too tight

They don't cut off the clitoral hood for a labia reduction, do they? Who would do that? That's unethical. And that looks a lot more than "reduced" it looks like it's totally missing.

surgeons can make a penis into a vagina.. so a smaller clit totally in the realm of chop on demand.

the clitoral hood is snipped, much like make circumcision and the glans of the clitoris are "tact" with internal sutures to hold it closer to the body... less protruding of the base/shaft of the clitoris.

the over all effect if of a less sexually mature female... newer fresher pussy with only a minimal loss of sexual feeling... only 30 easy payments of 999.99 :smile: call now, operators standing by.
 
that does NOT look like a cosmetic reduction.
not in the slightest!

i didn't say the surgeon knew what they were doing, but the scar on the labia is obvious.. but not as crude as FMG would be.

this thread is a wind-up.
 
i didn't say the surgeon knew what they were doing, but the scar on the labia is obvious.. but not as crude as FMG would be.

this thread is a wind-up.

You're right, plastic surgeons will cut it right off (Yech!!!!) I don't care if it's legal. It's unethical!

Clitoropexy / Clitoral Hood Reduction

But even these photos of successful "clitoropexies" don't look as extreme as that photo. The appearance of a "scar" could be the use of some of the tools in Photoshop, like the "blur tool" and the "clone tool" - not an actual scar.
 
Last edited:
i didn't say the surgeon knew what they were doing, but the scar on the labia is obvious.. but not as crude as FMG would be.

this thread is a wind-up.
oh, i've considered it could be bogus.
but usually in these threads, on the off chance it's a real person in distress, i give my opinion as though it were.
i would hate to go for the smug, ''ha! i spotted the faker!'' stance on a genuine person.
...not unless i was damn sure anyway.
 
oh, i've considered it could be bogus.
but usually in these threads, on the off chance it's a real person in distress, i give my opinion as though it were.
i would hate to go for the smug, ''ha! i spotted the faker!'' stance on a genuine person.
...not unless i was damn sure anyway.

You're right, and I'd also rather err on the side of "helpful" than not and not everyone looks the same.

If she has had a female circumcision, then the scar tissue could explain why she's so tight, but surely she would know it, wouldn't she?
 
You're right, and I'd also rather err on the side of "helpful" than not and not everyone looks the same.

If she has had a female circumcision, then the scar tissue could explain why she's so tight, but surely she would know it, wouldn't she?

oh, i've considered it could be bogus.
but usually in these threads, on the off chance it's a real person in distress, i give my opinion as though it were.
i would hate to go for the smug, ''ha! i spotted the faker!'' stance on a genuine person.
...not unless i was damn sure anyway.

:redface: okay, i'm an ass.

and yesh.. the OP might be legit.. so to OP.

the picture you used is of a woman who for whatever reason has had some type of genital alteration preformed. and maybe some heavy photoshop'ing done after the fact. eta: there are women with very small clitoris *clitori?clitoreses?* my ex-girlfriend was a mini-clit gal until she hit the level of extremely aroused.. so if you have a naturally occurring small clit, no worries.. it normal as can be. same with smaller labia, minor and majora.. snowflakes = pussy :biggrin:

your best bet is taking Ms. Dolfette's advice to see a doctor. you might have issues with your hymen, you could have some type of scarring or contracture... but we can't tell you from a photograph or even a detailed description. :smile: eta: the out appearance of female genitalia doesn't really have much to do with inner structures anyway.

if you google search your local city and free health clinic you can find walk and slide fee clinics in your area.. just in case insurance/getting insurance information form the family is an issue.

you might be embarrassed but doctors have seen everything and they will be able to help you.
 
Last edited:
This image has been altered in Photoshop. I am 100 percent sure. I examined the metadata and the compression signature. JPG Snoop rocks!

NOTE: JFIF COMMENT field is known software
Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata:

ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited


So the question to the OP is, if you are who you say you are why did you alter your image?
 
Last edited:
Ditto. I wish some of the stories people tell on here were as easily checked as photo manipulation.
 
This image has been altered in Photoshop. I am 100 percent sure. I examined the metadata and the compression signature. JPG Snoop rocks!

NOTE: JFIF COMMENT field is known software
Based on the analysis of compression characteristics and EXIF metadata:

ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited

Oh my god, smart women make me so frigging hard.

I may actually have to upload a verification pic of my own just so I can see what you people are talking about. Grr.