Shes with circ list. www.circlist.com they are obsessed with circumcision and get off on watching little baby boys get strapped down and cut. Doesnt get any sicker than that.... You do however have the right to be a fuc#$ed up freak in the usa!
Circumcision?
- Thread starter chuckiejock
- Start date
MG, you may change your name, but you are still the totally clueless, pointless, babbler that you've always been. My daughter, having just given birth to a baby boy, had to fight off her mother-in-law, sister-in-law, and grandmother-in-law to keep her baby's foreskin.
well what ever in the world does [ she ] wish to do with it now that she has his foreskinyou sound like something referred to as incest with that statement. lets hope not. other than your anti-circ. BS. you mite be an OK person but leaving a gap such as that in your post??? one has to wonder about you now.
Most women are as clueless as you are when it comes to RIC and men's sexual apparatus. But you're always good for a laugh.
I'm not clueless at all herk. Ive experienced many on both sides [ cut uncut ] and I'm well aware of mens apparatus as you refer to your cock LOL. and yes you sure are good for a good laugh when it comes to thinking you know it all about the guys who are CIRCUMCISED.. as unlike what you feel about them. cut guys are the best hands down. you like what ever and i will do the same. but you need to find out what that daughter of yours is going to do with that foreskin its your duty.
[anti-circs. ha ]
god help you Herkimer you need it it seems.
I'm not clueless at all herk. Ive experienced many on both sides [ cut uncut ] and I'm well aware of mens apparatus as you refer to your cock LOL. and yes you sure are good for a good laugh when it comes to thinking you know it all about the guys who are CIRCUMCISED.. as unlike what you feel about them. cut guys are the best hands down. you like what ever and i will do the same. but you need to find out what that daughter of yours is going to do with that foreskin its your duty.
[anti-circs. ha ]
When all you can appreciate is a guy with a scar, cut guys are the best, hands down. Some of us are not that narrow. Everyone has some attractive features. No one is perfect. Fine looking cocks come in both circumcised and uncircumcised varieties. But, if all you can appreciate is one model, "cut guys are the best hands down". You keep repeating it so often, it is like you are trying to hypnotize yourself.
What a sad and sorry person...if I can presume that you are a person, and not simply a program which responds to every post with "cut guys are the best hands down". Kind of makes a person wonder why God even bothered to create males with foreskins. Was it a mistake?
Always think it is weird to prefer that scarring. Even when the scar is not real obvious, over a nice warm mobile skin cocoon.
WELL he must have made lots of mistakes with some uncut guys Ive seen and know. as CUT GUYS ARE THE BEST HANDS DOWN . LOL. you sure are in fantasy land with your foreskin BS. and at least i don't have to post twice in a row to the same person like you do quite often here any more. could it be your to stupid to remember more than one or two paragraphs at a time. or is it because your jerking off to your foreskin fetish and you keep forgetting what it was you wanted to post and who to and/or what for. sorry piece a work mandoman. OH did i tell you that CUT GUYS ARE THE BEST HANDS DOWN.:arms:
Last edited:
Circumcision: Change in medical opinion possible -- chicagotribune.com
Texas businessman Dean Pisani recently pledged $1 million to Intact America because, he said, he and his wife were pressured in 1999 by a physician at Northwestern Memorial Hospital to circumcise their first child, a boy. They refused.
"She made us feel very guilty about our decision," said Pisani, who at the time was living in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood. "She said some things that were inappropriate at the time, really putting on pressure."
During his wife's 48-hour hospital stay, three other doctors asked why the baby was still intact, he said.
_______________________
Circumciser Schoen they refer to later in the article was born in 1925 and helped establish circumcision policy in the U.S. Extremely influential. Extremely old school.
Texas businessman Dean Pisani recently pledged $1 million to Intact America because, he said, he and his wife were pressured in 1999 by a physician at Northwestern Memorial Hospital to circumcise their first child, a boy. They refused.
"She made us feel very guilty about our decision," said Pisani, who at the time was living in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood. "She said some things that were inappropriate at the time, really putting on pressure."
During his wife's 48-hour hospital stay, three other doctors asked why the baby was still intact, he said.
_______________________
Circumciser Schoen they refer to later in the article was born in 1925 and helped establish circumcision policy in the U.S. Extremely influential. Extremely old school.
I was cut at 58 - best thing I ever did. Uncomfortable for a few day but I also had a hernia operation at the same time. No more discomfort and looks better.
Kill two birds with one stone, eh? We're talking about routine infant circumcision (RIC) anyway.
Well this isnt about RIC. Here is what the OP said.
Let's get back on track here.
Hey! What's wrong with being uncircumcised?
In fact, why the hell are people even argueing about this?
I'm perfectly happy the way I am. If you have a problem with it yourself, aethetically or physically, then get it checked. If not, then no problem.
I don't see why this thread has turned into a flame war....
Circumcision: Change in medical opinion possible -- chicagotribune.com
Texas businessman Dean Pisani recently pledged $1 million to Intact America
yes DXJ. we know all about it. its some more BS. from the anti-circs, poor fellow he got his feelings hurt, and he had to spend a million bucks so every one would know it. RIGHT D.
SSSSHHHHH the anti-circs will hear you and they will come get you and carry you away to their land of the lost foreskins. and we will never get to see you any more.:biggrin1:
Because some of us are trying to change U.S. RIC culture, and social change is very slow. You basically wait on people with the old views to die off. :sad:I don't see why this thread has turned into a flame war....
LOL. then what your saying is when your gone circumcision will NO longer be looked at the way you look at it now ?
so D. how long do you have :biggrin1::biggrin1:
Last edited:
Back in the 40s 50s and 60s, the pro-circ folks used many exagerations to promote circumcision. "if you don't get cut, you'll get cancer, or give your wife cancer" or "you'll have diseases, infections all your life" etc etc etc.
It is ironic that in trying to fight those original pro-circ exagerations, the anti-circ crowd has become guilty of making similar exagerations at the other end of spectrum (mutilation, they cut off all your nerves, the baby will be in pain and won't be able to walk for a few years etc etc etc)
If the anti-circ folks had kept it to "it isn't necessary", "give your son the right to choose", "you don't need to be cut to get into the army", "there are now plenty of uncut males so you son won't feel different at school" etc etc. So, if they kept it to those reasonable arguments, the debate would be far better.
It is ironic that in trying to fight those original pro-circ exagerations, the anti-circ crowd has become guilty of making similar exagerations at the other end of spectrum (mutilation, they cut off all your nerves, the baby will be in pain and won't be able to walk for a few years etc etc etc)
If the anti-circ folks had kept it to "it isn't necessary", "give your son the right to choose", "you don't need to be cut to get into the army", "there are now plenty of uncut males so you son won't feel different at school" etc etc. So, if they kept it to those reasonable arguments, the debate would be far better.
yes indeed it would of been. on both side really how ever some of what the pro circs have said and used in the past for their cause is true in many ways, not all but a lot of it, that being said their isn't a whole lot of what the anti-circs,said or still trying to use about circumcision in the past or today for that matter really true in the since of actual proving and showing facts about their cause as to being cut or not. how ever some people on both sides stretch the truth a bit. I'm not one of them but i do prefer cut for many reasons and some of them have been proven true as to the healthy benefits of a guy being circumcised in comparison to a guy who is uncut as to him self and his sexual partner and good benefits to sex along with when he is cut. but as said many times it should be the guy not just his cock status.:wink:
Last edited:
I don't know if this has been mentioned but if it has you can ignore this. I have done research into alternatives to circumcision because I have a condition called phimosis that means my foreskin will not retract. I have read that there are at least a couple of alternatives to circumcision such as herbal supplements and stretching techniques or a medical procedure where the foreskin is actually stretched over a period of time so that it will retract. You'll have to do your own research and talk to doctors for anything in depth. I hope that helps a little.
yes their are other things but they take a long time to work if they work at all. and depending on how bad it is they most never will work and circumcision still needs to be done. so its best to see an MD. that knows his stuff and get it done right the way you wont it to look etc. etc. and be on to enjoying your sexual life more pleasantly with out all the hassle or fuss of a sore useless foreskin and cock as well due to what you say you have.. but it really is up to you what you do here you can put up with it as some do, or get circumcised and the problem is over with and you can enjoy more fulfilling sex with a cut cock.:wink:
OK. You explain to me how a man retains all the sensation, when the most sensitive parts, the inner foreskin and frenulum, are damaged, or totally removed.
Giving your son the right to choose is not an exaggeration, or a misstatement.
Its simple ethics. You don't typically remove healthy body parts from a non-consenting person. Adding insult to literal injury, is the doctor who sells the foreskin to a biogen company to grow skin, and makes most of the profit there, not from the circumcision. You may think this is absurd, but it is happening down the street from me. They put the foreskin in bovine collagen, and grow enough skin to cover a football field.
Your hyperbole is a joke. Show me one place where someone against RIC said "they cut off all your nerves, the baby will be in pain and won't be able to walk for a few years".
All this said, I personally like you. You have a balance lacking in some of the other pro-circumcision people, like MorningGlory, Sargon20, and VinylBoy, to name a few.
Similar threads
