Chase Arcangel Hotguysfuck/onlyfans

[RGHRGH]

dex offender

sex**** offender

 

[mmpf16]

all because @capy stated facts?



Oh, boy.


Sure they can.

On a legal level, "minor" is defined diffferently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; country to country.
And then, biologically speaking, a hormonal teenager isn't going to stop being a hormonal teenager just because the law says so; and fearmongering people want to socially make it so.
(I was a gay 14yo boy, once upon a fairytale time; pursuing my mother's gay 29yo employee, James. I wanted him, I was "going to get him no matter what", I said to myself. H-yeah... I was "pure and innocent" alright for thinking this.... except I wasn't.)

Make no mistake. I'm handing no white card for sick sexual predators to rape the innocent; underage, elderly or otherwise. I'm merely stating a rational-minded argument. (And, no, brats. That isn't what "they" "taught [me] to say in pedo camp." You see how easily predictable some of these counter-responses become?)


Well, yeah. @capy and everyone knows that, already.


Heh...As if your saying so is going to stop the likes of Chases's underage girlfriend from manipulating innocent adult men as Chase (as if he's the only guy who fell prey to a lying not-of-age individual); and stop gay Grindr underage teenagers from preyfully seeking out law-abiding gay men....

Are you and Nicki Minaj taking the same c*ke or something.

 

[capy]

Actually, statistics, much of which has been governmental findings itself, is what has said this: that convicted sex offenders are sone of the lowest recividists of all ex-convicts, only second to murderers (who virtually never do it sgain after their first murder); the same findings uncovered thst more than 90% of new sex offenses are committed by people who are not on the registry.

Was going to say likewise.


Oh, au contraire! There's quite a difference.

Do you know what Justin Heath (a.k.a. Austin Wolf) has done? He has paid off the parents to keep silent about his raping their very underage sons (10 and under, was it? Or, no?); having forcefully performed sadomasochistic acts on them, even. I think that's only some of it.

What has Chase Archangel done? He had consensual sex with a willing and nearly legal teen; all the while his jurisdiction doesn’t legally recognize it as consensual.

Obvious difference!!




Their consenting sexuality is apparently what in this case.

That's all I can say here.


I'm sorry, are we approaching defamation territory, now?

Do you have any concrete proof he was doing this?


BigBoaster, you and I get along quite a bit, especially in those 'gays fuck women and/or pussy' threads. I'm not going to change that one bit.

Respectfully, I'm going to disagree here. I'm 'defending' people in Chase's situation, because I have a vested interest in the topic. When I was 14 and gay, I had many men of whom I desired; most including my mother's gay 29-year-old then-employee, James. (I knew James well enough to know he couldn't harm a fly, let alone anyone under age.) It was this that had led to my academic interest in the legal topic, especially during my university undergrad years. I won't get too deeply into it. I've long studied that no jurisdiction seems to fully agree as to what is the legal age of capable consent. Some place it as high as 21, others have it as low as 14. (Many developed modern European and Latin-American countries set their Minimum Age of consent at 14; aith regulatory companion laws as to what an adult can and can't do with said 25-individual.)

Nations are already recognizing the need to protect minors from predation; and, at the same time, acknowledging and respecting their sexual freedom, which may include their desire to have some level of consensual sex with whom they want.

Sadly, no matter how ugly one is, I'd credit some global laws to allow him to have sex with her.

Again, please make no mistake. I'm not dismissing Chase for having broken a law. One should always abide by the legal standards set in his/her jurisdiction(!!). And, certsinly, I dont condone sick scumbag offenders sexually hurting children anymore than the next concerned individual. I'm simply saying that, having studied this topic on a global scale (at least casually), he (Chase) and others with an unforced, willing girlfriend who lied about her age may not truly be the "perverts" and "predators" we'd like to say they are.

Your post is pure gold

 

[RGHRGH]

Are you and Nicki Minaj taking the same c*ke or something.

Nah, simply a curious and forward thinker is what I am.

 

[RGHRGH]

...

I'm also assuming that you didn't actually read my post; probably read a few words, before being provoked to go to some very dark place (where none actually exists).

 

[mmpf16]

I'm also assuming that you didn't actually read my post; probably read a few words, before being provoked to go to some very dark place (where none actually exists).

A dark place for saying you’re on a coke rant ? And replying me to from Last December. You’re the weirdo who’s defending Chase when the state he was caught in for having a picture of a minor under 16 when that’s their LAW and weird Grindr conversation that doesn’t correlate with this situation cause she was a minor and a GIRL lol and saying this girl was manipulating older “innocent” men. Whatever helps you sleep at night weirdo.

 

[Mewmew37]

Are you and Nicki Minaj taking the same c*ke or something.

Best comeback ever.

 

[RGHRGH]

....And replying me to from Last December.

And, unfortunately for you, Bub', I couldn't give a cum-glazed shit if your post dates back to December (7 months ago) or back to the last living Bracchiosaurus. The things you say back then are every bit as valid and representative of a real occuring thought and idea as having been expressed now. The problem with this quite typical) hackneyed resortment to age of post being replied to is that it's old age doesn't make you any less 'wrong'.

You’re the weirdo who’s defending Chase ... lol and saying this girl was manipulating older “innocent” men. Whatever helps you sleep at night weirdo.

Are you proud of your dishonest, brain-dead assessment of my post?

 

[RGHRGH]

Best comeback ever.

Not the best behavior^^: trying to provoke a response by complimenting an insult; however pathetic.
As I've said before, you have to be 18 and older to be on this site. Please start acting like it.

 

[mmpf16]

And, unfortunately for you, Bub', I don't give a cum-glazed shit if your post dates back to December 7 months ago or back to the last living Bracchiosaurus. The things you say back then are every bit as valid and representative as now of a real thought and idea that had occurred. The problem with this quite typical) hackneyed resortment to age of post being replied to is that it's old age doesn't make you any less 'wrong'.



Are you proud of your dishonest, brain-dead assessment of my post?

 

[RGHRGH]

Is that supposed to be some sort of admittance of your honesty and maturity?

 

[whoweat]

(I was a gay 14yo boy, once upon a fairytale time; pursuing my mother's gay 29yo employee, James. I wanted him, I was "going to get him no matter what", I said to myself. H-yeah... I was "pure and innocent" alright for thinking this.... except I wasn't.)

all this talk because you couldn't suck off your mom's employee lmfaoooo please be fucking serious

the whole teenager-manipulating-a-27-year-old argument is cute. is that because you couldn't manipulate someone older to have sex with you when you were a teenager? and by believing the 15-year old manipulated chase, you get to have that fantasy?

this is just a wild guess but maybe we're projecting a little bit here.

but then again, you do believe the 27-year old was somehow the victim in this whole mess so the idea isn't that wild

 

[RGHRGH]

all this talk because you couldn't suck off your mom's employee lmfaoooo please be fucking serious

Okay, I'll be serious.
**Being serious***

the whole teenager-manipulating-a-27-year-old argument is cute.

I'll tell you what's cute: your Ad Hominem Red Herring; and, I'd have to imagine that this is borderline Strawman.

is that because you couldn't manipulate someone older to have sex with you when you were a teenager?

Well, look at you, babe: making all these assumptions about my situation, which parts I haven't even established so far.

and by believing the 15-year old manipulated chase, you get to have that fantasy?

I don't think I was the one who made up that his girlfriend lied about her age to Chase.

Or, did I misunderstand that from a few previous posts thst mentioned this?

(I was only going off what people told me in this thread, see?)

this is just a wild guess but maybe we're projecting a little bit here.

You're allowed to guess.

And, if by self-projection, you mean expressing a logical thought based on my own historic feelings on the matter, then, yeah. I'm "projecting" alright.

I wasnt exactly hiding it.

but then again, you do believe the 27-year old was somehow the victim in this whole mess so the idea isn't that wild

Do you or do you not understand why? The girlfriend made up her age. He thought it was legal. That is my understanding of this case.

Again, unless I misunderstood, I shouldn't need reiterate my obvious position on the matter.

 

[RGHRGH]

...

Also, I like how you completely ignored my points regarding international age of consent. Are you not able to counter-reply to it? Does it cause you to question your world-view on sexual morality, and it makes you uncomfortable? (Wouldn't be the first time)

 

[Trybogus01]

That's easy; I can swiftly answer that question with my hands tied behind my back, stripped naked with a Dildonic shoved far up my ass by some aggressively aroused heterosexual woman, ready to sexually take advantage of a willing hairy, semi-muscular, submissive Chinese gay guy as myself.

If you're as old as in your 30's, typically a 15-year-old (sometimes even a 14-year-old) cannot always be easily distinguishable from the appearance of a 21-year-old; as you've long moved passed that age bracket to be able to always make that fine distinction.

Done.



Then, you can either
1 - protest until the age of consent is legally raised to 25 (close to the 27yo's own age),
2 - demand that at least a-third of all porn sites, which features "daddies" and some "young college" bratz, be shut down,
3 - seek out the scientific method to alter human sexual nature to biologically befit your ideal age gap limit, (since obviously Romeo-Juliet exemption clauses in local sex offense laws do not do that enough for you), or
4 - simply shut the mother-jizzblast up; and stop complaining, unless you have a (better) solution to actually cease the very issue which you're whining about.



...
Or, maybe the 'truth' of it is: he didn't stay imprisoned that long because that was the right and just sentence handed him; seeing that the judge rationally saw mitigation in the fact that the "predator" wasnt actively trying to rape an underage girl.

Thank you! This is the most reasonable response here compared to the immature haters in this thread.

I don't think you'd be chuckling your good heart out, if you were jailed for unintentionally having unlawful sex because your "victim" manipulated you.

Jailed and freed, right. Because there's no merit to the case.

Ah, my mistake. I should have looked up what he was actually convicted of. I assumed it was statutory rape of a minor; where the girl lied directly to him about being legal-of-age. It was actually for unlawful underage images/videos.

That doesn't change my opinion on the matter. Just thought I'd acknowledge that silly little error of mine.

Like these youngins are innocent at all.

all because @capy stated facts?



Oh, boy.


Sure they can.

On a legal level, "minor" is defined diffferently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; country to country.
And then, biologically speaking, a hormonal teenager isn't going to stop being a hormonal teenager just because the law says so; and fearmongering people want to socially make it so.
(I was a gay 14yo boy, once upon a fairytale time; pursuing my mother's gay 29yo employee, James. I wanted him, I was "going to get him no matter what", I said to myself. H-yeah... I was "pure and innocent" alright for thinking this.... except I wasn't.)

Make no mistake. I'm handing no white card for sick sexual predators to rape the innocent; underage, elderly or otherwise. I'm merely stating a rational-minded argument. (And, no, brats. That isn't what "they" "taught [me] to say in pedo camp." You see how easily predictable some of these counter-responses become?)


Well, yeah. @capy and everyone knows that, already.


Heh...As if your saying so is going to stop the likes of Chases's underage girlfriend from manipulating innocent adult men as Chase (as if he's the only guy who fell prey to a lying not-of-age individual); and stop gay Grindr underage teenagers from preyfully seeking out law-abiding gay men....

The things we did at a very young age

 

[capy]

I am waiting for both of them to come back together


https://thegay.com/videos/946393/chase-arcangel-jeremy-barker/

 

[RGHRGH]

Thank you! This is the most reasonable response here compared to the immature haters in this thread.


Jailed and freed, right. Because there's no merit to the case.


Like these youngins are innocent at all.


The things we did at a very young age

Lol I appreciate the acknowledgement, hon'.

And, you know what's sad regarding all this? Members as @whoweat (alias @mmpf16?) evidently know they're dishonest.

Take a look at his responses from pg. 79. (Not sure why I skipped over the first of these the first time)

... he's still a sex offender. It doesn't really matter if the girl "consented" to them being filmed. the fact that she was under 16 is enough reason. He is 27. Even if he didn't know she was 16, (In other words, you knew he didn’t all along...) she would have looked WAY too young for him not to question it. (You don't know that he didn't; and that, in the end, green lights weren't still falsely given to him.)

he got caught this one time—who's to say he hasn't done it before or won't do it again?

@whoweat utterly answered his own question here: by his logicality, if Chase didn't know the consenting girl was underage to begin with, wouldn't that alone nullify the very suspicion of his conscious predation that would have been born out of knowing the girl was underage?

 

[RGHRGH]

He (@whoweat) brings up "self projection", when the establishment of that point wasn't even begged for:

...the whole teenager-manipulating-a-27-year-old argument is cute. is that because you couldn't manipulate someone older to have sex with you when you were a teenager? and by believing the 15-year old manipulated chase, you get to have that fantasy?

this is just a wild guess but maybe we're projecting a little bit here. ....

I'm going to, as of this point, predict that he himself has certain inner demons which he's trying to battle and cope with; seeing that he knows all about "projection". (All along, his anti-"sex-offender" expressions were designed to irritably provoke me into forking over a response that would comfort him: my re-assurance that a "pedo" like Chase is humanly "innocent"; which word I used he was completely infatuated with. I know this psychological mind game anywhere.)

In conclusion, I hope @whoweat "finds the help he needs"; whatever that may specifically mean to him.

**kiss on the cheeks for being an adorable cute little baby**
That^^^ is my "pedo" love to him.

 

[RGHRGH]

**kiss on the cheeks for being an adorable cute little baby**
That^^^ is my "pedo" love to him.

(Because I have to spell it out for some)
For the record, brats, no, I wasn't being serious. That was my vomitrociously humorous attempt being a silly-hearted troll; for the levity of the moment.

 

[Ajedrez]

View attachment 162362141View attachment 162362131View attachment 162362121View attachment 162362111View attachment 162362101View attachment 162362091

Hot ass