So many uncut cocks.......

[17111man]

I'm in my late 50's and since I've joined LPSG, I had no idea there were so many American men with uncut cocks out there! I am cut, and growing up I don't ever remember even seeing another guy my age in the locker room or showers that wasn't cut. Maybe a few older men at the gym or YMCA, but even those were few and far between. I am from the Northeast (PA to be exact), so I'm not sure if this was a regional trend or just a phase that was prevalent for baby boomers born in the late 40's, 50's and early 60's. I had heard that many Hispanics and African Americans were uncut, and that it was the "norm" in Europe, but I am surprised by the number of Caucasian American men my age and younger that are posting pics of their uncut cocks on the site. Is the trend to circumcise on the downturn in America? I'm not making any kind of judgement or advocacy for either.....just an observation. Your thoughts.........

 

[BillM]

That what the doctor did at the hospital!!!

 

[notN2pussy]

There have been more than I expected too, like you cut was the norm I saw growing up/ high school showers. Nice cock there!

 

[Uncutpete]

It was the norm in the 50's and 60's. It was a bad norm, to regularly cut off the foreskins of infant boys. Now, the medical societies have said that there is no medical reason to circumcise. Now, the insurance companies won't pay for it. More and more young men are intact, and that is a true advance of American civilization.

 

[BillM]

It was the norm in the 50's and 60's. It was a bad norm, to regularly cut off the foreskins of infant boys. Now, the medical societies have said that there is no medical reason to circumcise. Now, the insurance companies won't pay for it. More and more young men are intact, and that is a true advance of American civilization.

My friend on the EAST COAST you sound like a fucking Obamacare Ad!!! lol your friend Bill

 

[Uncutpete]

My friend on the EAST COAST you sound like a fucking Obamacare Ad!!! lol your friend Bill

...And how bad is that?

 

[batnballs67]

I'm from the northeast part of PA and in my late 40s. Same experience with not seeing any. Honestly, I don't know when I realized that I had something removed. ..late high school, I think. Even where I am now, there don't seem to be many intact guys. My buddy who grew up here and played every sport said all his buddies were cut...he's in his early 40s. I have to say I'm intrigued by the uncut dudes...Looks like a lot of fun to have that skin I'm missing!

 

[17111man]

I'm from the northeast part of PA and in my late 40s. Same experience with not seeing any. Honestly, I don't know when I realized that I had something removed. ..late high school, I think. Even where I am now, there don't seem to be many intact guys. My buddy who grew up here and played every sport said all his buddies were cut...he's in his early 40s. I have to say I'm intrigued by the uncut dudes...Looks like a lot of fun to have that skin I'm missing!

I have to agree with you on being intrigued with the uncut cock. There seems to be so many variations of skin length, thus the variety of "looks".......so different than my cut cock. Not gonna lie.....wish I had one!

 

[Stuckey13]

I think parents are starting to understand there is no need for circumcision and I feel lucky my parents went against the doctor who told them I needed to be circumcised when I was born

 

[art]

We were definitely the minority in the early '70s. I'd guess 5-10% intact growing up. Maybe because so many military families moving in and out, plus a lot of international kids from embassy families. At the time, it didn't seem odd to me. I was tall, early to puberty and growing a cock, so I always felt a bit of a freak. HaHaHa

 

[SirConcis]

You are seeing uncut americans here because the 7 uncut americans are all here

<ducking>

I recently stumbed on some document on circumcision rates on the candian province of Ontario in 1995 (this was to see if delisting of operation had any impact). They discovered high variations that were very regionalised. Lowest rate was in the Kingston area with 6% circ rate, but next door to the east, 20%, and near the border of Québec,
47.8% (consider that Québec is below 10%).

Similarly, even within the greater Toronto area, the eastern suburb was 47.1%, but the York region at 16.1%.

If I were to translate this to the USA, it is quite possible that most grew up in a veruy circumcised area and never saw an uncut, but there were areas where there were uncuts and those guys are visible here in a group that combines people from all regions and many countries.

Combine this with trends to leave babies iwith their long foreskins, a trend which grew more in some states and not in others, you would be seeing regional variations even today, but on a forum, you get a more even mix.


I woudl also say that because uncuts are in a minority in USA, they are more likely to seek "help" in forums to find they are not alone/different. (the word "help" isn't correct, but this only thing I can think of at this time).

 

[cityson]

I think parents are starting to understand there is no need for circumcision and I feel lucky my parents went against the doctor who told them I needed to be circumcised when I was born

If there was a need we would not have been born with a foreskin to begin with.

 

[cityson]

I have to agree with you on being intrigued with the uncut cock. There seems to be so many variations of skin length, thus the variety of "looks".......so different than my cut cock. Not gonna lie.....wish I had one!

Okay, so I am biased but fully agree. There is so much variation as to skin length, how loose or tight it is, etc. And not just between the one guy to the next, but also the one and same uncut cock has so many different looks depending on temperature, whether it's fresh out of (confining) underwear or have been hanging lose for a while and if you're flaccid, semi or erect.
Having a foreskin is like having the cake and eating it too!

 

[long_uncut]

Okay, so I am biased but fully agree. There is so much variation as to skin length, how loose or tight it is, etc. And not just between the one guy to the next, but also the one and same uncut cock has so many different looks depending on temperature, whether it's fresh out of (confining) underwear or have been hanging lose for a while and if you're flaccid, semi or erect.
Having a foreskin is like having the cake and eating it too!

And who doesn't like the guilty pleasure of cake?

 

[cityson]

And who doesn't like the guilty pleasure of cake?

Guilty as charged, long_uncut!

 

[StillSmall]

I like this new national trend, and wish it had started decades ago. These days I still get most of my u/c fix when I'm in Europe or Canada.

And speaking of European foreskin, I've got to say, @cityson, you've got a gorgeous one. I'd love to get lost in there for a few months.

 

[cityson]

I like this new national trend, and wish it had started decades ago. These days I still get most of my u/c fix when I'm in Europe or Canada.

And speaking of European foreskin, I've got to say, @cityson, you've got a gorgeous one. I'd love to get lost in there for a few months.

Thank you so much, indyraunch! Don't blame me if you never wanna come out of there again ; )

 

[Moez???]

More and more young men are intact, and that is a true advance of American civilization.

Yeah. We're still an extremely war like people, don't take care of our poor, can't stop shooting black people for no reason, arm terror groups and drug cartels, and have completely sold out our government.

But we're advancing because some people don't cut off useless, dirty skin.

 

[britishboy]

Yeah. We're still an extremely war like people, don't take care of our poor, can't stop shooting black people for no reason, arm terror groups and drug cartels, and have completely sold out our government.

But we're advancing because some people don't cut off useless, dirty skin.

Well he said "a" not "the", so it still stands, also your bias is showing when you refer to a natural body part as "useless" and "dirty", when under normal circumstances it is neither.

The unfortunate reality is that something as simple as not cutting perfectly healthy parts of baby boys off shouldn't be something to celebrate and yet it is precisely because people continue to do so despite no good reasons.

 

[Uncutpete]

Yeah. We're still an extremely war like people, don't take care of our poor, can't stop shooting black people for no reason, arm terror groups and drug cartels, and have completely sold out our government.

But we're advancing because some people don't cut off useless, dirty skin.

I agree with you in your critique of the US.
However, you are proof that someone can be informed and intelligent in one area and ignorant and foolish in another, at the same time. Foreskin is completely useful and as clean as any private part of either sex.
I would argue that a symptom of the morally weak society, of which you speak, is that we began to practice mass routine infant circumcision in the 1920's, in the first place. It was popularized as a way to stop masturbation. and continued by playing on the general germ-phobia after the First World War. Who continued it? Doctors in a medical system that found an easy fee-for-service in cutting every infant boy.
Is routine infant circumcision as bad as the number of Black people shot by police? Of course not. But then, this is LPSG, not a social justice site. (I belong to those, too).