Big_Matt_Attack
Expert Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2012
- Posts
- 35
- Media
- 24
- Likes
- 219
- Points
- 178
- Location
- Calabash, NC, USA
- Sexuality
- 90% Straight, 10% Gay
- Gender
- Male
[Statistics] Volume Chart
- Thread starter dirkjesje
- Start date
At.your.cervix
Superior Member
At just a bit better than 8X6 and rounding down, I'm just one SD beyond normal, in the 98+ percentile. I really wouldn't want to be popping up in the red end of the chart, as I'm sure those guys get an uncomfortable number of "NO!"s from their partners.
BTW, dirkjesje, get well soon and I hope you get back on two wheels again, as well. Even Rossi takes a spill and breaks something now and then.
BTW, dirkjesje, get well soon and I hope you get back on two wheels again, as well. Even Rossi takes a spill and breaks something now and then.
And why does the chart drop off at 4-1/2" length? I've been with a number of guys here in SE Asia who are shorter than that.
I know that there are smaller dicks in lenght than 4"50.
On the chart f.e. 4"50x4"00 -> 3.8639% or +/- 1 on 26 is even smaller in volume, that are a lot of men, not only from Asian origine.
Why not on the chart?
1. The lifestyle condoms survey has no normal distribution for the lower girths. As lenght correlates with girth, the volume distribution for the lower ranges are inaccurate.
2. As this is the "large" penis support group, I think that the most members are interested in the average and bigger volumes.
But if anyone is interested in the volume percentile of less than 4"50x4"00; they can just ask...
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2009
- Posts
- 888
- Media
- 96
- Likes
- 24,021
- Points
- 523
- Location
- United States
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I don't think that it's accurate because a combination of large length and girth is more rare than one or the other. And the highest value is only 1/62500 which would mean there are lots of guys with 9.25" x 7.00".
Anyways, my min is 8" NBPEL x 6.5" MEG and max is 8.25" BPEL x 7" BEG.
Anyways, my min is 8" NBPEL x 6.5" MEG and max is 8.25" BPEL x 7" BEG.
Hope the legs are OK.
Back on the bike?
A little bit embarrassed here as I would have liked to be more into the red but that is what I was born with.
Good work, Dirkjeste.
Back on the bike?
A little bit embarrassed here as I would have liked to be more into the red but that is what I was born with.
Good work, Dirkjeste.
I already mentioned in earlier posts that the chart reflects the volume.
It is just an indication, but the green zone (average >-1sd <+1sd) is pretty accurate.
( left and right from this zone reflects the volume as if the Lifestyle data was a normal distribution )
If I had the individual data (lenght x girth) of the Lifestyle Survey, I could make a very accurate volume-chart with a max error of 2%.
( and then we would also see that lenght and girth correlates strongly - what I suspect )
But you're right : volumewise a 9.25" x 7.00" is 1/62,500; this would mean that in a city of 187,500 habitants there is probably 1 with such a penis volume.
( adult males = +/- 1 on 3 // women and children = +/- 2 on 3)
That seems a bit high, but that's the data from the Lifestyle Survey.
The second chart in this thread goes to 9.50" x 7.25" : 1/500,000; just 0.25" more in lenght and girth is 8 times less.
http://www.lpsg.com/attachments/178797d1335355284-[statistics]-volume-chart-chart10725-jpg
But hey, it isn't the word of God, it's just fun to see, where you approx stands "volumewise" with your penis, without calculating yourself the volume.
Have fun.
BTW : my bike was total loss ( an oldie of the eighties: a Yamaha XV1000 )
I'm still working now on my Laverda 900, that I bought in 1983.
Never thought I would ride with that machine again.
Most of my weekends goes to searching for cheap original spare parts.
I'm to old now to buy a new bike, and honestly I'm not an admirator of those 'bling bling machines'.
And the oldies that I like - I don't have the money for it : MV Agusta, Norton...
This is an interesting chart, makes me feel pretty good about myself I must say.
7" long 6.75 around. I round down on the girth, its closer to 7, but not quite.
99.6480%
Proof is in my pics.
7" long 6.75 around. I round down on the girth, its closer to 7, but not quite.
99.6480%
Proof is in my pics.
You should interprete the chart as follows :
Bonepressed and max girth along the shaft is your maximum.
Non bone pressed and minimum girth along the shaft your minimum.
Girth measured along the shaft ( thickest point - and thinnest point).
Not glans girth! Best is to take base and midshaft girth.
For example :
Someone
6.50"x5.25" (bonepressed; max girth) : 74.2412%
6.00"x5.00" (non bone; min girth ) : 54.4311%
This means that 100%-74.2412% = 25.7588% are certainly bigger in volume ( or 1 on 4)
And that 54.4311% are smaller than that penis volume ( or a bit more than 1 on 2)
And also that 1 on 4 are approx. the same in volume.
Chart color legend :
Green -> average volume ( dark : high average - light : low average )
Yellow -> big volume ( dark +2 sd - light +1sd )
Red -> huge volume ( +3 sd )
Purple -> no comment ( +4 sd )
Remark : The Lifestyle data has a high average and median for girth.
Have fun.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Posts
- 3,112
- Media
- 21
- Likes
- 14,433
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Houston (Texas, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Posts
- 3,112
- Media
- 21
- Likes
- 14,433
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Houston (Texas, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
You will find the histogram of the Lifestyle data on this site :
Mr. Average - The true story about penis size, from a site that isn't trying to sell you anything.
Max values : Bone pressed lenght + maximum girth along the shaft (mostly base girth)
Min values : Non bone pressed lenght ( visual lenght ) + minimum girth along the shaft ( not including just below the shaft, take for this your midshaft girth )
Have fun.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Posts
- 3,112
- Media
- 21
- Likes
- 14,433
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Houston (Texas, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
OK. This should be interesting. I know the minimum girth (at mid shaft) is off the chart, literally (>7.25 inches), so the maximum girth (at the base) has got to be significantly more than that. For the chart, we use are maximum measurements, right? Wait a minute, if your min and max measurements are off the chart on the high end, it wouldn't matter which one you used because are limited to using highest value on the chart.
If your girth is more than 7.25" you take 7.25". That's far more than 3 sd, and even for a complete normal distribution very dangerous to do some probability. The surprise sits mostly in the tail. ( What's in a word )
And a correct measured girth of 7" is very very rare, so what with a +7.25"...
As I understand you're 7.25" bone pressed lenght. ( So let us presume 7" non bone )
Your max is at 7.25"x7.25" -> on the chart value below 7.25"x7.00": 99.9128%
Your min is at 7.00"x7.25" -> on the chart value below 7.00"x6.75": 99.6480%
This means that less than 1 on 1000 is bigger in volume.
Also that more than 996 on 1000 are certainly smaller in volume.
And approx 3 are likewise.
Have fun.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Posts
- 3,112
- Media
- 21
- Likes
- 14,433
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Houston (Texas, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Gay, 1% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Thanks for doing the calculations dirkjesje. That's a bit of an ego boost. As I've mentioned before, I recently lost 20 lbs, so my bone pressed length is now 7.5", 1/4 inch longer, not that it matters much. So I'm well hung and another 1/4 inch just makes me a bit more hung. I'm surprised that the maximum girth on the chart is 7 inches, because I've hooked up with a number of guys (granted, not a lot) that were as girthy as me, if not more so. It is possible though that my perspective is skewed by having had 'contact' with so many penises.
Last edited:
Me is max volume 7 BPx 5,75 MEG( midshaft erect girth) 93,40% BIG VOLUME yellow.
Min volume is 6.25 NBP x 5.50 BEG ( at the base) so 79,78% HIGH AVERAGE VOLUME dark green
Min volume is 6.25 NBP x 5.50 BEG ( at the base) so 79,78% HIGH AVERAGE VOLUME dark green
Similar threads
