I don’t want to start a bickering match, but there’s no way of knowing how big a guy is based on his soft size.He isn't. Let's be realistic. All of his underwear photos and videos suggest 3-4in max and for some reason, even his testicles are non-existing.
View attachment 94601001
I mean, statistically, growers have a mean increase in the length of 5.3cm (2.1 inches, n=274, 27% are growers).I don’t want to start a bickering match, but there’s no way of knowing how big a guy is based on his soft size.
I don’t see him at 1-2 inches soft. It’s impossible to know that when he’s wearing shorts. Either way, he’s gorgeous and even if he were micro sized he’s a humble studI mean, statistically, growers have a mean increase in the length of 5.3cm (2.1 inches, n=274, 27% are growers).
Grower or shower? Predictors of change in penile length from the flaccid to erect state - PubMed
I don't even expect him to be at the upper limit of the distribution. You can't anatomically expect someone to have a length increase >6in from their 1-2in flaccid state (square-cube law)... Unless you're that delusional
Well, that was not the point. You counterargued about his size despite a very prominent dick print in the leotard picture I've previously attached and I just stated the mere fact that he's probably below average.I don’t see him at 1-2 inches soft. It’s impossible to know that when he’s wearing shorts. Either way, he’s gorgeous and even if he were micro sized he’s a humble stud
Is he circumcised if he is there will be vpl dick printWell, that was not the point. You counterargued about his size despite a very prominent dick print in the leotard picture I've previously attached and I just stated the mere fact that he's probably below average.
If you can't see the dick print but sees a huge dong, IDK what to tell you... Probably ring your optometrist for optic neuropathy. I just can't stand baseless comments like "hE'S a GrOwEr, It'S BiG TrUsT" when none of his pictures suggest that he is.
Cause ya wanna feel it at least. Let alone see itWhy are there so many size queens on here? The man is hot, as long as his dick works why do we care how big it is?![]()
![]()
Cause ya wanna feel it at least. Let alone see it
Imagine him twerkingI’ll take one muscle bottom please
A whole 21 people for this study. That is NOT scientific. It also proves zero since it is only statistics, not real like biology. and with a sample of 21 people, it is complete garbage.This can even be predicted using a derived Young's modulus equation (adjusting for cavernous tissues):
Showing mean distensibility of ~3 inches (n=21, low statistical power)
View attachment 94607181
Biomechanics of male erectile function
Regardless, some of you live on Mars and would believe that he's still a 7-9 incher.
Huh? The purpose of the study is to understand the physics of erection, not compare penis sizes... Why would you need a large cohort for hemodynamic analysis? Did you even read the paper? They're not trying to establish distribution...A whole 21 people for this study. That is NOT scientific. It also proves zero since it is only statistics, not real like biology. and with a sample of 21 people, it is complete garbage.
Why are there so many size queens on here? The man is hot, as long as his dick works why do we care how big it is?![]()
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.