Sean cody

What took you so long? I was wondering when the claims of internalized homophobia would appear. : unamused:

No one is complaining about gay men having *gasps* gay sex. Fans of the old Sean Cody would just rather not see a bunch of hairless circuit queens having sex. Putting the G4P debate aside for a moment, there are tons of actual gay men who don’t fit the profile of a narcissistic muscle-gay with Peter Pan syndrome. And we’d love to see more guys like those on camera having passionate unapologetic masculine sex.

One look at this crop of guys and all I can think of is the prototypical Instagram gay who travels the world attending events, and parties while only sleeping with clones of themselves. These are NOT the types of guys that founded the SC brand. I’m sorry this observation upsets you and others so much, but it’s still the truth.

View attachment 69796641
This PERFECTLY sums it up.
 
What took you so long? I was wondering when the claims of internalized homophobia would appear. : unamused:

No one is complaining about gay men having *gasps* gay sex. Fans of the old Sean Cody would just rather not see a bunch of hairless circuit queens having sex. Putting the G4P debate aside for a moment, there are tons of actual gay men who don’t fit the profile of a narcissistic muscle-gay with Peter Pan syndrome. And we’d love to see more guys like those on camera having passionate unapologetic masculine sex.

One look at this crop of guys and all I can think of is the prototypical Instagram gay who travels the world attending events, and parties while only sleeping with clones of themselves. These are NOT the types of guys that founded the SC brand. I’m sorry this observation upsets you and others so much, but it’s still the truth.

View attachment 69796641
Very astutely put.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3403861
What took you so long? I was wondering when the claims of internalized homophobia would appear. : unamused:

No one is complaining about gay men having *gasps* gay sex. Fans of the old Sean Cody would just rather not see a bunch of hairless circuit queens having sex. Putting the G4P debate aside for a moment, there are tons of actual gay men who don’t fit the profile of a narcissistic muscle-gay with Peter Pan syndrome. And we’d love to see more guys like those on camera having passionate unapologetic masculine sex.

One look at this crop of guys and all I can think of is the prototypical Instagram gay who travels the world attending events, and parties while only sleeping with clones of themselves. These are NOT the types of guys that founded the SC brand. I’m sorry this observation upsets you and others so much, but it’s still the truth.

View attachment 69796641
co-sign
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3403861
the current models are also skewing older

i feel like the average age of current models is around 30. 10 years ago the average model was early 20s

the major appeal was the mid-west college jock experimenting

roided 30-something circuit queens are not the aesthetic
 
the current models are also skewing older

i feel like the average age of current models is around 30. 10 years ago the average model was early 20s

the major appeal was the mid-west college jock experimenting

roided 30-something circuit queens are not the aesthetic
You can just say circuit queen - the roided is already implied;)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3403861
I would just like some good camera work, direction, editing and coloring first and foremost. They can cast Tom Dick or Harry but if the formula is off it won't make a lick of difference tbh. New SC scenes are just bad, regardless of what model is there.
 
they've certainly lost the plot of this whole site. the directing and camera work is uninspired. there is clearly nobody involved that cares about the product like the original owner. creative is just punching in to get a paycheck.

doesn't help that the current models are abysmal
 
What took you so long? I was wondering when the claims of internalized homophobia would appear. : unamused:

No one is complaining about gay men having *gasps* gay sex. Fans of the old Sean Cody would just rather not see a bunch of hairless circuit queens having sex. Putting the G4P debate aside for a moment, there are tons of actual gay men who don’t fit the profile of a narcissistic muscle-gay with Peter Pan syndrome. And we’d love to see more guys like those on camera having passionate unapologetic masculine sex.

One look at this crop of guys and all I can think of is the prototypical Instagram gay who travels the world attending events, and parties while only sleeping with clones of themselves. These are NOT the types of guys that founded the SC brand. I’m sorry this observation upsets you and others so much, but it’s still the truth.
100.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 3403861
Stop trying to make some group a victim and an offender. If you paid attention, Sean Cody made its own legacy off of mostly-straight guys going gay (for at least some pay). The guys we all fell for were closeted, straight-arrowed dudes who ended up enjoying sexual interaction with other guys. This is the fetish we fell all fell for and loved, even if it is a lighter fetish. This is what we enjoyed. It's not homophobia, it's what we enjoy and what we don't enjoy. If we wanted to watch basic gay "kweens" who all look the same, then we'd go to other sites

BUT SEAN CODY WAS WHERE WE WENT FOR THE G4P FETISH
 
Stop trying to make some group a victim and an offender. If you paid attention, Sean Cody made its own legacy off of mostly-straight guys going gay (for at least some pay). The guys we all fell for were closeted, straight-arrowed dudes who ended up enjoying sexual interaction with other guys. This is the fetish we fell all fell for and loved, even if it is a lighter fetish. This is what we enjoyed. It's not homophobia, it's what we enjoy and what we don't enjoy. If we wanted to watch basic gay "kweens" who all look the same, then we'd go to other sites

BUT SEAN CODY WAS WHERE WE WENT FOR THE G4P FETISH
I will never understand this sick fetish some of you have for straight men, I can understand who has a fetish for people pissing in their face, but fetish for straight men? It's too much for me and certainly problematic
 
I'm sorry, perhaps I misunderstood. But are you guys actually complaining that the guys performing in gay porn might in fact be gay? That you would rather the men who are having sex with other men for your entertainment are doing it purely for the money and not because they actually enjoy having sex with men? That you find straight guys more intrinsically attractive than gay guys?

Because that would be a pretty fucking breathtaking display of internalised homophobia if so.

.
Thank you for that. I was speechless when I read all that bullshit that is unquestionably a spectacle of internalized homophobia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdWoody
I will never understand this sick fetish some of you have for straight men, I can understand who has a fetish for people pissing in their face, but fetish for straight men? It's too much for me and certainly problematic
At the end of the day, it might be worth remembering that pornographic/erotic appeal is very much in the eye of the beholder/consumer. In the last analysis, who knows what these men are, what their orientations are, how much they are really into it or how much is acting for the camera/paycheck or even how much they are enjoying it way more than they would like to admit? And ultimately what of it? It’s the same pure suspension of disbelief, the same openness to the liminality and concerted unreality of all fiction(s). Actors act, authors write, porn performers perform. There’s no complicated ontology, just perception, interpretation and most importantly, ejaculation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crushed Coconut