Un-hung Celebs

1

13788

Guest
BigStroker: Having given this subject some thought, I ransacked my memory and realized that most of the Hollywood set of whom we have actual film of their genitals, most are not huge, or gifted. In fact, many are below average. Maybe that's why they went into acting: to make up for deficiencies down there. Look:
In a 1970's movie (Buster & Billie?), Jan Michael Vincent gives a full frontal. Small.
In the same era, buffed up Johnny Crawford (The Rifleman's son, Mark) appeard nude in a movie, not sure of the name. Small.
Burt Reynolds...average, sort of. There were other pictures taken than the famous one that showed up in Cosmo, and 30 years ago they were quite popular in the gay underground in the biz.
Tom Cruise in All the Right Moves...small.
Arnold Schwarzenegger. He didn't show dick in a movie, but there are plenty of pictures of him available...not hung.
Handsome Josh Duhamel (Las Vegas)...average, if he's lucky.
Brad Pitt...average.
Malcolm MacDowell shows it in Caligula...average, although some of the characters in the background are HUGE.
In fact, there's only one Hollywood dick I've seen that's really decent: Kyle MacLachlin in Blue Velvet. His flaccid member is quite long. Too bad we never got to see it in Sex and the City.
So where are these well-hung stars?
 

txquis

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Posts
1,682
Media
0
Likes
71
Points
368
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
You can't go by the size that they are when flaccid,
which is all we ever see

I can name you five of my own partners
who were TINY when flaccid,
and grew to enormous (and I mean enormous)
length.

It's too bad we can't judge by
the non-erect state.
 

benderten2001

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Posts
933
Media
0
Likes
16
Points
258
Originally posted by txquis@Jul 18 2004, 03:29 PM
"...It's too bad we can't judge by
the non-erect state."
We have to consider too, that many of the bigger flaccid sizes....
are just not (reliably) all that much bigger when erect!

But since most guys see one another when flaccid and not erect,
it IS the flaccid size that we remember the most and quite often seems to impress us men-- first and foremost.

Women might be impressed too, (with flaccid) but it's gonna be the erect sizes which seemingly "wows" and impacts them.

I geneuinely believe the subject of "celebrity endowments" is merely yet another extension of enjoying yet another type of fantasy..."supposing and what if".

'Tends to makes a pleasant past time activity for many.

Interestingly, bucks can be made from the rumors sometimes--even though just the opposite is often true...(the hung really aren't when the small perhaps... really ARE!)

And, so on and so on and so on-----
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
258
Age
40
Well, I know Arnold's average. And Tom Cruise is below average, judging by All the Right Moves.
 
1

13788

Guest
AimoWänkä: You can't really say actors size by how they seem on a film. Quite a few of them use stuntman when filming bodyparts. Wasn't there some actor who didn't get a role in a moviw with a nude scene because he did not want to use stuntman and the producers said he is too small...?!
 

Pecker

Retired Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Posts
54,502
Media
0
Likes
323
Points
283
Originally posted by AimoWänkä@Aug 11 2004, 12:15 PM
Wasn't there some actor who didn't get a role in a moviw with a nude scene because he did not want to use stuntman and the producers said he is too small...?!
Herve Villechaize?
 
1

13788

Guest
AimoWänkä: It was one of the younger big star's but I just can't remember who. Anyways...
 

Duo187

Sexy Member
Joined
May 15, 2004
Posts
102
Media
9
Likes
43
Points
248
Age
38
Location
North Carolina
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I remember seeing a "how it was made" about MIB 2. They were frequently making jokes about the guy offa Jackass who was on there. forgot his name... lol. Apparently he was sitting down with it showing and it was tiny.. according to the cast memebers of course.
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
258
Age
40
Yeah, well, with Arnold, it's from his gay porn career which happened to be shown all over California inboxes with the line "our next governor" during the circus -- I mean election. Surprised that he was circumcised though; you'd think the son of a Nazi wouldn't be, I mean, what with the whole thing about hating Jews.
 
1

13788

Guest
lighthouse: I think that was a body-double in "all the right moves." There is no shot with both Cruise's face and the dick in the same frame.
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
258
Age
40
Here's an image with better lighting:

http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/entertai...r/asnaked02.jpg

If I assume his dick starts where everyone else's does and remember his clothed shots from that era, he's average. It also looks cut to me; it could just be retracted though.

As I understand it, during this time, he did some gay porn and some straight. (There's a picture of him with a woman behind him, her breasts just over his head, floating out on the net.) He looks more like the type in gay porn simply because he's actually attractive.
 

KinkGuy

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Posts
2,794
Media
0
Likes
157
Points
268
Age
70
Location
southwest US
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Remember Stalone's "Italian Stallion" (bad, really bad, even for low budget soft porn) porn movie? He certainly wern't nuthin' to get worked up over in the endowment department. Am I remembering this right….or having a nightmare? :wacko:
 

B_RoysToy

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Posts
7,115
Media
0
Likes
292
Points
283
Age
34
Location
memphis, tennessee
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
You're right, kinkguy. I've seen a picture of his cock and it's just a water spout --quite small for such a muscular torso, arms and legs!
 

george

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Posts
305
Media
0
Likes
99
Points
248
Age
34
I remember Arnold's full frontal nude shot that was published in some major magazine about 6-7 yrs. ago?
Anyone have a link to that pic?
He looked really impressive in that photo, and he was cut, if I remember correctly, or perhaps he had the skin pulled back.

I do recall he was quite large, which I was suprised to see in someone of his size and build.
 
1

13788

Guest
BigStroker: NO, Arnold's limp dick is very, very average. Balls probably smaller than. You can also add Peter Lupus (1960's Mission Impossible) to the HUGE list. There was a smashing Playgirl spread of him many years ago. His erection was extremely large - long AND thick.

David Cassidy was nicknamed DONK. I know people who have seen him in all manner of excitement. Average length, thicker than.

I was in Aspen, Co, the week that the Kobe story broke. One of the bitches friends said on TV that she was going around telling people he was huge, and holding her hands apart to indicate the size. I knew from the beginning she was out for money.
 

D_Iskepee_Longwoodee

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Posts
782
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
163
You can't go by the size that they are when flaccid,
which is all we ever see

I can name you five of my own partners
who were TINY when flaccid,
and grew to enormous (and I mean enormous)
length.

It's too bad we can't judge by
the non-erect state.

A penis will not grow from a 2" state to a 8 inch state....it is not scientifically possible. However, if you are referring to a penis that goes from 3 or 4 flaccid to 7" or 7.5...that is more possible...However, a 3 or 4 inch penis is not able to expand to 8.5, 9, or 10" or more. There has been plenty of research done on this exact issue.

Please clarify what you mean by tiny and enormous!