Absolutely. You've found the missing piece of the puzzle that John Locke overlooked. Write up an amendment and we'll call a constitutional convention and get that shit ratified!
Do you agree that big dicks should be a basic human right similar to free speech or equality under the law?
Sounds like the fallacy of the middle class
"Everyone will have it all"
Inherently flawed in that no one is happy unless they have more
Never mind Dick size @wallyj84 . Let's talk about your small Brain...Do you agree that big dicks should be a basic human right similar to free speech or equality under the law?
I believe big dicks are fundamental to human happiness and recognition of this fact is a requirement for any nation to be considered civilized, IMO.
Here is how I think big dicks as a human right should work. First of all big dicks are both a positive and negative right. The government must never do anything to limit our access to precious big dicks and should promote policies that increase the number of big dicks and our access to them. A modern, civilized nation should promote the immigration of hung studs into the nation. They should also dedicate at least 2% of GDP PE research and create programs to allow the general populace to have access to hung studs when needed.
What do you guys think? How should the government's of the world handle the right to big dicks?
Tough to say, since I don't know what you mean by "basic human right". Could you provide a definition for that?
What about the rights of the person who has the big dick to not have to be forced to allow others to be near it? It sounds like you are advocating for the government to decide who has sex with who, and forcing people to have sex with people they might not want to have sex with. You don't have any rights in regards to a relationship with my penis or anyones penis other than your own.
No right is natural. It's given by society, ideology and law (in general other people or authorities). That's why parties argue what's a human right and what isn't (migration for example). And that's why you even can ask such questions.Human rights are the natural and legal rights that belong to every person on Earth.
Human rights are the natural and legal rights that belong to every person on Earth.
When I say that big dicks are a basic human right, I mean that everyone has a right to pursue big dicks for sexual pleasure or some other use. People also have the right to pursue activities that will give them a big dick through surgical or chemical means. The government also has a responsibility to ensure that all citizens have access to big dicks and the ability to make their cocks big.
Does that explain my viewpoint?
Big dicks are essential for Human happiness. There is a greater need for them than something like education or marriage. Two things that the UN considers basic human rights.
Not at all. I think you can have sex with whoever you want. I do think the government should hire sex workers with large cocks to provide penis related services to people who can't get big dicks on their own.
Sex workers are usually able to be picky about their clientele. Having the government force them to provide "penis related services" violates their right to not provide those services to someone who they don't want to provide those services to.
You are saying that your want/right to get a service from a big dick is more important than the wants or rights of the person who owns that big dick.
None of that is currently limited by any legal statute.
But you can claim anything is a "basic human right". That doesn't make it so.
Not at all. I think you can have sex with whoever you want. I do think the government should hire sex workers with large cocks to provide penis related services to people who can't get big dicks on their own.
Nope. Not at all. I never said that hung studs would be forced to service anyone. I said the government would hire sex workers, not force anyone into conscription.
You're arguing against something I never said.
The only way this works is if you allow those sex workers the right to deny their "big penis services" to anyone. If they can do that then there is no guarantee that everyone who wants those services receives those services. What if this were implemented and all of the sex workers decided that they didn't want to provide you with their services? By your logic they are refusing you a basic human right. The only way you can fulfill your "basic human right" in that scenario is to violate one of the sex workers rights in favor of your own.
If you don't see that as a problem then just keep the government out of it and go pay for a prostitute yourself. I'm with you if you are arguing to decriminalize prostitution, but by having the government hire them to service people at the governments will is ignoring the rights of the person providing the service to not have sex with someone they don't want to have sex with.
Education isn't illegal either, but we still expect for the government to help people obtain it and it is considered a human right.