty of you who couldn't give a shit less how big or small the organ dangling in front in your asshole is?

Her way of calling me an asshole and expressing contempt for the male member. Except for her contempt it was almost a gracious response to which I agree: there are no studies telling us what percentage of the female population prefers or would prefer a large male member. In my experience it's a lot.

Me stir the pot? Have you read her post history? She's one of the most argumentative members here.

For the record you, TNJ and Fade are on my ignore list but I do check their replies from time to time outside the Women's forums. I caught TNJ making a generalization here in support of her opinion and pointed it out. I would not call that a "pointed stick" or "stirring the pot" when she has expressed such contempt for generalizations.

 

[Tight_N_Juicy]

Me stir the pot? Have you read her post history? She's one of the most argumentative members here.
I caught TNJ making a generalization here in support of her opinion and pointed it out. I would not call that a "pointed stick" or "stirring the pot" when she has expressed such contempt for generalizations.

LMFAO
Whatever dude.

You "caught" me? I admitted that I phrased that post poorly.

I apologize when I'm being too aggressive. I own it when I'm wrong.

I'm on your ignore list. Want a fucking cookie?

 

[seventiesdemon]

This whole "You have a huge cock, you must be so blessed and happy"

Sorry dude, we don't get all the booty we want. Women who love big cock are few and far between (and are usually more cautious because of guys hitting on them, pretending to have big sticks)

>.<

In my time on the planet....Quantity always gives way to quality. Then again there is Quality combined with Quantity......Q+Q= Q

=

 

[ItsAll4Kim]

No. It's the same.



Because she replied in anger in post 53:



Her way of calling me an asshole and expressing contempt for the male member. Except for her contempt it was almost a gracious response to which I agree: there are no studies telling us what percentage of the female population prefers or would prefer a large male member. In my experience it's a lot.

Me stir the pot? Have you read her post history? She's one of the most argumentative members here.

For the record you, TNJ and Fade are on my ignore list but I do check their replies from time to time outside the Women's forums. I caught TNJ making a generalization here in support of her opinion and pointed it out. I would not call that a "pointed stick" or "stirring the pot" when she has expressed such contempt for generalizations.

Awww, now that's ironic....we're "on your ignore list" but here you are responding directly to our posts. So we actually aren't. Or....you're so concerned about what is being written about you that you just can't help hitting that darned old, "show ignored content" button. Because it just sits there....judging you. Daring you to look.

And yes, YOU stirred the pot. @Tight_N_Juicy did far more than I've ever seen you do...she admitted she was wrong, and she agreed to disagree. But because she didn't display the obeisance to which you felt entitled, you just continued poking that stick. Learn to recognize and take a win. You might actually make a friend or two.

'''Tis a shame you'll never see this, me being on your ignore list and all....

 

[seventiesdemon]

I think G..O..D...put us on his, her, their ignore list. Pollute the Oceans, land, air and space.....Should never have given them free will.......Yup.....ignore the fuckers

 

[693987]

Gee, I must be special. Some random people on the internet don't like me/have me on ignore, yet feel compelled to try and throw shade on my anecdotes when all they have are... Yep! Anecdotes!

Anyway. If I had to pick quality of sex versus frequency of having it, I would be picking quality. Frequency is nice too, though. Again, dick size is not as important to most women as a lot of men want it to be, so that doesn't even factor into the equation at all for me. Also, I don't have fragile ego about penis to try to shelter when I've talked with all the women that I have about dicks. Just saying.

 

[large_treat]

In my time on the planet....Quantity always gives way to quality. Then again there is Quality combined with Quantity......Q+Q= Q

=

Ok.. a STNG reference.. You may have just won the interwebs!

 

[seventiesdemon]

Gee, I must be special. Some random people on the internet don't like me/have me on ignore, yet feel compelled to try and throw shade on my anecdotes when all they have are... Yep! Anecdotes!

Anyway. If I had to pick quality of sex versus frequency of having it, I would be picking quality. Frequency is nice too, though. Again, dick size is not as important to most women as a lot of men want it to be, so that doesn't even factor into the equation at all for me. Also, I don't have fragile ego about penis to try to shelter when I've talked with all the women that I have about dicks. Just saying.

Some view ignorance is bliss, while others view it as ignorant. Be it is it may, all views are a valued commodity.

 

[thongboy]

This girl I used to fuck was a real size queen. She made a point of going after big cocks, knew how to handle them, and she was an absolutely awesome fuck. But she recently married one of my buddies — a guy who has maybe five inches — and it's a sensational partnership, and that includes the fucking side. She's made it pretty clear that when it comes to a life-long relationship, how she feels about a guy is far more important than the size of his cock. And twins are now on the way!

 

[GorillaHorse]

To address the OP: Can't you just be happy with what you have and give less than two fucks about what other people say about it?

As for anecdotes, you will get what you look for. People will show you the side of them they think you want to see. Believing that your opinion is important is a fallacy. The blindness of the bold is humorous. Two people looking in opposite directions, screaming away from eachother is what I see.

It is hard to tell who is the fool from a distance when two people argue. It is easy to spot a gang of fools banding together to bring down an innocent bystander. Fucking dogs.

 

[Rewardheragain148]

Even though I ran into a lot of size queens in my life(one night stands) I feel that if a woman is sexually attracted to a man she’s going to fck and suck whatever he’s has.